If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Spanking Leads To Child Aggression And Anxiety, Regardless Of Cultural Norm
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...1114110820.htm
Source: Society for Research in Child Development The study grew out of existing controversies over whether parents should spank their children or use other forms of physical discipline. While some experts argue that physical discipline should never be used because of evidence that it is related to more, rather than fewer, child behavior problems and might escalate into physical abuse, others argue that the effects of physical discipline might depend on characteristics of children and families and the circumstances in which physical discipline is used. To find out if the latter theory was valid, researchers from Duke University in North Carolina, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Göteborg University in Sweden, the University of Naples, the University of Rome and the Istituto Universitario di Scienze Motorie in Italy, Chiang Mai University in Thailand, the University of Delhi in India, the University of Oregon and California State University-Long Beach questioned 336 mothers and their children in China, India, Italy, Kenya, the Philippines, and Thailand about cultural norms surrounding the use of physical discipline and how it affects children's aggression and anxiety. They first asked mothers how often they physically disciplined their children, and then asked mothers and children how often they thought other parents in their country physically disciplined their children. Finally, they asked mothers and children how often the child worries, is fearful, gets in fights, bullies others and other questions to measure children's aggression and anxiety. The researchers found differences in how often mothers used physical discipline and the mothers' perceptions of how often other parents used physical discipline. Specifically: * Mothers in Thailand were least likely to physically discipline their children, followed by mothers in China, the Philippines, Italy, India, and Kenya, with mothers in Kenya most likely to physically discipline their children. * More frequent use of physical discipline was less strongly associated with child aggression and anxiety when it was perceived as being more culturally accepted, but physical discipline was also associated with more aggression and anxiety regardless of the perception of cultural acceptance. * In countries in which physical discipline was more common and culturally accepted, children who were physically disciplined were less aggressive and less anxious than children who were physically disciplined in countries where physical discipline was rarely used. * In all countries, however, higher use of physical discipline was associated with more child aggression and anxiety. "One implication of our findings is the need for caution in making recommendations about parenting practices across different cultural groups," said lead researcher Jennifer Lansford, Ph.D., a research scientist at the Center for Child and Family Policy at Duke University. "A particular parenting practice may become a problem only if parents use it in a cultural context that does not support the practice (for example, if they migrate from one country to another)." However, she notes, some practices that were condoned historically (e.g., child labor) are now condemned, at least in certain countries. "A larger question is whether a parenting practice is acceptable, regardless of whether it occurs commonly within a cultural group." ### Summarized from Child Development, Vol. 76, Issue 6, Physical Discipline and Children's Adjustment: Cultural Normativeness as a Moderator by Lansford JE. Dodge KA Malone PS and Quinn N. (Duke University), Chang L (Chinese University of Hong Kong), Oburu P and Palmérus K (Göteborg University), Bacchini D (University of Naples), Pastorelli C and Bombi AS (Rome University), Zelli A (Istituto Universitario di Scienze Motorie), Tapanya S(Chiang Mai University), Chaudhary N (University of Delhi), Deater-Deckard K (University of Oregon), and Manke B (California State University, Long Beach). Copyright 2005 The Society for Research in Child Development, Inc. All rights reserved. Note: This story has been adapted from a news release issued by Society for Research in Child Development. http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...1114110820.htm |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Spanking Leads To Child Aggression And Anxiety, Regardless Of Cultural Norm
