A Parenting & kids forum. ParentingBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » ParentingBanter.com forum » misc.kids » General
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Sometimes a Brat Is Just A Brat



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 3rd 05, 08:11 PM
Kent
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Sometimes a Brat Is Just A Brat

Don't be one of those parents who lets your kid get like this!

http://tinyurl.com/8t5eo


Sometimes A Brat Is Just A Brat Who Needs A Spank
May 3, 2005
By LOENARD PITTS

Put the handcuffs aside. We'll get back to them in a minute.

Frankly, there's something else on that video that troubles me almost
as much. And if you're saying to yourself, "What video?" well ...
welcome home. How are things in the rainforest?

Here in the States, everybody's talking about a much-televised video -
shot in March but made public last week - of a 5-year-old in St.
Petersburg, Fla., being taken into custody by police officers after
throwing a tantrum at school. Ja'eisha Scott cries out as her arms are
pinioned behind her.

As I said, we'll get to that. For now, let's talk about what the
half-hour video shows in the moments before police arrive. I've seen
temper tantrums before - I've got five kids - but this one was
different. Not because the child seemed out of control but, rather,
because she seemed so very much in control.

This wasn't stomping and shouting and throwing a fit. This was walking
over to a shelf and sweeping items off it. Walking to a wall and
snatching photos down. Walking across the room to pick things up and
break them. Walking back and forth, in no apparent hurry, methodically
wrecking the room with the calm deliberateness of someone who knows you
can't do a thing to stop her. And then punching at the hapless
administrator who kept telling her this behavior was "unacceptable."

Beg pardon, but am I the only benighted member of the old school who
wanted to spank that child's backside?

Not "beat." Not "abuse." But spank? Definitely.

Granted, I don't know anything about this girl. Maybe she has emotional
problems. Maybe she's been mistreated. Maybe there are mitigating
factors. In which case, I'll be the first to admit I'm wrong.

But assuming I'm not, assuming Ja'eisha is what she appears - a brat in
a snit - you have to ask yourself if anybody has ever laid down the law
to her, said no and made it stick, socialized her. It's a job, I hasten
to add, that begins not with schools, but with parents.

Of course, no one seems to be doing the job these days, so tremulous
are we about bruising fragile self-esteem. Small wonder we wind up in a
place where adults are helpless before the furies of children.

What happened in St. Pete is but the most widely publicized episode in
what seems a mini-epidemic. Last year, a kindergartner in St. Louis was
handcuffed for disruptive behavior. Last week, a 7-year-old in
Bethlehem, W.Va., wound up wearing jailhouse bracelets for much the
same reason.

Can it be just coincidence that we're also seeing a not-so-mini
epidemic of parents defending and rationalizing the misbehavior of
their little terrors? I'm thinking of the parents in Kansas who
harassed a teacher for flunking kids who cheated on a project. Of the
mother in Greater Chicago who dismissed her daughter's part in a mob
assault as something that just "got out of hand." Of the mother in New
Orleans who blamed the school - school with security guards and metal
detectors - after her son and another boy shot each other.

And I'm thinking of Ja'eisha's mother, Inga Akins, saying on television
that her daughter's misbehavior stemmed from the fact that she doesn't
get along with "Miss D" - presumably assistant principal Nicole
Dibenedetto, seen in the video deflecting the child's punches. Beg
pardon again, but ... who cares? How does the fact that a 5-year-old
doesn't like somebody justify her behaving like a hellion?

Akins has a lawyer and he's talking lawsuit. Fine. The police
overreacted. You don't handcuff 5-year-olds. But you shouldn't feel
that you have to.

So I hope mom doesn't do what we too often do when our kids misbehave
these days: Make it not their fault. Tell them they are victims. Spare
them the burden of onus.

I hope that between media interviews, Akins is getting her child
straight. Otherwise, I can promise you one thing:

Someday, you'll see Ja'eisha in handcuffs again.

Leonard Pitts Jr. is a syndicated columnist in Washington.



