Who has the ultimate right to choose?

"CafeWriter" wrote in message
news:gLFQh.23591$DE1.9013@pd7urf2no...

"Chris" wrote in message
...

"CafeWriter" wrote in message
news:ixEPh.7897$6m4.5248@pd7urf1no...

"Chris" wrote in message
...
Does the right to choose whether or not to give birth rest SOLELY
with
the
woman?



Yes.

Then she alone should be held responsible for any outcome of her SOLE
choice, correct?






Actually reality works both ways. When a woman gets pregnant, then the
man
who is responsible for making her pregnant, should support her in any way
possible.

Really? So if it's possible for him to give her lobster dinners daily, buy
her a brand new car, and build her a luxury home, he should do it?


However, there have been a history of women who do not want or cannot
afford
children. The man who have made her pregnant must respect her choice onw
hatever or not to have an abortion. After all, it is HER body, not HIS
body. If it was HIS body, then it's up to him. Sadly, it doesn't work
that
way.

If the woman continues to carry the fetus to full term, then the child's
father must be responsible for taking care of the child just as the
child's
mother. It does not work one way. It always work both ways.

Argument ad baculum.


If the father is not willing to stay with the mother while she is trying
to
raise the child, then the father should pay child support. After all, it
was his sperm that helped form the child.

Uhuh. It was also the grandmother's egg that helped form the child.


Does any of that make sense? No? Too bad. Maybe you should take sex
education classes again because women cannot get pregnant just by
themselves.

That's correct. But we aren't talking about getting pregnant; we are talking
about the SOLE choice to give birth.


(Use common sense, doncha?)