0:- wrote: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...1114110820.htm Source: Society for Research in Child Development .... * More frequent use of physical discipline was less strongly associated with child aggression and anxiety when it was perceived as being more culturally accepted, but physical discipline was also associated with more aggression and anxiety regardless of the perception of cultural acceptance. ... .... * In all countries, however, higher use of physical discipline was associated with more child aggression and anxiety. ... The silence is deafening. Will I simply get another babbling change of subject from Doan? Or will he continue to display his cowardice and shame his good family name? R R R R ....hihihi http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...1114110820.htm |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Spanking Leads To Child Aggression And Anxiety, Regardless OfCultural Norm
Well, I received a multitude of similar responses when I posted a
reference to this study. It's hard to accept defeat or to debate intelligently in light of solid evidence that refutes one's personal beliefs. When that happens, one can engage in avoidance, changing the subject, or verbal abuse. In my over ten years of involvement on this ng, and in working with families, children, and students, I'm familiar with all three strategies. None of the strategies change the evidence research has demonstrated. Hitting children is no more effective than alternative strategies that model, teach, and hold children accountable, and it carries the potential for both short and long term harm. We now have evidence that context and culture does not eliminate the potential for negative outcomes or decrease the effectiveness of alternative discipline strategies. LaVonne 0:- wrote: 0:- wrote: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...1114110820.htm Source: Society for Research in Child Development ... * More frequent use of physical discipline was less strongly associated with child aggression and anxiety when it was perceived as being more culturally accepted, but physical discipline was also associated with more aggression and anxiety regardless of the perception of cultural acceptance. ... ... * In all countries, however, higher use of physical discipline was associated with more child aggression and anxiety. ... The silence is deafening. Will I simply get another babbling change of subject from Doan? Or will he continue to display his cowardice and shame his good family name? R R R R ....hihihi http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...1114110820.htm |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Spanking Leads To Child Aggression And Anxiety, Regardless Of Cultural Norm
Carlson LaVonne wrote: Well, I received a multitude of similar responses when I posted a reference to this study. It's hard to accept defeat or to debate intelligently in light of solid evidence that refutes one's personal beliefs. When that happens, one can engage in avoidance, changing the subject, or verbal abuse. In my over ten years of involvement on this ng, and in working with families, children, and students, I'm familiar with all three strategies. None of the strategies change the evidence research has demonstrated. Hitting children is no more effective than alternative strategies that model, teach, and hold children accountable, and it carries the potential for both short and long term harm. We now have evidence that context and culture does not eliminate the potential for negative outcomes or decrease the effectiveness of alternative discipline strategies. I'm not going to hold my breath waiting for any comprehensive debate from the pro spank faction. Though doubtless they wish I would. 0:-] Kane LaVonne 0:- wrote: 0:- wrote: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...1114110820.htm Source: Society for Research in Child Development ... * More frequent use of physical discipline was less strongly associated with child aggression and anxiety when it was perceived as being more culturally accepted, but physical discipline was also associated with more aggression and anxiety regardless of the perception of cultural acceptance. ... ... * In all countries, however, higher use of physical discipline was associated with more child aggression and anxiety. ... The silence is deafening. Will I simply get another babbling change of subject from Doan? Or will he continue to display his cowardice and shame his good family name? R R R R ....hihihi http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...1114110820.htm |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Spanking Leads To Child Aggression And Anxiety, Regardless OfCultural Norm
