If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
deadbeat and enabler list (another thread that went off topic)
Kenneth S. wrote:
Why is the DBP crew in every group, discussion, topic, and thread when it is [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] Is it possible to stop trying to bash custodial parents, and allow one of these threads to just have replies relevant to the topic? I've been following this group for more than 10 years. As I see it, one of the group's functions is to provide those who read it with a wider perspective on the issue of "child support" (a payment that I try to remember always to put in quote marks, because the money isn't to support children--very obviously, the money is intended to support the mothers of the children in question). The wider perspective available here isn't to be found in the media in the U.S., because the media is almost universally feminist and politically correct in outlook. Here's one element in the wider perspective. "He should not be held responsible for having sex, only I should," you say. So "child support"--which is money you want to get from him--is a penalty for having sex? There's a name for those who get paid for having sex, and another name for those who pay to have sex. Those who pay to have sex are called "johns" by law enforcement. You may not want to think about the name assigned to those who accept payment for having sex. The simple truth about "child support" is that the rules all are derived from the fact that men pay it and women receive it. If any significant number of women had to pay it, the system would look ENTIRELY different. Also, there are indications in the research that there would be fewer divorces and fatherless families if women thought there was any danger that they would have to pay CS, not receive it. That is not true. There are a lot of men that are custodial parents, and the women are requeired to pay child support. If the rule is in fact derived from the simple fact men pay and women get, then the term would be mother and father, not custodial parent and non custodial parent. -- Message posted via FamilyKB.com http://www.familykb.com/Uwe/Forums.a...nting/200710/1 |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
deadbeat and enabler list (another thread that went off topic)
"Illiana" u38194@uwe wrote in message news:7996cd2fa0c2c@uwe... Why is the DBP crew in every group, discussion, topic, and thread when it is about child support? Is it possible for them to gripe anymore about something that is in place to help single parents take care of their children? I wonder why those people are so adamant about not paying child support. They all claim not to be deadbeats, or enablers, yet their comments, way of thinking, and bashing of the custodial parents tell a different story. A good place to get DBP's noticed is http://www.deadbeatparents.info I posted my childrens father there, and it gives me a chance to share with others. ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
deadbeat and enabler list (another thread that went off topic)
"Illiana via FamilyKB.com" u38194@uwe wrote in message news:79ada21023616@uwe... DB wrote: "Shadow36" wrote in I wonder why those people are so adamant about not paying child support. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] What I find more Interesting Is why this whackjob keeps making names up and posting the same crap over and over. She's on most people's kill file list, so her posts don't get read unless she comes up with a new name each time she posts. I just use her for entertainment as she's kept the board lively with her rhetoric! LOL She sure has a lot of free time for working 70 hours a week LOL On Usenet, you can be anything you want, even a law enforcement clerk working 70 hours per week! LOL I think you guys are paranoid. Can you prove I am on any ones kill file list, Uh, people do know whether or not they killfiled you--blocked your posts from coming to their computers. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
deadbeat and enabler list (another thread that went off topic)
"Illiana via FamilyKB.com" u38194@uwe wrote in message news:79ada35a0d518@uwe... Gini wrote: Why is the DBP crew in every group, discussion, topic, and thread when it is about child support? === Because you are crossposting to our usenet group. It's NOT your group. OK, to rephrase: Because you are crossposting to ACS on usenet? |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
deadbeat and enabler list (another thread that went off topic)
"Illiana via FamilyKB.com" u38194@uwe wrote in message news:79addffe777f7@uwe... Kenneth S. wrote: Why is the DBP crew in every group, discussion, topic, and thread when it is [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] Is it possible to stop trying to bash custodial parents, and allow one of these threads to just have replies relevant to the topic? I've been following this group for more than 10 years. As I see it, one of the group's functions is to provide those who read it with a wider perspective on the issue of "child support" (a payment that I try to remember always to put in quote marks, because the money isn't to support children--very obviously, the money is intended to support the mothers of the children in question). The wider perspective available here isn't to be found in the media in the U.S., because the media is almost universally feminist and politically correct in outlook. Here's one element in the wider perspective. "He should not be held responsible for having sex, only I should," you say. So "child support"--which is money you want to get from him--is a penalty for having sex? There's a name for those who get paid for having sex, and another name for those who pay to have sex. Those who pay to have sex are called "johns" by law enforcement. You may not want to think about the name assigned to those who accept payment for having sex. The simple truth about "child support" is that the rules all