  #2  
Old May 4th 05, 04:14 AM
toto
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 03 May 2005 19:11:04 GMT, "Kent"
wrote:

http://tinyurl.com/8t5eo

Link to the video clip.

http://www.sptimesphotos.com/video/office.html

It certainly does not seem that the child needed
to be handcuffed and arrested by police.

Unfortunately, the mother apparently would not come to get
the child until she got off work so the school personel were
in a situation where they would have had to have a principal
or teacher or aide staying with her and monitoring her until
that time.

I wonder about the emergency contacts and why they could
not retrieve the child. It seems that she needed to be picked
up at the earliest time possible and when mom is not available,
every school I ever worked in had other people to call as
backup to pick her up.

Link to a more detailed story about the incident itself he
http://www.sptimes.com/2005/04/22/So...olice_ha.shtml

Archived article he
http://snipurl.com/endu


--
Dorothy

There is no sound, no cry in all the world
that can be heard unless someone listens ..

The Outer Limits
  #3  
Old May 4th 05, 04:31 AM
Nan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 03 May 2005 22:14:31 -0500, toto
wrote:

On Tue, 03 May 2005 19:11:04 GMT, "Kent"
wrote:

http://tinyurl.com/8t5eo


Kent is a reg in the childfree group, so I'd bet the author of that
article is probably CF as well.

Link to the video clip.

http://www.sptimesphotos.com/video/office.html

It certainly does not seem that the child needed
to be handcuffed and arrested by police.


Agreed. However, the principal was ineffective in her approach. When
I worked at the women's shelter, a child that behaved like that would
have been restrained by staff in what we called a "basket hold". It
was very effective in getting the child to calm down.

Unfortunately, the mother apparently would not come to get
the child until she got off work so the school personel were
in a situation where they would have had to have a principal
or teacher or aide staying with her and monitoring her until
that time.


I'll play devil's advocate and say I wouldn't want to be in the
position of having to monitor the child for possibly an entire day
just because the mother couldn't be bothered to come get her. I
wouldn't have called the police, but I may have referred the situation
to DFS or a similar agency.

I wonder about the emergency contacts and why they could
not retrieve the child. It seems that she needed to be picked
up at the earliest time possible and when mom is not available,
every school I ever worked in had other people to call as
backup to pick her up.

Link to a more detailed story about the incident itself he
http://www.sptimes.com/2005/04/22/So...olice_ha.shtml

Archived article he
http://snipurl.com/endu


Nan

  #4  
Old May 4th 05, 05:02 AM
dragonlady
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
Nan wrote:

Unfortunately, the mother apparently would not come to get
the child until she got off work so the school personel were
in a situation where they would have had to have a principal
or teacher or aide staying with her and monitoring her until
that time.


I'll play devil's advocate and say I wouldn't want to be in the
position of having to monitor the child for possibly an entire day
just because the mother couldn't be bothered to come get her.


That's kind of harsh. You don't know the mother's position. She may
have been in a position that she would get fired if she left her post,
or where she was the only clerk on duty in a store and couldn't leave
until the next person came in. She may not have had transportation
until her shift ended. There are lots of people who cannot walk off
their job without getting fired.

She may have been called to the school frequently, and her boss said,
"Once more and you're fired."

"Couldn't be bothered" is uncalled for unless you know all of the
circumstances.

Apparenty, at least part of the problem was that, instead of campus
police, who are trained specifically to work with out of control
children, the city police were called.

But you're right: I would not want to have to be responsible for a
child who was trashing a room and hitting me for the rest of the day.
--
Children won't care how much you know until they know how much you care

  #5  
Old May 4th 05, 05:08 AM
Nan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 04 May 2005 04:02:18 GMT, dragonlady
wrote:

In article ,
Nan wrote:

Unfortunately, the mother apparently would not come to get
the child until she got off work so the school personel were
in a situation where they would have had to have a principal
or teacher or aide staying with her and monitoring her until
that time.


I'll play devil's advocate and say I wouldn't want to be in the
position of having to monitor the child for possibly an entire day
just because the mother couldn't be bothered to come get her.