First, the study is a correlation study. No CAUSATION can be implied. Thus, the claim that spanking "Leads" to child aggression and anxiety is bogus! Second, the authors themselves admitted that they included beatings that are certainly abusive in the USA in study. If you really want to debate this study, I am willing to give it a shot - no verbal abuse warranted. ;-) Wanna give me a try? My guess is you will be the one that do the avoidance and instead will use your little Kane9 to do the verbal abuse and attack for you. Doan On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, Carlson LaVonne wrote: Well, I received a multitude of similar responses when I posted a reference to this study. It's hard to accept defeat or to debate intelligently in light of solid evidence that refutes one's personal beliefs. When that happens, one can engage in avoidance, changing the subject, or verbal abuse. In my over ten years of involvement on this ng, and in working with families, children, and students, I'm familiar with all three strategies. None of the strategies change the evidence research has demonstrated. Hitting children is no more effective than alternative strategies that model, teach, and hold children accountable, and it carries the potential for both short and long term harm. We now have evidence that context and culture does not eliminate the potential for negative outcomes or decrease the effectiveness of alternative discipline strategies. LaVonne 0:- wrote: 0:- wrote: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...1114110820.htm Source: Society for Research in Child Development ... * More frequent use of physical discipline was less strongly associated with child aggression and anxiety when it was perceived as being more culturally accepted, but physical discipline was also associated with more aggression and anxiety regardless of the perception of cultural acceptance. ... ... * In all countries, however, higher use of physical discipline was associated with more child aggression and anxiety. ... The silence is deafening. Will I simply get another babbling change of subject from Doan? Or will he continue to display his cowardice and shame his good family name? R R R R ....hihihi http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...1114110820.htm |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Spanking Leads To Child Aggression And Anxiety, Regardless OfCultural Norm
On 10 Jan 2007, 0:- wrote:
Carlson LaVonne wrote: Well, I received a multitude of similar responses when I posted a reference to this study. It's hard to accept defeat or to debate intelligently in light of solid evidence that refutes one's personal beliefs. When that happens, one can engage in avoidance, changing the subject, or verbal abuse. In my over ten years of involvement on this ng, and in working with families, children, and students, I'm familiar with all three strategies. None of the strategies change the evidence research has demonstrated. Hitting children is no more effective than alternative strategies that model, teach, and hold children accountable, and it carries the potential for both short and long term harm. We now have evidence that context and culture does not eliminate the potential for negative outcomes or decrease the effectiveness of alternative discipline strategies. I'm not going to hold my breath waiting for any comprehensive debate from the pro spank faction. Though doubtless they wish I would. 0:-] Kane In other words, you will resort to lies and verbal abuses! Is it you that said that your mom approved your calling other women a "smelly-****"? AF |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Spanking Leads To Child Aggression And Anxiety, Regardless OfCultural Norm
Doan wrote: First, the study is a correlation study. Yes? No CAUSATION can be implied. Do you have a "causation" study to share with us that supports spanking? Please show it. No causation was implied by LaVonne. Read what she actually said, before you start your usual stream of weaseling dodges and outright lies, stupid. Thus, the claim that spanking "Leads" to child aggression and anxiety is bogus! Really? We make judgments about what is and isn't true based only on "causation" research outcomes? When you have enough correlation you can make determinate assumptions that are considered quite valid in social, and for that matter, other sciences. You are abusing science by your comments. Correlation is a valid scientific concept. It is and has been used successfully to make major policy and decisions to action on things as varied as rocket launches, and what to serve for breakfast. You are full of bull****, Doan. Second, the authors themselves admitted that they included beatings that are certainly abusive in the USA in study. The same kind of "beatings" that have been defended in this very newsgroup as acceptable corporal punishment. They also said that regardless of where they got the data from, including were children are NOT beaten, it resulted in negative outcomes. Why do you start off right out of the chute lying, Doan? If you really want to debate this study, I am willing to give it a shot - no verbal abuse warranted. ;-) Bull****. You will be into ad hom the first time you are stumped. Wanna give me a try? No. You are a liar, and as a debater, rank right up there with Goebbels, as a thug and attack monkey. I'd like to debate someone that debates. My guess is you will be the one that do the avoidance and instead will use your little Kane9 to do the verbal