If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
Sampling the poster's lies by rejection and concealing of context
On Thu, 18 Jan 2007, 0:- wrote:
Doan wrote: On Thu, 18 Jan 2007, 0:- wrote: Doan wrote: So much for the claim that I am on Kane's "do-not-reply" list and he doesn't read my posts! How STUPID can this Kane be? Can't handle the challenge of the actual issue, I see, as usual, you cock sucking little asshole ****er and mother's **** sucker. Doan R E EE E RR R RR R.... What a ****ing nutcase you are Doan. The public sector won't have you so you have to hide out in academia for years so your family won't be embarassed at at how dishonest and sick you've turned out. R R R R R R R With post like this, no wonder Ron has so much RESPECT for you! ;-) Your problem is that you think that everything is a lie, but what YOU post. That's your sickness, little boy. So if someone, like you Kane, claimed that he does not read my posts, has me on his "do-not-reply" list, and yet, still replied to my posts, what would you call such a person, Kane? I think a STUPID LIAR is very appropriate! Don't you think so, Kane? ;-) Doan |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Sampling the poster's lies by rejection and concealing of context
Doan wrote:
On Thu, 18 Jan 2007, 0:- wrote: Doan wrote: On Thu, 18 Jan 2007, 0:- wrote: Doan wrote: So much for the claim that I am on Kane's "do-not-reply" list and he doesn't read my posts! How STUPID can this Kane be? Can't handle the challenge of the actual issue, I see, as usual, you cock sucking little asshole ****er and mother's **** sucker. Doan R E EE E RR R RR R.... What a ****ing nutcase you are Doan. The public sector won't have you so you have to hide out in academia for years so your family won't be embarassed at at how dishonest and sick you've turned out. R R R R R R R With post like this, no wonder Ron has so much RESPECT for you! ;-) Your problem is that you think that everything is a lie, but what YOU post. That's your sickness, little boy. So if someone, like you Kane, claimed that he does not read my posts, has me on his "do-not-reply" list, and yet, still replied to my posts, what would you call such a person, Kane? Some one so alarmed at how ****ing sick you are that he changed his mind, Doan. As simple as that. Silly assed debate between us is NOT the issue, nutcase. It's that you ****ing lie lie lie and call others liars, when the evidence of your lie is on the monitor right in front of your face and you deny it, or run, like this, from it. It's not about my reading or not reading your posts you ****ing insance **** spewer. It's that you'd continue to defend a blantant lie by omission with it staring you in the face that you lied. Straus didn't ONLY say that Baumrind's study was excellent. HE SAID "BUT" Doan, which means that 'excellent" it was NOT. You ahve done the same thing for years, getting wilder and more obvious as time passes with your shrinking away from the facts when presented back to your from your own posts, and from the sources you pull pieces from to LIE, to MISLEAD. This isn't about "spanking," you ****ing fool. It's about YOU throwing your life away by cultivating your delusional thinking until it's become out of your control. Go on, Doan. Tell us, right here and now, publicly that, "lack of spanking that has been shown, repeatedly, to be associates with higher misbehavior and agression in the Black community." In the face of your own source that said something very very different, with the qualifiers 'may be.' You don't SEE what that kind of delusional thinking means, Doan? They did NOT support you. Nor did you come back with PROOF when I asked you to support that claim. Man, your mind is ****ED. Do YOU, a little self absorbed babbling ****ant sitting for hours in a tech center at USC every day, dreaming up elaborate lies about corporal punishment research, really want to put yourself up against a giant like that ALVIN POUSSAINT, and make YOUR claim of the lack of spanking resulting in More aggression in black children when he says, "No one knew 30 years ago how traumatic spanking was to a child's psyche. You should avoid using physical force on your child?" When I say you are out of your ****ign mind, Doan I REALLY MEAN IT. Do you really want to put a lie in the mouth of Dr. Straus, someone you aren't fit to walk in the shadow of, let alone defy the research of, by claiming he fully believed that Baumrinds presentation represented ONLY excellent research, and as YOU claim, "the best study by far " when Straus actually said and more fully qualified the small part of his statement you quoted: Straus: " I said that her study is excellent, but despite that there are clear reasons for not accepting her conclusions:" Does THAT look to you like he's saying it's the best study by FAR? One that has clear reason it's conclusions cannot be accepted? Any reason I would NOT think you insane, Doan? You are out of your ****ing mind if you think he conclusively