ACLU to end fluoridation? (also: Terry Polevoy, MD)

ACLU TO END FLUORIDATION?

ALSO: TERRY POLEVOY, MD (Polevoy discussion toward the end)...


California ACLU (North and South): You guys HAVE to read The Fluoride
Deception by Christopher Bryson. [2004]

Hopefully, you guys at ACLU have *already read* The Fluoride Deception and
are working to stop involuntary low dose fluoride ion chemotherapy
("fluoridation")...


FACT: Even if the toxic, fluoride ion chemotherapy "works"...

INVOLUNTARY MASS CHEMOTHERAPY VIOLATES OUR CIVIL LIBERTY NOT TO BE MEDICATED
(see THOR below)...

(Incredibly, the toxin known as "fluoride" may not even prevent cavities
nearly as well as has been claimed! Again, see The Fluoride Deception
[2004].)

The California Supreme Court wrote in the 1993 case of Daniel Thor v. The
Superior Court of Solano County 93 C.D.O.S. 5658:

"The common law has long recognized this principle: A physician who
performs any medical procedure without the patient's consent commits a
battery irrespective of the skill or care used." [Thor at 5659]

In California, people without medical degrees (state and county elected
officials) are practicing medicine - generally without medical licenses -
engaging in the medical procedure of injecting hydrofluorosilicic acid into
drinking water supplies - committing mass battery. See THOR, just quoted.

Mass battery against children is MASS CHILD ABUSE.

I have encouraged California attorney Kyle Nordrehaug to file 11166PC
Suspected Child Abuse Reports in the Escondido fluoridation case and to ask
Judge Dana M. Sabraw (or which ever
judge is now on the case) for an IMMEDIATE end to fluoridation in Escondido,
California.

See Fluoridation as 'battery' (attn: Chris Bryson - and Atty Doug Balog)
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/2658

See also: Chiropractors to End Fluoridation?
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/2659

In regard to this latter post, I am hoping California ACLU (North and South)
will help give California chiropractors some spine.

I want to see an end to fluoridation in California by the end of July - in
time for Prof. Paul Connett's 1st Citizen's Conference on Fluoride.

For details on Prof. Connett's 1st Citizen's Conference on Fluoride...

See The Disneyland DA and The Fluoride Deception...
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/2629

THE DISNEYLAND DA

SILENT TONY...

Disneyland DA Tony Rackauckas's campaign manager was California Chiropractic
Association ("freedom of choice in healthcare") Honorary Member Michael
Schroeder, former chairman of the California Republican Party.

Disneyland DA Tony's spokeswoman - Deputy DA Susan Kang
Schroeder - is Attorney Michael Schroeder's wife.

Disneyland DA Tony is BIG on making tap water safe so mothers can give it to
their babies. I quoted him in: The Disneyland DA and The Fluoride
Deception, URL above.

WHY is DA TONY silent - dragging his feet as residents in his jurisdiction
are being forcibly medicated with a toxin that may not even prevent cavities
nearly as well as has been claimed?

"Fluoridation" (involuntary mass chemotherapy) is OBVIOUS mass child abuse
even if the stuff DOES prevent lots of cavities! See THOR, quoted above.

If California ACLU were to speak out, the California Chiropratic
Association - vaunted defender of "freedom of choice in health care" - might
finally grow a spine and speak out too.

Thanks for reading.

Sincerely,

Todd

Dr. Gastaldo


PS "QUACKBUSTER" BARRETT is such a kidder!

BARRETT PROMOTES PUTTING A KNOWN POISON IN DRINKING WATER...

AS HE CALLS PEOPLE WHO *DON'T* WANT POISON IN THEIR WATER "POISONMONGERS"!

See Fluoridation: Don't Let the Poisonmongers Scare You!
http://www.quackwatch.org/03HealthPr.../fluoride.html


FIRST BARRETT LOST TO DARLENE SHERRELL...

"The Law Offices of Carlos F. Negrete and Health Freedom Legal Defense
Council agreed to accept Darlene Sherrell's case in order to give a voice to
the anti-fluoridation movement and defend Sherrell..."
http://www.healthfreedomlaw.com/Welc...jor%20News.htm

"In yet another MAJOR VICTORY for the Anti-Fluoride Movement and a setback
for Stephen Barrett (self-described "expert" on "quackery"), a Federal Court
Judge in Eugene, Oregon, has ruled that Barrett could not prove his case
against well known anti-fluoridation advocate, Darlene Sherrell....The was
Barrett's first trial for defamation. This, even though he has managed to
obtain settlements from other individuals that he has targeted in similar
lawsuits..."