abuse and attack for you. Trying your best to keep me out of the argument, I see. Trying to negate LaVonne's argument by pretending that my joining in would contaminate her debate. I see. You are a liar and fool, you stupid little git. SEE STUPID DOAN THE HYSTERICAL MONKEYBOY. YOU, Doan, started OFF with verbal abuse and attack on the poster. Go **** up a rope stupid. You are unethical, immoral, a liar, and an insult to the Doan family name. YOU just proved it AGAIN. Get some of them here to witness what you are up to and you'd be ostracized by your own kin. I have far too much respect for them to let you get away with this, you little ****ant. LIAR. Have a happy new year, Coward, Liar, dishonorable little steaming dog-**** pile Start with an insult, you are going to get them back. Trust me. Would you like to go back and try another start? A polite one, devoid of ad hom or sly attack on the poster, and begin with facts and logic instead of the usual lies you promulgate? Kane Doan On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, Carlson LaVonne wrote: Well, I received a multitude of similar responses when I posted a reference to this study. It's hard to accept defeat or to debate intelligently in light of solid evidence that refutes one's personal beliefs. When that happens, one can engage in avoidance, changing the subject, or verbal abuse. In my over ten years of involvement on this ng, and in working with families, children, and students, I'm familiar with all three strategies. None of the strategies change the evidence research has demonstrated. Hitting children is no more effective than alternative strategies that model, teach, and hold children accountable, and it carries the potential for both short and long term harm. We now have evidence that context and culture does not eliminate the potential for negative outcomes or decrease the effectiveness of alternative discipline strategies. LaVonne 0:- wrote: 0:- wrote: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...1114110820.htm Source: Society for Research in Child Development ... * More frequent use of physical discipline was less strongly associated with child aggression and anxiety when it was perceived as being more culturally accepted, but physical discipline was also associated with more aggression and anxiety regardless of the perception of cultural acceptance. ... ... * In all countries, however, higher use of physical discipline was associated with more child aggression and anxiety. ... The silence is deafening. Will I simply get another babbling change of subject from Doan? Or will he continue to display his cowardice and shame his good family name? R R R R ....hihihi http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...1114110820.htm |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Spanking Leads To Child Aggression And Anxiety, Regardless OfCultural Norm
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, 0:- wrote:
Doan wrote: First, the study is a correlation study. Yes? No CAUSATION can be implied. Do you have a "causation" study to share with us that supports spanking? Please show it. No causation was implied by LaVonne. Read what she actually said, before you start your usual stream of weaseling dodges and outright lies, stupid. Thus, the claim that spanking "Leads" to child aggression and anxiety is bogus! Really? We make judgments about what is and isn't true based only on "causation" research outcomes? When you have enough correlation you can make determinate assumptions that are considered quite valid in social, and for that matter, other sciences. You are abusing science by your comments. And you are, once again, exposing your STUPIDITY by yours! Correlation is a valid scientific concept. It is and has been used successfully to make major policy and decisions to action on things as varied as rocket launches, and what to serve for breakfast. Hahaha! Correlation is not causation is the first thing they teach in statistics 101! Are you this STUPID??? You are full of bull****, Doan. Oops! More **** coming out of more mouth again! ;-) Second, the authors themselves admitted that they included beatings that are certainly abusive in the USA in study. The same kind of "beatings" that have been defended in this very newsgroup as acceptable corporal punishment. They also said that regardless of where they got the data from, including were children are NOT beaten, it resulted in negative outcomes. Hahaha! Which children were not beaten, Kane. Why do you start off right out of the chute lying, Doan? Why do you always a STUPID liar, Kane? If you really want to debate this study, I am willing to give it a shot - no verbal abuse warranted. ;-) Bull****. You will be into ad hom the first time you are stumped. What a hypocrite! Wanna give me a try? No. You are a liar, and as a debater, rank right up there with Goebbels, as a thug and attack monkey. I'd like to debate someone that debates. My guess