considered her study the best by far. These little hedging dodges you use to make claims PROVES you are either terminally immoral, or just out of your ****ing mind. I'd like to think it just mental illness, Doan. That often can be fixed. Those with moral dysfunctions are the most difficult and recalcirant to work with. Which is it, stupid? I think a STUPID LIAR is very appropriate! Don't you think so, Kane? ;-) The problem, Doan is that you are so lost in that kind of thinking I just exposed that your judgment is by default INCORRECT. A self delusion. WE aren't buying into YOUR delusions. Doan Seriously. Go talk to a shrink. You could tip over the edge at any time. I think you are too isolated and have no one to live, real, close up, to clue you in that you are losing it and have been for years. You'd be the last to know, if you don't wake up NOW and do something proactive to stop your delusional thinking. Best wishes. |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
Sampling the poster's lies by rejection and concealing of context
Doan wrote:
On Thu, 18 Jan 2007, 0:- wrote: Doan wrote: On Thu, 18 Jan 2007, 0:- wrote: Doan wrote: So much for the claim that I am on Kane's "do-not-reply" list and he doesn't read my posts! How STUPID can this Kane be? Can't handle the challenge of the actual issue, I see, as usual, you cock sucking little asshole ****er and mother's **** sucker. Doan R E EE E RR R RR R.... What a ****ing nutcase you are Doan. The public sector won't have you so you have to hide out in academia for years so your family won't be embarassed at at how dishonest and sick you've turned out. R R R R R R R With post like this, no wonder Ron has so much RESPECT for you! ;-) Your problem is that you think that everything is a lie, but what YOU post. That's your sickness, little boy. So if someone, like you Kane, claimed that he does not read my posts, has me on his "do-not-reply" list, and yet, still replied to my posts, what would you call such a person, Kane? I think a STUPID LIAR is very appropriate! Don't you think so, Kane? ;-) Doan Every response to me so far, Doan, has turned away from facing that your thinking was full of error. That neither Straus or the other reseachers actually said, in full context, what you claim they said and meant. Doan, that's dangerous thinking in the mental health context. It's akin to claiming that a car coming down the street is of no danger, when in fact there's ****ING BUS DOING 50 AND ONLY 20 FEET AWAY. JUMP, boy, jump. Straus didn't say that, and the researchers on the black community and spanking didn't say what you claimed. And many more fantastic delusional pontifications from on high that you have spewed are not more true that your babbling about these. Get HELP. |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
Sampling the poster's lies by rejection and concealing of context
On Thu, 18 Jan 2007, 0:- wrote:
Doan wrote: On Thu, 18 Jan 2007, 0:- wrote: Doan wrote: On Thu, 18 Jan 2007, 0:- wrote: Doan wrote: So much for the claim that I am on Kane's "do-not-reply" list and he doesn't read my posts! How STUPID can this Kane be? Can't handle the challenge of the actual issue, I see, as usual, you cock sucking little asshole ****er and mother's **** sucker. Doan R E EE E RR R RR R.... What a ****ing nutcase you are Doan. The public sector won't have you so you have to hide out in academia for years so your family won't be embarassed at at how dishonest and sick you've turned out. R R R R R R R With post like this, no wonder Ron has so much RESPECT for you! ;-) Your problem is that you think that everything is a lie, but what YOU post. That's your sickness, little boy. So if someone, like you Kane, claimed that he does not read my posts, has me on his "do-not-reply" list, and yet, still replied to my posts, what would you call such a person, Kane? Some one so alarmed at how ****ing sick you are that he changed his mind, Doan. Hahaha! No, Kane. You are a PROVEN LIAR! As simple as that. Silly assed debate between us is NOT the issue, nutcase. There is no debate between us, Kane. It just your exposing your STUPIDITY and me having fun at your expense! ;-) It's that you ****ing lie lie lie and call others liars, when the evidence of your lie is on the monitor right in front of your face and you deny it, or run, like this, from it. Calling other people liars without proof is your M.O. I don't call other people liar withou proof. I just PROVED that you are a LIAR, again! It's not about my reading or not reading your posts you ****ing insance **** spewer. Ooops! More "****" coming out of your mouth! ;-) It's that you'd continue to defend a blantant lie by omission with it staring you in the face that you lied. Straus didn't ONLY say that Baumrind's study was excellent. HE SAID "BUT" Doan, which means that 'excellent" it was NOT. Hahaha! You are such a STUPID LIAR! He said "BUT DESPIT THAT" which means it was "excellent", STUPID! Straus: " I said that her study is excellent, but despite