That's kind of harsh. You don't know the mother's position. She may
have been in a position that she would get fired if she left her post,
or where she was the only clerk on duty in a store and couldn't leave
until the next person came in. She may not have had transportation
until her shift ended. There are lots of people who cannot walk off
their job without getting fired.

She may have been called to the school frequently, and her boss said,
"Once more and you're fired."

"Couldn't be bothered" is uncalled for unless you know all of the
circumstances.


True, and I don't know all of the circumstances. However, it is a
parent's responsibility to make sure there is available transportation
or supervision for their children. It's why the schools want
emergency contact info. The problem lies in parents that have the
mentality that the school is their free babysitter, and don't have
alternative plans for exceptional circumstances.

Apparenty, at least part of the problem was that, instead of campus
police, who are trained specifically to work with out of control
children, the city police were called.


Elementary schools around here don't have campus police.

But you're right: I would not want to have to be responsible for a
child who was trashing a room and hitting me for the rest of the day.


Nan

  #6  
Old May 4th 05, 05:22 AM
dragonlady
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
Nan wrote:

True, and I don't know all of the circumstances. However, it is a
parent's responsibility to make sure there is available transportation
or supervision for their children. It's why the schools want
emergency contact info. The problem lies in parents that have the
mentality that the school is their free babysitter, and don't have
alternative plans for exceptional circumstances.


I'm a little touchy on this one, having been called to school VERY often
for a short period of time. It became a real problem for me.
Ultimately, I quit one job so I could be more available for the child
who was in trouble. (She's doing fine now -- but it was a pretty rough
patch, and there WERE times when I had to tell the school they'd just
have to wait for a bit.)


Apparenty, at least part of the problem was that, instead of campus
police, who are trained specifically to work with out of control
children, the city police were called.


Elementary schools around here don't have campus police.


One of the articles specified that this school did, and that normally
the campus police would have been called. I figure it must either be a
K-12 campus, or a very large elementary school!


But you're right: I would not want to have to be responsible for a
child who was trashing a room and hitting me for the rest of the day.

--
Children won't care how much you know until they know how much you care

  #7  
Old May 4th 05, 05:33 AM
Nan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 04 May 2005 04:22:48 GMT, dragonlady
wrote:

In article ,
Nan wrote:

True, and I don't know all of the circumstances. However, it is a
parent's responsibility to make sure there is available transportation
or supervision for their children. It's why the schools want
emergency contact info. The problem lies in parents that have the
mentality that the school is their free babysitter, and don't have
alternative plans for exceptional circumstances.


I'm a little touchy on this one, having been called to school VERY often
for a short period of time. It became a real problem for me.
Ultimately, I quit one job so I could be more available for the child
who was in trouble. (She's doing fine now -- but it was a pretty rough
patch, and there WERE times when I had to tell the school they'd just
have to wait for a bit.)


You would have been a parent that most school admins understood,
though. You tried your best. As you say, I have no idea what the
mother's situation is, so I shouldn't pass judgment.

Apparenty, at least part of the problem was that, instead of campus
police, who are trained specifically to work with out of control
children, the city police were called.


Elementary schools around here don't have campus police.


One of the articles specified that this school did, and that normally
the campus police would have been called. I figure it must either be a
K-12 campus, or a very large elementary school!


Ah, I missed that part. Makes one wonder why the campus police
weren't called, then. As well as a school social worker.

Nan
  #8  
Old May 4th 05, 05:38 AM
toto
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 04 May 2005 03:31:29 GMT, Nan wrote:

It certainly does not seem that the child needed
to be handcuffed and arrested by police.


Agreed. However, the principal was ineffective in her approach. When
I worked at the women's shelter, a child that behaved like that would
have been restrained by staff in what we called a "basket hold". It
was very effective in getting the child to calm down.

I agree and I wondered about that myself, but.... I would bet that
the staff was not trained in this kind of technique and/or that there
is some school rule or legal problem with using it on a regular
ed student in a regular kindergarten classroom.