is you will be the one that do the avoidance and instead will use your little Kane9 to do the verbal abuse and attack for you. Trying your best to keep me out of the argument, I see. Trying to negate LaVonne's argument by pretending that my joining in would contaminate her debate. I see. You are a liar and fool, you stupid little git. SEE STUPID DOAN THE HYSTERICAL MONKEYBOY. See STUPID KANE doing the dirty works for his master, LaVonne. YOU, Doan, started OFF with verbal abuse and attack on the poster. Another STUPID LIE, Kane. Go **** up a rope stupid. You are unethical, immoral, a liar, and an insult to the Doan family name. YOU just proved it AGAIN. Hihihi! I have proven that you are a STUPID liar! Get some of them here to witness what you are up to and you'd be ostracized by your own kin. I have far too much respect for them to let you get away with this, you little ****ant. Hahaha! And your mom should be proud of you; especially when called others "smelly-****"! LIAR. That would be YOU, Kane! Have a happy new year, Coward, Liar, dishonorable little steaming dog-**** pile You are Kane9 so the "dog-****" must come from your mouth! ;-) Start with an insult, you are going to get them back. Trust me. Hihihi! Your mom taught you well! Would you like to go back and try another start? A polite one, devoid of ad hom or sly attack on the poster, and begin with facts and logic instead of the usual lies you promulgate? Hahaha! Would you stop being an attack dog for LaVonne? Kane AF Doan On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, Carlson LaVonne wrote: Well, I received a multitude of similar responses when I posted a reference to this study. It's hard to accept defeat or to debate intelligently in light of solid evidence that refutes one's personal beliefs. When that happens, one can engage in avoidance, changing the subject, or verbal abuse. In my over ten years of involvement on this ng, and in working with families, children, and students, I'm familiar with all three strategies. None of the strategies change the evidence research has demonstrated. Hitting children is no more effective than alternative strategies that model, teach, and hold children accountable, and it carries the potential for both short and long term harm. We now have evidence that context and culture does not eliminate the potential for negative outcomes or decrease the effectiveness of alternative discipline strategies. LaVonne 0:- wrote: 0:- wrote: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...1114110820.htm Source: Society for Research in Child Development ... * More frequent use of physical discipline was less strongly associated with child aggression and anxiety when it was perceived as being more culturally accepted, but physical discipline was also associated with more aggression and anxiety regardless of the perception of cultural acceptance. ... ... * In all countries, however, higher use of physical discipline was associated with more child aggression and anxiety. ... The silence is deafening. Will I simply get another babbling change of subject from Doan? Or will he continue to display his cowardice and shame his good family name? R R R R ....hihihi http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...1114110820.htm |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Spanking Leads To Child Aggression And Anxiety, Regardless OfCultural Norm
Doan wrote:
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, 0:- wrote: Doan wrote: Hysterical yammering screeching monkeyboy nonsense. Go away, stupid. First, the study is a correlation study. Yes? No CAUSATION can be implied. Do you have a "causation" study to share with us that supports spanking? Please show it. No causation was implied by LaVonne. Read what she actually said, before you start your usual stream of weaseling dodges and outright lies, stupid. Thus, the claim that spanking "Leads" to child aggression and anxiety is bogus! Really? We make judgments about what is and isn't true based only on "causation" research outcomes? When you have enough correlation you can make determinate assumptions that are considered quite valid in social, and for that matter, other sciences. You are abusing science by your comments. And you are, once again, exposing your STUPIDITY by yours! Correlation is a valid scientific concept. It is and has been used successfully to make major policy and decisions to action on things as varied as rocket launches, and what to serve for breakfast. Hahaha! Correlation is not causation is the first thing they teach in statistics 101! Are you this STUPID??? You are full of bull****, Doan. Oops! More **** coming out of more mouth again! ;-) Second, the authors themselves admitted that they included beatings that are certainly abusive in the USA in study. The same kind of "beatings" that have been defended in this very newsgroup as acceptable corporal punishment. They also said that regardless of where they