Bill Cosby - NAACP leaders stunned by remarks of prominent comedian

Bob LeChevalier wrote:

Christopher Weeks wrote:
Bob LeChevalier wrote:
you think girls having sex with dogs is fun! Wow!!! You are a real
sick person. Mentally sick, that is.

That's called bestiality.

How is bestiality harmful?

Oh come on! Everyone knows that HIV was created when Africans ****ed
monkeys...what are you thinking?

Oftentimes, what "everybody knows" turns out not to be true.

*More* often, what everybody knowz, turnz out to be *true*.

We don't know how "HIV was created".

Proof iz in clazzified CDC files, they juzt don't dare talk about it.
It'z not PC...

In article ,
Bob LeChevalier wrote:
(Herman Rubin) wrote:
It's the black people who do not pronounce it
right after hundreds of years being in contact with it.

No black person has had hundred of years being in contact with it.

Neither has any white person hundreds of years in contact
with it.

No claim was made about white people. I am pointing out how silly his
claim is.

Slavery was ended roughly a half century before
my parents came in contact with English, and what do you
think the slave owners spoke to their slaves?

As little as possible, and they were explicitly forbidden by law to
teach them.

They were explicitly forbidden by law in some places to
teach them to read and write, but there had to be a fair
amount of vocal communication. Were slaves doing cooking
forbidden to read recipes?
--
This address is for information only. I do not claim that these views
are those of the Statistics Department or of Purdue University.
Herman Rubin, Department of Statistics, Purdue University
Phone: (765)494-6054 FAX: (765)494-0558

On Fri, 28 May 2004 11:08:04 GMT, wrote:



Bob LeChevalier wrote:

Christopher Weeks wrote:
Bob LeChevalier wrote:
you think girls having sex with dogs is fun! Wow!!! You are a real
sick person. Mentally sick, that is.

That's called bestiality.

How is bestiality harmful?

Oh come on! Everyone knows that HIV was created when Africans ****ed
monkeys...what are you thinking?

Oftentimes, what "everybody knows" turns out not to be true.

*More* often, what everybody knowz, turnz out to be *true*.

We don't know how "HIV was created".

Proof iz in clazzified CDC files, they juzt don't dare talk about it.
It'z not PC...

Was it really black people having sex with apes? Why would an ape do
such a thing? :-)

Holger

http://www.mindspring.com/~holger1/holger1.htm

On Fri, 28 May 2004 01:13:04 GMT, "R. Steve Walz"
wrote:

Holger Dansk wrote:

On Wed, 26 May 2004 15:59:19 -0400, Bob LeChevalier
wrote:

But it would be wrong. And even "disrespect" does not successful
convey the utter contempt that they (and I) feel for racists like you.

You have to earn respect
-----------------
Nope, everyone deserves it gratis. If it's not given by someone,
then the reasons WHY exist and MUST BE EXAMINED! And blacks find
NOTHING *WORTH* respecting in this country!!

Well, at the risk of sounding trite, they can always go back to you know
where. But I wouldn't advise it. The blacks in Africa live terrible
lives.

It's important that you respect yourself, and you will not do that
sitting on the curb all day saying "muhfugger" and "racist". You have
to get off your ass and really strive to improve yourself.

and it's not done by poor language, making poor
grades, incorrect behavior, and the crimes that blacks commit, etc.
--------------------
They must be given what has to replace their business, the way they
survive, which may seem like crime. AND THEY MUST BE GIVEN IT BEFORE
BEING EXPECTED TO RELINQUISH THE OTHER!!! People have to EAT!! Most
dope dealers SUPPORT THEIR FAMILIES!! Disrespect for people who want
their family to go hungry is NATURAL!!

Not anyone wants your family to go hungry. Like Bill Cosby says, it
would be great if you would help yourself to be better by speaking
correctly and not stealing and killing so much.

and
then to idiotically say that all of the wrong things that you do is a
way of thumbing your nose at white people is irrational and indicative
of a sick mind.
Holger
-------------------------
YOU and YOUR FAILURE to grasp what happens and why is what is
indicative of YOUR mental sickness, it is called RACISM!!