I'll cc Sherrell's attorney, CARLOS F. NEGRETE, 27422 Calle Arroyo, San Juan
Capistrano, CA 92675-2747
Telephone (949) 493-8115
Fax (949) 493-8170
e-mail:

Attorney Negrete is in California. He will want to stop the mass child
abuse IMMEDIATELY - and thereby gain the ULTIMATE VICTORY for the
Anti-Fluoride Movement.

MORE ON DARLENE SHERRELL - ALSO MARTHA BEVIS...

Bryson writes of Darlene Sherrell and Martha Bevis:

""Two citizen activists, neither of them scientists, had torn away the
flimsy garment that had concealed a half-century of scientific deception."
[2004:221]

Bryson writes that "It was only with the help of Florida's Senator Bob
Graham that Sherrell won a response in 1990 from the NAS, to whom she
pointed out the error."

THIS IS INCREDIBLE: Sherell and Bevis forced the National Academy of
Sciences/NAS/National Research Council/NRC to admit, in effect, that the 3%
of Americans who consume 5 liters of water per day can - in 10 years' time -
be suffering "crippling skeletal fluorosis" if their water contains 2ppm
fluoride - HALF the EPA's maximum permissible fluoride level of 4ppm.

What does consumption of 1ppm for 40 years do to a person?

I wonder what skeletal fluorosis feels like BEFORE it becomes "crippling"...

Bryson suggests "musculoskeletal and other ailments":

"[T]he generation of baby boomers who have ingested a lifetime of
fluoridated water...may be suffering a variety of musculoskeletal [chiros,
you reading?] and other health ailments that can be traced back to [Atom
Bomb toxicologist Harold Hodge's] false promise that fluoride in water was
safe." [Bryson C. The Fluoride Deception 2004:221, text in brackets is mine]

Incidentally, CDC did not address the fact that fluoridation is mass child
abuse even if it prevents cavities...

Instead, CDC focused on the skeletal fluorosis issue....

See Dr. Gastaldo replies to CDC's Homer Simpson (someone writing from
nccDOHinfo@c...)
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/2656

Subsequent to that, CDC pulled the ol' "we're putting toxic waste in the
water because poor kids don't have dentists" gag...

See DOH! Is CDC's Homer Simpson creating violent kids? (Read Westendorf -
and Masters and Coplan)
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/2657


BARRETT ALSO LOST TO ILENA ROSENTHAL...

Barrett lost his libel suit against Ilena Rosenthal...

ACLU/EFF (Ann Brick and Lee Tien) acted as Ilena's friend of the court...
http://www.aclunc.org/cyber/040416-effltr.pdf

The California Supreme Court denied Barrett a re-hearing - but granted one
for Rosenthal - voting 7-0 to review the appellate court's decision in the
last matter in Barrett v. Rosenthal - the matter pertaining to Terry
Polevoy, MD...
www.humanticsfoundation.com/quacklibelsuit.htm

TERRY POLEVOY, MD...

Terry once mentioned me publicly on the "quackbusters" healthfraud list
(from which I had been previously censored in violation of listowner Rebecca
Long's rules - soon after which the healthfraud list shut down for awhile -
and when it came back - Barrett was the new "enforcer" - I think that was
the title they gave him)...

Anyway Terry wrote on the "quackbusters" healthfraud list:

"If CMCC moves to York University, will the Senate and academic committee
hire Todd Gastaldo to be a visiting professor of obstetrics, chiro style?"
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...st/message/930


Terry was humorously alluding to the fact that I protest MDs knowingly
closing birth canals up to 30% - and he doesn't care...

Since ending this obvious MD crime is my priority, I will bore people with
my usual public service announcement...

OBs are knowingly closing birth canals up to 30%...

For simple PROOF - and simple instructions on how pregnant women can allow
their birth canals to OPEN the "extra" up to 30%...

See I ain't no Semmelweis, but...
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/2591

With birth canals senselessly closed, OBs are pushing violently on tiny
spines
(with oxytocin/Cytotec) and pulling gruesomely (with hands, forceps,
vaccuum)...

Sometimes OBs pull so hard they rip spinal nerves out of tiny spinal cords.

Some babies die, some are paralyzed - most "only" have their necks
gruesomely
wrenched.

ALL spinal manipulation is gruesome with the birth canal closed.

OBs are *saying* they are allowing the birth canal to open maximally when
shoulders get stuck...

But they are actually KEEPING birth canals closed when babies' shoulders get
stuck.

See ACOG birth crime video evidence
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/2300

RELATED MASS ADULT ABUSE...