got the data from, including were children are NOT beaten, it resulted in negative outcomes. Hahaha! Which children were not beaten, Kane. Why do you start off right out of the chute lying, Doan? Why do you always a STUPID liar, Kane? If you really want to debate this study, I am willing to give it a shot - no verbal abuse warranted. ;-) Bull****. You will be into ad hom the first time you are stumped. What a hypocrite! Wanna give me a try? No. You are a liar, and as a debater, rank right up there with Goebbels, as a thug and attack monkey. I'd like to debate someone that debates. My guess is you will be the one that do the avoidance and instead will use your little Kane9 to do the verbal abuse and attack for you. Trying your best to keep me out of the argument, I see. Trying to negate LaVonne's argument by pretending that my joining in would contaminate her debate. I see. You are a liar and fool, you stupid little git. SEE STUPID DOAN THE HYSTERICAL MONKEYBOY. See STUPID KANE doing the dirty works for his master, LaVonne. YOU, Doan, started OFF with verbal abuse and attack on the poster. Another STUPID LIE, Kane. Go **** up a rope stupid. You are unethical, immoral, a liar, and an insult to the Doan family name. YOU just proved it AGAIN. Hihihi! I have proven that you are a STUPID liar! Get some of them here to witness what you are up to and you'd be ostracized by your own kin. I have far too much respect for them to let you get away with this, you little ****ant. Hahaha! And your mom should be proud of you; especially when called others "smelly-****"! LIAR. That would be YOU, Kane! Have a happy new year, Coward, Liar, dishonorable little steaming dog-**** pile You are Kane9 so the "dog-****" must come from your mouth! ;-) Start with an insult, you are going to get them back. Trust me. Hihihi! Your mom taught you well! Would you like to go back and try another start? A polite one, devoid of ad hom or sly attack on the poster, and begin with facts and logic instead of the usual lies you promulgate? Hahaha! Would you stop being an attack dog for LaVonne? Kane AF Doan On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, Carlson LaVonne wrote: Well, I received a multitude of similar responses when I posted a reference to this study. It's hard to accept defeat or to debate intelligently in light of solid evidence that refutes one's personal beliefs. When that happens, one can engage in avoidance, changing the subject, or verbal abuse. In my over ten years of involvement on this ng, and in working with families, children, and students, I'm familiar with all three strategies. None of the strategies change the evidence research has demonstrated. Hitting children is no more effective than alternative strategies that model, teach, and hold children accountable, and it carries the potential for both short and long term harm. We now have evidence that context and culture does not eliminate the potential for negative outcomes or decrease the effectiveness of alternative discipline strategies. LaVonne 0:- wrote: 0:- wrote: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...1114110820.htm Source: Society for Research in Child Development ... * More frequent use of physical discipline was less strongly associated with child aggression and anxiety when it was perceived as being more culturally accepted, but physical discipline was also associated with more aggression and anxiety regardless of the perception of cultural acceptance. ... ... * In all countries, however, higher use of physical discipline was associated with more child aggression and anxiety. ... The silence is deafening. Will I simply get another babbling change of subject from Doan? Or will he continue to display his cowardice and shame his good family name? R R R R ....hihihi http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...1114110820.htm |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Spanking Leads To Child Aggression And Anxiety, Regardless OfCultural Norm
Doan wrote: On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, 0:- wrote: Doan wrote: Hysterical yammering screeching monkeyboy nonsense. Go away, stupid. Hihihi! And I thought you wanna debate. Where is LaVonne? AF First, the study is a correlation study. Yes? No CAUSATION can be implied. Do you have a "causation" study to share with us that supports spanking? Please show it. No causation was implied by LaVonne. Read what she actually said, before you start your usual stream of weaseling dodges and outright lies, stupid. Thus, the claim that spanking "Leads" to child aggression and anxiety is bogus! Really? We make judgments about what is and isn't true based only on "causation" research outcomes? When you have enough correlation you can make determinate assumptions that are considered quite valid in social, and for that matter, other sciences. You are abusing science by your comments. And you are, once again, exposing your STUPIDITY by yours! Correlation