Deadbeat dad, singer & Ruben Studdard look-alike Sean Levert died of natural causes; prob. faked his death to avoid paying all that C.S.

"DVD" wrote in message
...
Phil wrote:

"DVD" wrote in message
...

Phil wrote:

I don't see an answer to my hypothetical situation yet, afraid to be
honest?


Which is what, exactly?


Based on the tag line, should a wealthy child molester (or the meth
dealer) get custody just because he pays child support? Yes or no is
fine.


You mean like a "yes" or "no" to the question "Do you still beat your
wife"?

No, a yes no question like the one above. Try to be honest once and tell
me what you think.

I think that without a valid and proven charge, men should be just as
qualified as women to have custody.

In this case the guy molests children, tell the truth, should he have
custody?

I think I answered this already.
The truth is, this is one of the little falsehoods divorce attorneys
encourage women to use in divorce and custody cases, accusing the father
of being a molester, even of his own children, or a drunk or womanizer or
many other things when the fact is, he is not. The favorite is accusing
him of abuse (or fear of abuse) even though there is no abuse. Judges err
on the side of caution even to the point of allowing the man to be
punished simply because he was accused by an angry and irrational wife,
not convicted. And it works.

In this case the man is a child molester, he molests children. Should he
get custody just because he pays support? Why can't you be honest and
answer a simple question?

But you have never answered *this* question, DVD. Why can't you be honest
and answer it?

Woman finds out she is pregnant. She does not tell the father, but moves
out of town. A couple of years later she marries another guy, and they
raise the child together. She is their only child, and they do not tell her
that the man she calls Daddy is not her bio dad.

Meanwhile, the bio dad has moved on with his life, and eventually marries.
He and his wife have 4 children.

The daughter is a smart young lady, and does well in school. She begins to
apply to colleges her junior year in high school, but only applies to state
colleges, knowing that her parents cannot afford Ivy League. Her parents
tell her to go ahead and apply to Ivy League schools--the money will be
available. Mom then sues the bio dad for child support back to the birth
of the child.

Should she get it? Should the other 4 children of the bio dad lose out on
dance lessons, Little League, karate, and summer camp because the woman
waited 17 years before telling the guy that he was a father? Just how
should the courts decide the case?

"teachrmama" wrote in message
...

"DVD" wrote in message
[snip]

In this case the man is a child molester, he molests children. Should
he get custody just because he pays support? Why can't you be honest
and answer a simple question?

But you have never answered *this* question, DVD. Why can't you be
honest and answer it?

You MUST be mistaken. I read a reply that s/he made to me in which he
claims he always answers all questions put to him.
Phil #3


Woman finds out she is pregnant. She does not tell the father, but
moves
out of town. A couple of years later she marries another guy, and
they
raise the child together. She is their only child, and they do not
tell her
that the man she calls Daddy is not her bio dad.

Meanwhile, the bio dad has moved on with his life, and eventually
marries.
He and his wife have 4 children.

The daughter is a smart young lady, and does well in school. She
begins to
apply to colleges her junior year in high school, but only applies to
state
colleges, knowing that her parents cannot afford Ivy League. Her
parents
tell her to go ahead and apply to Ivy League schools--the money will
be
available. Mom then sues the bio dad for child support back to the
birth
of the child.

Should she get it? Should the other 4 children of the bio dad lose
out on
dance lessons, Little League, karate, and summer camp because the
woman
waited 17 years before telling the guy that he was a father? Just how
should the courts decide the case?

"Phil" wrote in message
news

"teachrmama" wrote in message
...

"DVD" wrote in message
[snip]

In this case the man is a child molester, he molests children. Should he
get custody just because he pays support? Why can't you be honest and
answer a simple question?

But you have never answered *this* question, DVD. Why can't you be
honest and answer it?

You MUST be mistaken. I read a reply that s/he made to me in which he
claims he always answers all questions put to him.
Phil #3


So he claims. He said that he felt that a woman who kept knowledge of a
child from a man for 10 years should be entitled to child support back to
the birth of the child. But he has consistently ignored *this* question. I
think I have posted it 5 times now.





Woman finds out she is pregnant. She does not tell the father, but moves
out of town. A couple of years later she marries another guy, and they
raise the child together. She is their only child, and they do not tell
her
that the man she calls Daddy is not her bio dad.

Meanwhile, the bio dad has moved on with his life, and eventually
marries.
He and his wife have 4 children.

The daughter is a smart young lady, and does well in school. She begins
to
apply to colleges her junior year in high school, but only applies to
state
colleges, knowing that her parents cannot afford Ivy League. Her parents
tell her to go ahead and apply to Ivy League schools--the money will be
available. Mom then sues the bio dad for child support back to the
birth
of the child.

Should she get it? Should the other 4 children of the bio dad lose out
on
dance lessons, Little League, karate, and summer camp because the woman
waited 17 years before telling the guy that he was a father? Just how
should the courts decide the case?

"teachrmama" wrote in message
...

"Phil" wrote in message
news

"teachrmama" wrote in message
...

"DVD" wrote in message
[snip]

In this case the man is a child molester, he molests children.
Should he get custody just because he pays support? Why can't you
be honest and answer a simple question?

But you have never answered *this* question, DVD. Why can't you be
honest and answer it?

You MUST be mistaken. I read a reply that s/he made to me in which he
claims he always answers all questions put to him.
Phil #3


So he claims. He said that he felt that a woman who kept knowledge of
a child from a man for 10 years should be entitled to child support
back to the birth of the child. But he has consistently ignored
*this* question. I think I have posted it 5 times now.

And others when the answer would be uncomfortable.
Phil #3






Woman finds out she is pregnant. She does not tell the father, but
moves
out of town. A couple of years later she marries another guy, and
they
raise the child together. She is their only child, and they do not
tell her
that the man she calls Daddy is not her bio dad.

Meanwhile, the bio dad has moved on with his life, and eventually
marries.
He and his wife have 4 children.

The daughter is a smart young lady, and does well in school. She
begins to
apply to colleges her junior year in high school, but only applies
to state
colleges, knowing that her parents cannot afford Ivy League. Her
parents
tell her to go ahead and apply to Ivy League schools--the money will
be
available. Mom then sues the bio dad for child support back to the
birth
of the child.

Should she get it? Should the other 4 children of the bio dad lose
out on
dance lessons, Little League, karate, and summer camp because the
woman
waited 17 years before telling the guy that he was a father? Just
how
should the courts decide the case?