See, it's an obsession with you, and you had better do something about
it. When you say your prayers at night do you say, "God protect me from
the racist."?

Seriously, that kind of obsession can put you in a mental hospital.

Steve

Holger

http://www.mindspring.com/~holger1/holger1.htm

(Herman Rubin) wrote:
As little as possible, and they were explicitly forbidden by law to
teach them.

They were explicitly forbidden by law in some places to
teach them to read and write, but there had to be a fair
amount of vocal communication.

Not necessarily between master and slave, except perhaps the house
slaves.

Were slaves doing cooking forbidden to read recipes?

Why would they have written recipes?

lojbab
--
lojbab
Bob LeChevalier, Founder, The Logical Language Group
(Opinions are my own; I do not speak for the organization.)
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org

"Bob LeChevalier" wrote in message
...
(Herman Rubin) wrote:
As little as possible, and they were explicitly forbidden by law to
teach them.

They were explicitly forbidden by law in some places to
teach them to read and write, but there had to be a fair
amount of vocal communication.

Not necessarily between master and slave, except perhaps the house
slaves.

Were slaves doing cooking forbidden to read recipes?

Why would they have written recipes?

where's the proof that they did not ?

Bob LeChevalier wrote:
wrote:

Those comments you question at the beginning of the post, are *Cosby's*
not mine. He has donated millions to support DAFNz in college. He has
a much better grasp of DAFNhood than you do, Bob.


Cosby is a comedian.

That's all you seem to be, too.

"Jasper PNL Mfg Co, LTD" wrote:
"Bob LeChevalier" wrote in message
.. .
(Herman Rubin) wrote:
As little as possible, and they were explicitly forbidden by law to
teach them.

They were explicitly forbidden by law in some places to
teach them to read and write, but there had to be a fair
amount of vocal communication.

Not necessarily between master and slave, except perhaps the house
slaves.

Were slaves doing cooking forbidden to read recipes?

Why would they have written recipes?

where's the proof that they did not ?

If they were given written recipes, that would be tacit admission of a
crime, specifically teaching them to read.

lojbab
--
lojbab
Bob LeChevalier, Founder, The Logical Language Group
(Opinions are my own; I do not speak for the organization.)
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org

"Bob LeChevalier" wrote in message
...
"Jasper PNL Mfg Co, LTD" wrote:
"Bob LeChevalier" wrote in message
.. .
(Herman Rubin) wrote:
As little as possible, and they were explicitly forbidden by law to
teach them.

They were explicitly forbidden by law in some places to
teach them to read and write, but there had to be a fair
amount of vocal communication.

Not necessarily between master and slave, except perhaps the house
slaves.

Were slaves doing cooking forbidden to read recipes?

Why would they have written recipes?

where's the proof that they did not ?

If they were given written recipes, that would be tacit admission of a
crime, specifically teaching them to read.

'some places'

do you have proof that there were NO written recipes in ANY location ?

if not, your arguement is flawed

On Fri, 28 May 2004 17:06:48 -0400, Bob LeChevalier
wrote:

"Jasper PNL Mfg Co, LTD" wrote:
"Bob LeChevalier" wrote in message
. ..
(Herman Rubin) wrote:
As little as possible, and they were explicitly forbidden by law to
teach them.

They were explicitly forbidden by law in some places to
teach them to read and write, but there had to be a fair
amount of vocal communication.

Not necessarily between master and slave, except perhaps the house
slaves.

Were slaves doing cooking forbidden to read recipes?

Why would they have written recipes?

where's the proof that they did not ?

If they were given written recipes, that would be tacit admission of a
crime, specifically teaching them to read.

There were no policemen hanging out in kitchens to see if anyone was
learning to read. Not anyone gave a damn much one way or another
whether they could read or not including law enforcement idiots.

lojbab

Holger

http://www.mindspring.com/~holger1/holger1.htm