is a valid scientific concept. It is and has been used successfully to make major policy and decisions to action on things as varied as rocket launches, and what to serve for breakfast. Hahaha! Correlation is not causation is the first thing they teach in statistics 101! Are you this STUPID??? You are full of bull****, Doan. Oops! More **** coming out of more mouth again! ;-) Second, the authors themselves admitted that they included beatings that are certainly abusive in the USA in study. The same kind of "beatings" that have been defended in this very newsgroup as acceptable corporal punishment. They also said that regardless of where they got the data from, including were children are NOT beaten, it resulted in negative outcomes. Hahaha! Which children were not beaten, Kane. Why do you start off right out of the chute lying, Doan? Why do you always a STUPID liar, Kane? If you really want to debate this study, I am willing to give it a shot - no verbal abuse warranted. ;-) Bull****. You will be into ad hom the first time you are stumped. What a hypocrite! Wanna give me a try? No. You are a liar, and as a debater, rank right up there with Goebbels, as a thug and attack monkey. I'd like to debate someone that debates. My guess is you will be the one that do the avoidance and instead will use your little Kane9 to do the verbal abuse and attack for you. Trying your best to keep me out of the argument, I see. Trying to negate LaVonne's argument by pretending that my joining in would contaminate her debate. I see. You are a liar and fool, you stupid little git. SEE STUPID DOAN THE HYSTERICAL MONKEYBOY. See STUPID KANE doing the dirty works for his master, LaVonne. YOU, Doan, started OFF with verbal abuse and attack on the poster. Another STUPID LIE, Kane. Go **** up a rope stupid. You are unethical, immoral, a liar, and an insult to the Doan family name. YOU just proved it AGAIN. Hihihi! I have proven that you are a STUPID liar! Get some of them here to witness what you are up to and you'd be ostracized by your own kin. I have far too much respect for them to let you get away with this, you little ****ant. Hahaha! And your mom should be proud of you; especially when called others "smelly-****"! LIAR. That would be YOU, Kane! Have a happy new year, Coward, Liar, dishonorable little steaming dog-**** pile You are Kane9 so the "dog-****" must come from your mouth! ;-) Start with an insult, you are going to get them back. Trust me. Hihihi! Your mom taught you well! Would you like to go back and try another start? A polite one, devoid of ad hom or sly attack on the poster, and begin with facts and logic instead of the usual lies you promulgate? Hahaha! Would you stop being an attack dog for LaVonne? Kane AF Doan On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, Carlson LaVonne wrote: Well, I received a multitude of similar responses when I posted a reference to this study. It's hard to accept defeat or to debate intelligently in light of solid evidence that refutes one's personal beliefs. When that happens, one can engage in avoidance, changing the subject, or verbal abuse. In my over ten years of involvement on this ng, and in working with families, children, and students, I'm familiar with all three strategies. None of the strategies change the evidence research has demonstrated. Hitting children is no more effective than alternative strategies that model, teach, and hold children accountable, and it carries the potential for both short and long term harm. We now have evidence that context and culture does not eliminate the potential for negative outcomes or decrease the effectiveness of alternative discipline strategies. LaVonne 0:- wrote: 0:- wrote: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...1114110820.htm Source: Society for Research in Child Development ... * More frequent use of physical discipline was less strongly associated with child aggression and anxiety when it was perceived as being more culturally accepted, but physical discipline was also associated with more aggression and anxiety regardless of the perception of cultural acceptance. ... ... * In all countries, however, higher use of physical discipline was associated with more child aggression and anxiety. ... The silence is deafening. Will I simply get another babbling change of subject from Doan? Or will he continue to display his cowardice and shame his good family name? R R R R ....hihihi http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...1114110820.htm |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| | Kids should work... | Kane | General | 13 | December 10th 03 02:30 AM |
| | Kids should work... | Kane | Spanking | 12 | December 10th 03 02:30 AM |
| | Kids should work... | Kane | Foster Parents | 3 | December 8th 03 11:53 PM |
Kids should work. | LaVonne Carlson | General | 22 | December 7th 03 04:27 AM |
Kids should work. | ChrisScaife | Spanking | 16 | December 7th 03 04:27 AM |