stability and visitation

MORE VISITATION RESULTS IN MORE CHILD SUPPORT BEING PAID! SEE THE STATISTICS
BELOW!
Feminist attorneys often use an argument for "stability" as an excuse to
minimize visitation for fathers. They claim moving a child back and forth to
the father causes instability and emotional problems for the child. This is
a red herring AND INTELLECTUALLY DISHONEST argument ! The only time the
stability argument rises is when it used is to try to limit contact with the
father. The stability argument ignores common sense, proven statistics and
studies. It ignores the real world situation today when children are
shuffled back and forth to day care, sunday school, school , the mothers
grandparents or babysitters etc because most women work full time. Why is it
more unsettling for a child to spend time with their father than with a
babysitter or day care? Will the Courts order the mother to stay home to
provide stability? Doesn't the fact that children cry and plead for more
time with their father give someone a clue that they are being emotionally
abused? Children need EMOTIONAL STABILITY, not a hypothetical physical
stability that cannot be provided when both parents work! See what happens
to children denied an effective relationship with their father on the
statistics page at http://www.fathersrights.org! See how to fight this
intellectually dishonest argument that would cause emotional abuse to your
children in the Guide to fathers rights at http://www.fathers-rights.com.

"dadslawyer" wrote in message
news:FpjGg.89505$LF4.56519@dukeread05...
MORE VISITATION RESULTS IN MORE CHILD SUPPORT BEING PAID! SEE THE
STATISTICS
BELOW!
Feminist attorneys often use an argument for "stability" as an excuse to
minimize visitation for fathers. They claim moving a child back and forth
to
the father causes instability and emotional problems for the child.

I agree! That's why the child should NOT be moved back and forth, rather
they should just stay with the father..........

This is
a red herring AND INTELLECTUALLY DISHONEST argument ! The only time the
stability argument rises is when it used is to try to limit contact with
the
father. The stability argument ignores common sense, proven statistics and
studies. It ignores the real world situation today when children are
shuffled back and forth to day care, sunday school, school , the mothers
grandparents or babysitters etc because most women work full time. Why is
it
more unsettling for a child to spend time with their father than with a
babysitter or day care?

Because EVERYONE knows that fathers are a danger to their own children.

Will the Courts order the mother to stay home to
provide stability? Doesn't the fact that children cry and plead for more
time with their father give someone a clue that they are being emotionally
abused? Children need EMOTIONAL STABILITY, not a hypothetical physical
stability that cannot be provided when both parents work! See what happens
to children denied an effective relationship with their father on the
statistics page at http://www.fathersrights.org! See how to fight this
intellectually dishonest argument that would cause emotional abuse to your
children in the Guide to fathers rights at http://www.fathers-rights.com.