If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#881
|
|||
|
|||
child support review objection
"Chris" wrote in message ... -- [Any man that's good enough to support a child is good enough to have custody of such child] "Sarah Gray" wrote in message . 17.102... "Chris" wrote in news:WZH9j.24065$Qf1.4937 @newsfe07.phx: "Sarah Gray" wrote in message . 17.102... "Chris" wrote in news:B0A9j.24038$Qf1.21467 @newsfe07.phx: "Sarah Gray" wrote in message . 33.102... "Chris" wrote in : "Sarah Gray" wrote in message . 17.102... "Chris" wrote in : He has the right to, but doesn't our daughter deserve to see both of her parents regularly? No. That's why you don't allow it. I allow it. He can see his daughter whenever he wants to. In case you were not aware, seeing someone requires both a time AND a place. It also requires not being 10 hours away. Nah, REALLY? I thought I had that covered by a "place". Ok, so he doesn't have a place to see her that is not 10 hours away. But he HAS a place, doesn't he. Not close enough to her. Thanks to YOU. How is it my fault he moved? Since that's not my claim, you tell me. Can you prove it's not your claim? |
#882
|
|||
|
|||
child support review objection
-- [Any man that's good enough to support a child is good enough to have custody of such child] "Sarah Gray" wrote in message .102... "Chris" wrote in : "Chris" wrote in : He cannot be an active parent from 10 hours away. Neither could I .If he wants to reduce himself to being a visitor in her life, and not a parent, there is not much I can do about it. That's correct; but you can do EVERYTHING about YOUR choice to reduce him to such status. It was not my choice. Untrue. In what way was it my choice for him to move? I wasn't aware that it was. I want him to be an active parent. No you don't. Uh yes, I do. Prove it. I should not have to give up my own rights as a parent in order to facilitate his parenting time. But he should. When did I say that? That's right, he shouldn't because he CAN'T! Cannot give up that which you don't have. The fact that we both have rights to her ...... is nonsense. means neither one of us supersedes the other. |
#883
|
|||
|
|||
child support review objection
-- [Any man that's good enough to support a child is good enough to have custody of such child] "teachrmama" wrote in message ... "Animal02" wrote in message news:_bOdnSvRiLd3sfranZ2dnUVZ_uidnZ2d@wideopenwest .com... "teachrmama" wrote in message ... "Animal02" wrote in message ... "teachrmama" wrote in message ... "Chris" wrote in message ... -- [Any man that's good enough to support a child is good enough to have custody of such child] "teachrmama" wrote in message ... "Chris" wrote in message ... -- [Any man that's good enough to support a child is good enough to have custody of such child] "teachrmama" wrote in message ... "Chris" wrote in message ... -- [Any man that's good enough to support a child is good enough to have custody of such child] "Sarah Gray" wrote in message . 17.102... "Chris" wrote in : It's a simple "YES'" or "NO" question. Please answer it that way. It's a loaded question, so I was qualifiying my "yes". It's not loaded at all. A loaded question forces the respondent to admit by implication to something regardless of how they answer. NOT the case here. Either handing the money to the parent supports a child or it does not. Which is it? The act of handing money to the child's custodial parent does not automatically support the child. BINGO! See how simple the answer is? A responsible and honest custodial parent will use those funds to help support their child. It's not a simple yes or no question. I'm all for a system requiring accountability. Translation: "I'm all for a system requiring a man to give FREE cash to a woman". No, I'm all for a system that treats parents and children as fair as possible. I think parents have financial obligations to their children, but for basic needs, not anything more. Hence your error. Money does NOT equal basic needs. Ever see a child eat a dollar bill? So how are goods and serviced procured for a child without m oney changing hands somewhere? Perhaps you should ask the first people to walk the Earth. I'm sorry, how DUMB of me! Everyone knows that money existed before people did. Otherwise, there would be no goods or services for their children. Guess I really blew THAT one....... What do you permit your renters to give to you in lieu of money when they have no money, Chris? Nuts and berries? Who said that I permit them to give me ANYTHING? WIth all due respect, my contract with tenants simply aint' your business. Well, Chris, you did state in antoher post that you walked into living space of one