A Parenting & kids forum. ParentingBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » ParentingBanter.com forum » alt.support » Child Support
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Government Report Extols Welfare Reform, Ignores Impact of Child Support Funds



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 2nd 06, 02:05 AM posted to alt.child-support,alt.support.divorce
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Government Report Extols Welfare Reform, Ignores Impact of Child Support Funds

http://mensnewsdaily.com/blog/2006/0...s-welfare.html

3/1/2006
Government Report Extols Welfare Reform, Ignores Impact of Child Support
Funds
by Mike LaSalle

Earlier this week, the House Ways and Means Human Resources Subcommittee
released the first in a series of reports extolling the virtues of welfare
reforms signed into law nearly a decade ago.

The report claims a 60 percent reduction in welfare rolls since the reforms
were implemented.
"Reducing welfare dependence was a major goal in 1996," said Ways and Means
Human Resources Subcommittee Chairman Wally Herger (R-CA). "Today we can
look back and see record improvements for families and children resulting
from the 1996 reforms. Additional welfare reforms included in the Deficit
Reduction Act, which the President just signed into law, are designed to
improve self-sufficiency and elevate even more vulnerable families out of
poverty in the years ahead."


But family advocate Melanie I. Cummings sees it differently.

Cummings told MND that the welfare reforms signed by then-President Clinton
in 1996 were ostensibly designed to "end the dependence of needy parents on
government benefits by promoting job preparation, work and marriage."

To that end, the 1996 Welfare Reform Law established a fixed-block grant
program known as TANF - the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program.
That "gave states record but fixed federal funds to provide for welfare
needs, in place of the open-ended entitlement program," said Cummings.
(Before enactment of the reforms, states received additional federal funds
whenever more families became dependent on welfare. )

The Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 cited by Rep. Herger provides an
additional $1 billion in federal funding to underwrite child care costs for
employed parents.

"The middle-class is subsidizing this cost by bringing in child support
dollars through direct payroll deductions," said Cummings. "Middle-class
NCPs (Non-Custodial Parents) have higher child support burdens, which means
more monies for the states. This was not the intention of Welfare Reform."

According to Cummings, some Child Support funds collected by the states from
NCPs are never actually distributed either to the child or the Custodial
Parent. In that case, states place the NCP's payments into an "abandoned
property" account - while continuing to collect federal funds meant for
children they are no longer serving. The states are allowed to keep all the
funds for their own discretionary use - and no monies are ever distributed
to their rightful owners.

"The states are not required by any law to look for the NCP, child or CP,"
said Cummings. "States need to reconcile their books. Some of these children
have been emancipated and some NCPs are deceased. If an NCP paid but the
funds were never distributed, the funds should be returned to the payer -
not forfeited to the state. I brought this up with the Senate Finance
Committe myself. They were not pleased. Follow-up is needed."


In the months ahead, the Ways and Means Committee is expected to issue more
reports leading up to the 10th anniversary of the signing of the 1996 Law on
August 22, 2006.

Primary source PDF document: 1996 Welfare Reforms Reduce Welfare Dependence


  #2  
Old March 2nd 06, 02:33 AM posted to alt.child-support,alt.support.divorce
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Government Report Extols Welfare Reform, Ignores Impact of Child Support Funds


"Dusty" wrote in message
...

http://mensnewsdaily.com/blog/2006/0...s-welfare.html

3/1/2006
Government Report Extols Welfare Reform, Ignores Impact of Child Support
Funds
by Mike LaSalle

Earlier this week, the House Ways and Means Human Resources Subcommittee
released the first in a series of reports extolling the virtues of welfare
reforms signed into law nearly a decade ago.

The report claims a 60 percent reduction in welfare rolls since the

reforms
were implemented.
"Reducing welfare dependence was a major goal in 1996," said Ways and

Means
Human Resources Subcommittee Chairman Wally Herger (R-CA). "Today we can
look back and see record improvements for families and children resulting
from the 1996 reforms. Additional welfare reforms included in the Deficit
Reduction Act, which the President just signed into law, are designed to
improve self-sufficiency and elevate even more vulnerable families out of
poverty in the years ahead."


But family advocate Melanie I. Cummings sees it differently.

Cummings told MND that the welfare reforms signed by then-President

Clinton
in 1996 were ostensibly designed to "end the dependence of needy parents

on
government benefits by promoting job preparation, work and marriage."

To that end, the 1996 Welfare Reform Law established a fixed-block grant
program known as TANF - the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families

program.
That "gave states record but fixed federal funds to provide for welfare
needs, in place of the open-ended entitlement program," said Cummings.
(Before enactment of the reforms, states received additional federal funds
whenever more families became dependent on welfare. )

The Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 cited by Rep. Herger provides an
additional $1 billion in federal funding to underwrite child care costs

for
employed parents.

"The middle-class is subsidizing this cost by bringing in child support
dollars through direct payroll deductions," said Cummings. "Middle-class
NCPs (Non-Custodial Parents) have higher child support burdens, which

means
more monies for the states. This was not the intention of Welfare Reform."

According to Cummings, some Child Support funds collected by the states

from
NCPs are never actually distributed either to the child or the Custodial
Parent. In that case, states place the NCP's payments into an "abandoned
property" account - while continuing to collect federal funds meant for
children they are no longer serving. The states are allowed to keep all

the
funds for their own discretionary use - and no monies are ever distributed
to their rightful owners.

"The states are not required by any law to look for the NCP, child or CP,"
said Cummings. "States need to reconcile their books. Some of these

children
have been emancipated and some NCPs are deceased. If an NCP paid but the
funds were never distributed, the funds should be returned to the payer -
not forfeited to the state. I brought this up with the Senate Finance
Committe myself. They were not pleased. Follow-up is needed."


In the months ahead, the Ways and Means Committee is expected to issue

more
reports leading up to the 10th anniversary of the signing of the 1996 Law

on
August 22, 2006.

Primary source PDF document: 1996 Welfare Reforms Reduce Welfare

Dependence

And then there is the law of unintended consequences that the government
ignores.

Welfare to work legislation limited welfare benefits to five years in most
states. Welfare recipients have taken steps to get themselves declared
"disabled" usually based on drug and alcohol addictions. Dollars that were
previously paid out as time limited welfare benefits is now paid out as
permanent disability benefits.

The game is the welfare program administrators crow about all the savings
they have accomplished for the taxpayers while the disability program
administrators remain silent about the rapid increase in the expenditures
they make that cost taxpayers.

The law of unintended consequences has created a permanent welfare class we
now call the disabled.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A dentist's child abuse crime (also: Pregnant citizens: URGENT) Todd Gastaldo Pregnancy 1 September 7th 05 11:00 PM
<----------- KANE nineballgirl Spanking 2 September 30th 04 07:26 PM
Mother's Paternity Fraud - US Supreme Court Case TrashBBRT Child Support 8 May 21st 04 05:52 PM
Sample Supreme Court Petition Wizardlaw Child Support 0 January 16th 04 04:47 AM
| | Kids should work... Kane Foster Parents 3 December 9th 03 12:53 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 ParentingBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.