I have used that hold on children in a daycare setting and it
*is* much more effective and usually the children calm down
and want to sit on their own and either talk it out or at least
stop the mayhem. The problem is that if you are not properly
trained on it, you can hurt a child when you attempt it and
that may put the school in line for a lawsuit too. My suspicion
is that the training educators were put through emphasized
not touching the child. I also will say that with the fact that
this incident and others in Pinellas County are being touted
as racism since more black children are put in this situation
than white children, the other problem involved would be having
a white teacher restrain a black child. I would bet their would
be an outcry against any teacher who did that hold with a
child of another race. It can get pretty complicated.

Unfortunately, the mother apparently would not come to get
the child until she got off work so the school personel were
in a situation where they would have had to have a principal
or teacher or aide staying with her and monitoring her until
that time.


I'll play devil's advocate and say I wouldn't want to be in the
position of having to monitor the child for possibly an entire day
just because the mother couldn't be bothered to come get her. I
wouldn't have called the police, but I may have referred the
situation to DFS or a similar agency.

I am not sure that dcfs will come and pick a child up from school
whose mother *is* coming to get her at 3:15 pm which is what
the tape said the mom was doing.

I would not necessarily want to be in that situation as an emergency
contact, but that *is* an option if the mother cannot come - usually
the contacts are other relatives who are available during the day,
though neighbors are also used on occasion.

I wonder about the emergency contacts and why they could
not retrieve the child. It seems that she needed to be picked
up at the earliest time possible and when mom is not available,
every school I ever worked in had other people to call as
backup to pick her up.

Link to a more detailed story about the incident itself he
http://www.sptimes.com/2005/04/22/So...olice_ha.shtml

Archived article he
http://snipurl.com/endu



--
Dorothy

There is no sound, no cry in all the world
that can be heard unless someone listens ..

The Outer Limits
  #9  
Old May 4th 05, 05:47 AM
Nan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 03 May 2005 23:38:24 -0500, toto
wrote:

On Wed, 04 May 2005 03:31:29 GMT, Nan wrote:

It certainly does not seem that the child needed
to be handcuffed and arrested by police.


Agreed. However, the principal was ineffective in her approach. When
I worked at the women's shelter, a child that behaved like that would
have been restrained by staff in what we called a "basket hold". It
was very effective in getting the child to calm down.

I agree and I wondered about that myself, but.... I would bet that
the staff was not trained in this kind of technique and/or that there
is some school rule or legal problem with using it on a regular
ed student in a regular kindergarten classroom.

I have used that hold on children in a daycare setting and it
*is* much more effective and usually the children calm down
and want to sit on their own and either talk it out or at least
stop the mayhem. The problem is that if you are not properly
trained on it, you can hurt a child when you attempt it and
that may put the school in line for a lawsuit too. My suspicion
is that the training educators were put through emphasized
not touching the child. I also will say that with the fact that
this incident and others in Pinellas County are being touted
as racism since more black children are put in this situation
than white children, the other problem involved would be having
a white teacher restrain a black child. I would bet their would
be an outcry against any teacher who did that hold with a
child of another race. It can get pretty complicated.


I thought of that, too. Perhaps our agency was a bit more protected
since we served 'at risk' children, and we weren't a public agency.

I am not sure that dcfs will come and pick a child up from school
whose mother *is* coming to get her at 3:15 pm which is what
the tape said the mom was doing.


I really do wonder what she expected the school to do since she wasn't
planning to collect the child until after school... I agree the
handcuffing and arrest was over the top, given that the girl was
already sitting quietly by the time they arrived.

Nan
  #10  
Old May 4th 05, 06:08 AM
toto
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 04 May 2005 04:33:05 GMT, Nan wrote:

Ah, I missed that part. Makes one wonder why the campus police
weren't called, then. As well as a school social worker.

They were called. There are only 12 of them in the district and
they were unable to respond in a timely fashion so the city police
were called.

Nan



--
Dorothy

There is no sound, no cry in all the world
that can be heard unless someone listens ..

The Outer Limits
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Just a kid, or ungrateful brat? H Schinske General 0 July 11th 03 05:27 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 ParentingBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.