If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Is it just me or is this complete lunacy?
Deployed troops fight for lost custody of kids
Children taken from single parents in uniform when they are mobilized http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18506417/ Funny that the first case they mention is a woman, but the rest of the article is filled with *fathers* having their kids stolen with legal assistance. But child support and all the associated family law isn't out of control, noooooo |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Is it just me or is this complete lunacy?
On May 5, 11:04 pm, Bill wrote:
Deployed troops fight for lost custody of kids Children taken from single parents in uniform when they are mobilizedhttp://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18506417/ Funny that the first case they mention is a woman, but the rest of the article is filled with *fathers* having their kids stolen with legal assistance. But child support and all the associated family law isn't out of control, noooooo well, at least you arent one of those children... Iam and it ruined my life! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Is it just me or is this complete lunacy?
Bill wrote:
Deployed troops fight for lost custody of kids Children taken from single parents in uniform when they are mobilized http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18506417/ Funny that the first case they mention is a woman, but the rest of the article is filled with *fathers* having their kids stolen with legal assistance. But child support and all the associated family law isn't out of control, noooooo In both the case of the woman AND the man in that article, that's pretty low. And I love the justification: apparently, either these idiots haven't read McColloch vs. Maryland lately, or they don't think of custody changes as a "civil action". I think anybody who has read the law realizes that Congress wanted its soldiers to be able to fight without having worries at home on their mind. And losing your child would damn well be more important than a piece of property, making that law apply more rather than less. How could you fight (no matter what you believe about the current situation), knowing that your rights are being eroded without you having so much as a say so in the matter? If I'm a general and I'm worried about troop levels, I'd be at least sending a message up the federal levels telling them that the last thing they need is troops having to decide between their country and their children. I'd |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
a complete free forum just for you | [email protected] | General | 0 | April 14th 07 02:37 AM |
Complete Placenta Previa | [email protected] | Pregnancy | 13 | April 3rd 06 08:19 AM |
The almost-complete birth experience... :) -- LONG! | emilymr | Pregnancy | 23 | November 24th 04 02:52 AM |
This post is a complete troll | Werebat | Child Support | 3 | May 1st 04 02:32 AM |