are derived from the fact that men pay it and women receive it. If any significant number of women had to pay it, the system would look ENTIRELY different. Also, there are indications in the research that there would be fewer divorces and fatherless families if women thought there was any danger that they would have to pay CS, not receive it. That is not true. There are a lot of men that are custodial parents, and the women are requeired to pay child support. If the rule is in fact derived from the simple fact men pay and women get, then the term would be mother and father, not custodial parent and non custodial parent. The VAST MAJORITY of custodial parents are mothers. Unless the mother really messed up or does not want custody, she will usually be granted custody. Why is the term for those who do not pay "deadbeat dad" rather than deadbeat parent? |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
deadbeat and enabler list (another thread that went off topic)
"Illiana via FamilyKB.com" u38194@uwe wrote in She sure has a lot of free time for working 70 hours a week LOL On Usenet, you can be anything you want, even a law enforcement clerk working 70 hours per week! LOL I think you guys are paranoid. Can you prove I am on any ones kill file list, As you said, you are not computer savvy! Lots of people read Usenet, but rarely post as they take a few minutes to read things that are worthwhile! They know the posters that are posting useful information, everything else they filter out with an ignore list which eliminates a lot of the flack that they just don't need to see. By now they've figure out your posts are full of tripe, Arrest all the dead beats, you keep beating the same old drum that previous Femwits used to beat. They are gone now because nobody responded to them! Right now you're just sparring with some of the long term regulars because you provide some entertainment for them, they will soon tire of you and put you on their Kill file list. So unless you have something useful to say, it's pointless posting here because nobody is reading it! :-) |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
deadbeat and enabler list (another thread that went off topic)
"Illiana via FamilyKB.com" u38194@uwe wrote in The simple truth about "child support" is that the rules all are derived from the fact that men pay it and women receive it. If any significant number of women had to pay it, the system would look ENTIRELY different. Also, there are indications in the research that there would be fewer divorces and fatherless families if women thought there was any danger that they would have to pay CS, not receive it. That is not true. There are a lot of men that are custodial parents, and the women are requeired to pay child support. And you know this how or are you just pulling that out of your ass! Did the government tell you that? LOL When you want a healthy debate, debate with the facts! look at real numbers before you spout such rhetoric!!!! If the rule is in fact derived from the simple fact men pay and women get, then the term would be mother and father, not custodial parent and non custodial parent. You are dealing with a government system, there is no individuality, just a case number! |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
deadbeat and enabler list (another thread that went off topic)
"teachrmama" wrote in message ... "Illiana via FamilyKB.com" u38194@uwe wrote in message news:79ada35a0d518@uwe... Gini wrote: Why is the DBP crew in every group, discussion, topic, and thread when it is about child support? === Because you are crossposting to our usenet group. It's NOT your group. OK, to rephrase: Because you are crossposting to ACS on usenet? == I've concluded that she doesn't even know what Usenet is. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
deadbeat and enabler list (another thread that went off topic)
"DB" wrote in message ... "Illiana via FamilyKB.com" u38194@uwe wrote in She sure has a lot of free time for working 70 hours a week LOL On Usenet, you can be anything you want, even a law enforcement clerk working 70 hours per week! LOL I think you guys are paranoid. Can you prove I am on any ones kill file list, As you said, you are not computer savvy! Lots of people read Usenet, but rarely post as they take a few minutes to read things that are worthwhile! They know the posters that are posting useful information, everything else they filter out with an ignore list which eliminates a lot of the flack that they just don't need to see. By now they've figure out your posts are full of tripe, Arrest all the dead beats, you keep beating the same old drum that previous Femwits used to beat. They are gone now because nobody responded to them! Right now you're just sparring with some of the long term regulars because you provide some entertainment for them, they will soon tire of you and put you on their Kill file list. So unless you have something useful to say, it's pointless posting here because nobody is reading it! :-) == She doesn't know where "here," is--She thinks "here" is there (FamilyKB). |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
deadbeat and enabler list (another thread that went off topic)
"Gini" wrote in So unless you have something useful to say, it's pointless posting here because nobody is reading it! :-) == She doesn't know where "here," is--She thinks "here" is there (FamilyKB). And that's a forum website with about 3 people! LOL |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CT: New Haven witch hunt for deadbeat fathers - notice that NO mothers were on their list... | Dusty | Child Support | 1 | April 5th 05 06:37 AM |
Guest Speaker: Dr. Rita Laws Topic: Topic: Why Kids Lie and What We Can Do About It | wexwimpy | Foster Parents | 0 | March 2nd 04 05:42 PM |
Waiting list for POFAK mailing list | Herself | General | 3 | October 15th 03 06:26 PM |
Waiting list for POFAK mailing list | Herself | Breastfeeding | 3 | October 15th 03 06:26 PM |