of your renters and saw all sorts of Christmas presents, but they hadn't paid rent, so you evicted them. Were they attempting to take your advice and live without money? But you evicted them anyway? My only advice to them was "pay or quit". And then, ONLY because it is mandated by law. Child support is mandated by law, Chris. And yet I have never paid a dime in child support which will be 17 years next month. :-) Is there a court order for you to do so? Or do you have it worked out another way? I received 50/50 custody when my daughter was less than2 years old, over the objections of her mother who didn't want me to have ANY overnights, And it has worked out well? Did mom come to accept the arrangement? And has it worked out well for your daughter as well? I am all for 50/50 custody as the default option whenever it is possible. No you're not; unless, of course, "possible" is unilaterally defined by the mother or her designated advocate. |
#884
|
|||
|
|||
child support review objection
"Chris" wrote in message ... -- [Any man that's good enough to support a child is good enough to have custody of such child] "teachrmama" wrote in message ... "Chris" wrote in message news -- [Any man that's good enough to support a child is good enough to have custody of such child] "Sarah Gray" wrote in message . 17.102... "Chris" wrote in : We're talking about contributing to the child in the family, not trading with some retailer. How do you contribute materially to a child without acquiring said good and services? Why don't you ask the first people who walked the Earth. Because they are not longer with us. You actually took me literally! LOL No, Chris, I simply responded to your idiotic statement. In our modern society money is a necessity. If it were not, you would not be so h*ll-bent on collecting every penny of rent due to you, and evicting those with the audacity to not pay. |
#885
|
|||
|
|||
child support review objection
"Chris" wrote in message ... -- [Any man that's good enough to support a child is good enough to have custody of such child] "teachrmama" wrote in message ... "Chris" wrote in message ... -- [Any man that's good enough to support a child is good enough to have custody of such child] "Sarah Gray" wrote in message . 33.102... "Chris" wrote in : You didn't answer the rest of my question. Are you talking about financial contributions? I suppose if one could gain nourishment from chewing on a dollar bill, then the answer would be "yes". Sewing enough of them together could probably provide clothing too. For that matter, with an ample supply you might even be able to provide warmth by burning them. If there was some way he could provide his share of her expenses by procuring those goods and services for her directly, I would be all for that. Untrue. The thing is, he's not here, parenting her, to be able to. Nor is she there where he is able to parent her. And whose choice, again, is it that she is not there? His, of course. He moved. Based on the premise that it is impossible for children to move. Prove it, Chris. |
#886
|
|||
|
|||
child support review objection
"Chris" wrote in message ... -- [Any man that's good enough to support a child is good enough to have custody of such child] "Sarah Gray" wrote in message . 17.102... "Chris" wrote in : "Sarah Gray" wrote in message . 33.102... "Chris" wrote in news "Chris" wrote in news I was unaware that it is illegal for a parent to move beyond a certain distance away from their child. Just curious: is it by way of road or by way of crow? Driving miles. How many miles is it, and what is the prison sentence for living beyond that distance? Got any cites? I've cited it at least twice already: http://courts.michigan.gov/SCAO/reso...anuals/focb/cp _c hange.pdf Dead site. Not so. Works just fine for me. Tried it once again, and here is what comes up: The page cannot be found The page you are looking for might have been removed, had its name changed, or is temporarily unavailable. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- Please try the following: Make sure that the Web site address displayed in the address bar of your browser is spelled and formatted correctly. If you reached this page by clicking a link, contact the Web site administrator to alert them that the link is incorrectly formatted. Click the Back button to try another link. HTTP Error 404 - File or directory not found. Internet Information Services (IIS) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- Technical Information (for support personnel) Go to Microsoft Product Support Services and perform a title search for the words HTTP and 404. Open IIS Help, which is accessible in IIS Manager (inetmgr), and search for topics titled Web Site Setup, Common Administrative Tasks, and About Custom Error Messages. Why do you act as if I am in the wrong for saying that I would call the police if he kidnapped her? The above question is a textbook example of clouded thinking. How exactly does one "act" is if someone is wrong? You seem to have the presumption that anything I do to try and protect my child and my own parental rights is the wrong thing to do. Now it's "my" child again. LOL What seems to be and what actually is are often different. Why do you keep remarking on how I address my daughter? She has two parents... Yeah, but it meanders depending on whether you are talking about rights or talking about responsibilities. Same kind of tactic used in government "child support" propaganda. No surprise here. She has two parents regardless whether we are talking about rights or responsibilities. Both of her parents have both! No they don't. Why is it that you keep making false claims yet NEVER support them? Do you REALLY expect me to believe unsubstantiated claims? Why not? You expect us to believe yours!! |
#887
|
|||
|
|||
child support review objection
"Chris" wrote in message ... -- [Any man that's good enough to support a child is good enough to have custody of such child] "Sarah Gray" wrote in message . 17.102... "Chris" wrote in : He didn't, what is your point. He never stated that he was leaving townb to get away from me specifically. I see. He assumed that you were just going to hop in the car and ride along. Then when you didn't, he was totally shocked, but decided to not share that with you. Got it. He didn't ask anyone else to go with him, either.. was he moving away from them, specifically, too? The difference being that you were MARRIED. Forget that part? No, actually, they were divorced and had been for quite some time. |
#888
|
|||
|
|||
child support review objection
"teachrmama" wrote in message ... "Animal02" wrote in message ... "teachrmama" wrote in message ... "Animal02" wrote in message news:_bOdnSvRiLd3sfranZ2dnUVZ_uidnZ2d@wideopenwest .com... "teachrmama" wrote in message ... "Animal02" wrote in message ... "teachrmama" wrote in message ... "Chris" wrote in message ... -- [Any man that's good enough to support a child is good enough to have custody of such child] "teachrmama" wrote in message ... "Chris" wrote in message ... -- [Any man that's good enough to support a child is good enough to have custody of such child] "teachrmama" wrote in message ... "Chris" wrote in message ... -- [Any man that's good enough to support a child is good enough to have custody of such child] "Sarah Gray" wrote in message . 17.102... "Chris" wrote in : It's a simple "YES'" or "NO" question. Please answer it that way. It's a loaded question, so I was qualifiying my "yes". It's not loaded at all. A loaded question forces the respondent to admit by implication to something regardless of how they answer. NOT the case here. Either handing the money to the parent supports a child or it does not. Which is it? The act of handing money to the child's custodial parent does not automatically support the child. BINGO! See how simple the answer is? A responsible and honest custodial parent will use those funds to help support their child. It's not a simple yes or no question. I'm all for a system requiring accountability. Translation: "I'm all for a system requiring a man to give FREE cash to a woman". No, I'm all for a system that treats parents and children as fair as possible. I think parents have financial obligations to their children, but for basic needs, not anything more. Hence your error. Money does NOT equal basic needs. Ever see a child eat a dollar bill? So how are goods and serviced procured for a child without m oney changing hands somewhere? Perhaps you should ask the first people to walk the Earth. I'm sorry, how DUMB of me! Everyone knows that money existed before people did. Otherwise, there would be no goods or services for their children. Guess I really blew THAT one....... What do you permit your renters to give to you in lieu of money when they have no money, Chris? Nuts and berries? Who said that I permit them to give me ANYTHING? WIth all due respect, my contract with tenants simply aint' your business. Well, Chris, you did state in antoher post that you walked into living space of one of your renters and saw all sorts of Christmas presents, but they hadn't paid rent, so you evicted them. Were they attempting to take your advice and live without money? But you evicted them anyway? My only advice to them was "pay or quit". And then, ONLY because it is mandated by law. Child support is mandated by