OBs are SLICING VAGINAS en masse (euphemism "routine episiotomy") -
surgically/fraudulently inferring everything possible is being done to OPEN
birth canals - even as they CLOSE birth canals - up to 30%.

OBs are also slicing ABDOMENS en mass ("c-section") -
surgically/fraudulently
inferring they HAVE done everything possible to open birth canals even as
they
close birth canals.

Why did Terrry Polevoy, MD make fun of "chiro style" obstetrics (allowing
birth canals to open maximally)?

Why isn't he helping to stop his fellow MDs' birth-canal-closing (sometimes
fatal) obstetric obstetric quackery?

I do hope the California Supreme Court renders a judgement against Terry
Polevoy, MD and in favor of Ilena Rosenthal.

In the meantime, hopefully ACLU will use the California Supreme Court THOR
decision to stop the mass child abuse euphemistically known as
"fluoridation."

ACLU assistance in stopping the mass (sometimes fatal) child abuse
euphemistically known as "medical childbirth" would also be helpful.

ACLU could bring the c-section and episiotomy rates WAY down - just by
legally compelling OBs and CNMwives to start allowing birth canals to open
maximally.

Maximal outlet area at birth has to be one of the most important American
civil liberties...

Thanks for reading.

Sincerely,

Todd

Dr. Gastaldo


PS Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation/SLAPPs...

NOTE TO ILENA: I hope this post does not hurt your cause before the Court.
I was reading recently about the judge deciding that you had been SLAPPed
and I started thinking of the significance of my Oregon attorney's mention
that the abovementioned Attorney Schroeder's lawsuit against me was a SLAPP.
I had to switch to a Calfornia attorney and lost on jurisdiction - and never
really grokked what a SLAPP is - and how easy they are to defeat usually.
My inattention cost me a $25,000 default judgement - which I recently paid.
I still owe court costs and interest though.

Attorney Schroeder sued me for one million dollars, complaining about my
statement that he "bilked" DC licensing fees from the People of the State of
California...

Attorney David Prescott (formerly a law school dean and law professor)
writes:

"Mr. Schroeder represented the California Board of Chiropractic Examiners in
litigation related the the chiropractic scope of practice in California
during the period from 1998 [sic] to 1991. It is Prescott's opinion that
Mr. Schroeder's analysis of the California Chiropractic Act was, as
presented to the California courts, as flawed as his analysis of the
"prepay" issue and that neither the chiropractic profession nor the patient
population is well served by the outcome of the litigation handled by Mr.
Schroeder. The case was actually not litigated to a decision as the
California Board of Chiropractors ran out of money after paying Mr.
Schroeder in excess of $700,000.00 attorney's fees and gave up and settled
the case."
http://www.promedlaw.com/medical%20articles.htm

Could Attorney Schroeder's analysis have been INTENTIONALLY flawed? I still
think so.

I still think the 10 MD-obstetricians who sued the California Board of
Chiropractic Examiners did so - not to overturn Schroeder's Rule 302 - but
to intentionally lose to Schroeder - to get Schroeder's Rule 302 JUDICIALLY
RUBBERSTAMPED.

The 10 MD-obstetricians LIKED the fact that Schroeder's Rule 302 explicitly
made it illegal for DCs - who used to attend thousands of homebirths - to so
much as sever the umbilical cord.

The 10 MD-obstetricians very likely did not want California DCs thinking -
much less protesting - the FACT that MD-obstetricians are knowingly closing
birth canals and gruesomely (sometimes fatally) manipulating most babies'
spines.

See $25,000 for OC chiros for Disneyland antifluoridation work?
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/2643

I have now paid "chiropractic" Attorney Schroeder the substantial part of
the default judgement he won - and STILL this "chiropractic" attorney is
doing nothing to stop MD-obstetricians from closing birth canals and
gruesomely manipulating most babies spines.

"Chiropractic" attorney Schroeder - and the chiropractic profession he so
powerfully influences - are mysteriously missing a GOLDEN opportunity to
save tiny lives and tiny limbs and PREVENT more putative vertebral
subluxations than DCs will ever be able to adjust by hand.

Maybe the ACLU can give them some spine.

Ilena, thanks for all that you do to inform women of the risks of breast
implants.

Again, I hope that this post does not hurt your cause before the Court.

Thanks for reading,

Todd

Dr. Gastaldo



Copied to various ACLU Northern and Southern California addressees

This post will be archived for global access within 24 hours in the Google
usenet archive. Search http://groups.google.com for "ACLU to end
fluoridation? (also: Terry Polevoy, MD; also SLAPPs)"