law, Chris. And yet I have never paid a dime in child support which will be 17 years next month. :-) Is there a court order for you to do so? Or do you have it worked out another way? I received 50/50 custody when my daughter was less than2 years old, over the objections of her mother who didn't want me to have ANY overnights, And it has worked out well? Did mom come to accept the arrangement? And has it worked out well for your daughter as well? I am all for 50/50 custody as the default option whenever it is possible. Yes, it has worked out fine... to took a bit of time for her mom to get "beaten" into submission........I think it was the judge threatening her with jail time if she disregarded another of his orders. My daughter will graduate this spring from one of the all girls schools in the metro area (carrying a 4.0 right now) and has already been accepted to Grand Valley which is where she really wants to go. Her mom and I did the parent teacher conferences together throughout, and even co sponsored a few parties for her......Last New Year's eve, she had a party at my house, I became quite ill, so her mother ended up supervising the party at my house while I stayed in bed. At this point, she sort of decides where she stays....she has her own car and goes back and forth.......(typically if she wants to entertain friends, it is at my house) I'm so glad it worked out well for all of you. I have seen quite a number of 50/50 custody situations work out equally well. Even one where the parents can't stand each other, but they each have her half the time. That was the way we were for the first 5-7 years. |
#889
|
|||
|
|||
child support review objection
"teachrmama" wrote "Animal02" wrote "teachrmama" wrote ... "Animal02" wrote .................................................. ............ I received 50/50 custody when my daughter was less than2 years old, over the objections of her mother who didn't want me to have ANY overnights, And it has worked out well? Did mom come to accept the arrangement? And has it worked out well for your daughter as well? I am all for 50/50 custody as the default option whenever it is possible. Yes, it has worked out fine... to took a bit of time for her mom to get "beaten" into submission........I think it was the judge threatening her with jail time if she disregarded another of his orders. My daughter will graduate this spring from one of the all girls schools in the metro area (carrying a 4.0 right now) and has already been accepted to Grand Valley which is where she really wants to go. Her mom and I did the parent teacher conferences together throughout, and even co sponsored a few parties for her......Last New Year's eve, she had a party at my house, I became quite ill, so her mother ended up supervising the party at my house while I stayed in bed. At this point, she sort of decides where she stays....she has her own car and goes back and forth.......(typically if she wants to entertain friends, it is at my house) I'm so glad it worked out well for all of you. I have seen quite a number of 50/50 custody situations work out equally well. Even one where the parents can't stand each other, but they each have her half the time. ==== And the key is for the parents to realize that the matter has zero to do with them, and 100% has to do with the child(ren). That's it--period. |
#890
|
|||
|
|||
child support review objection
"Sarah Gray" wrote "Gini" wrote "Sarah Gray" wrote "Gini" wrote ............................................ === Well, it's actually money given to the CP to use as she pleases as long as the kid isn't starving. Nope. Not all custodial parents are women. Most, maybe, but not all. Therefore Chris's statement is wrong, and so is yours. ===== What is it about my statement that is wrong? Your use of "she". === Well, that might be wrong if I used "she" 100% of the time instead of 90% of the time. Using "she" one time is not wrong. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sacramento County, CA -- Review shows more child-neglect deaths:12-year-old girl wasted away to 23 pounds, even after six separate reportsto Child Protective Services about the child | fx | Spanking | 0 | September 14th 07 04:50 AM |
PHOENIX Arizona Objection to releasing slain kids' files ends... | fx | Spanking | 0 | July 25th 07 04:46 AM |
PHOENIX Arizona Objection to releasing slain kids' files ends... | fx | Foster Parents | 0 | July 25th 07 04:46 AM |
Sign our Child Support patition for child support reform | [email protected] | Child Support | 0 | February 24th 07 10:01 AM |
P. Diddy: Child support lawsuit really about 'adult support' | Dusty | Child Support | 0 | September 13th 04 12:35 AM |