that there are clear reasons for not accepting her conclusions:" You ahve done the same thing for years, getting wilder and more obvious as time passes with your shrinking away from the facts when presented back to your from your own posts, and from the sources you pull pieces from to LIE, to MISLEAD. Hihihi! I just PROVED again, the LIAR is you! This isn't about "spanking," you ****ing fool. It's about YOU throwing your life away by cultivating your delusional thinking until it's become out of your control. Hihihi! It's about me having fun at your expense, Kane. BECAUSE YOU ARE JUST TOO STUPID! Go on, Doan. Hihihi! Hahaha! Tell us, right here and now, publicly that, "lack of spanking that has been shown, repeatedly, to be associates with higher misbehavior and agression in the Black community." Yup! Read the studies, STUPID! Even email Chris Dunga and asked him! I DARE YOU! I DOUBLE DARE YOU! Hihihi! In the face of your own source that said something very very different, with the qualifiers 'may be.' Hihihi! ARE YOU THIS STUPID? You don't SEE what that kind of delusional thinking means, Doan? They did NOT support you. Nor did you come back with PROOF when I asked you to support that claim. Hihihi! YOU ARE THIS STUPID! Man, your mind is ****ED. Do YOU, a little self absorbed babbling ****ant sitting for hours in a tech center at USC every day, dreaming up elaborate lies about corporal punishment research, really want to put yourself up against a giant like that ALVIN POUSSAINT, and make YOUR claim of the lack of spanking resulting in More aggression in black children when he says, "No one knew 30 years ago how traumatic spanking was to a child's psyche. You should avoid using physical force on your child?" Hihihi! You know ALVIN POUSSANT? Or is this another one of your STUPID attempt of harassing me? When I say you are out of your ****ign mind, Doan I REALLY MEAN IT. Hihihi! When I say that YOU ARE STUPID, Kane I REALLY MEAN IT. First I thought Chris Dunga was only mad when he called you STUPID. You proved him right days after days! Do you really want to put a lie in the mouth of Dr. Straus, someone you aren't fit to walk in the shadow of, let alone defy the research of, by claiming he fully believed that Baumrinds presentation represented ONLY excellent research, and as YOU claim, "the best study by far " when Straus actually said and more fully qualified the small part of his statement you quoted: Straus: " I said that her study is excellent, but despite that there are clear reasons for not accepting her conclusions:" Which part of that sentence don't you understand, Kane? Does THAT look to you like he's saying it's the best study by FAR? Yes! Which part of "excellent" don't you understand? One that has clear reason it's conclusions cannot be accepted? Any reason I would NOT think you insane, Doan? Any reason I would NOT think you are STUPID, Kane? ;-) You are out of your ****ing mind if you think he conclusively considered her study the best by far. And you STUPID if you think it was not "excellent"! These little hedging dodges you use to make claims PROVES you are either terminally immoral, or just out of your ****ing mind. And it PROVED that you are just STUPID, Kane. Now you know why I laughed at you when you claimed you are a published researcher? I'd like to think it just mental illness, Doan. That often can be fixed. Those with moral dysfunctions are the most difficult and recalcirant to work with. Which is it, stupid? You have proven yourself to be STUPID! ;-) I think a STUPID LIAR is very appropriate! Don't you think so, Kane? ;-) The problem, Doan is that you are so lost in that kind of thinking I just exposed that your judgment is by default INCORRECT. A self delusion. WE aren't buying into YOUR delusions. Anyone here believes Kane? ;-) Doan Seriously. Go talk to a shrink. You could tip over the edge at any time. I think you are too isolated and have no one to live, real, close up, to clue you in that you are losing it and have been for years. Hihihi! You'd be the last to know, if you don't wake up NOW and do something proactive to stop your delusional thinking. I cannot fix your STUPIDITY! ;-) Best wishes. Same to you, Kane! ;-) |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
Sampling the poster's lies by rejection and concealing of context
On Thu, 18 Jan 2007, 0:- wrote:
Doan wrote: On Thu, 18 Jan 2007, 0:- wrote: Doan wrote: On Thu, 18 Jan 2007, 0:- wrote: Doan wrote: So much for the claim that I am on Kane's "do-not-reply" list and he doesn't read my posts! How STUPID can this Kane be? Can't handle the challenge of the actual issue, I see, as usual, you cock sucking little asshole ****er and mother's **** sucker. Doan R E EE E RR R RR R.... What a ****ing nutcase you are Doan. The public sector won't have you so you have to hide out in academia for years so your family won't be embarassed at at how dishonest and sick you've turned out. R R R R R R R With post like this, no wonder Ron has so much RESPECT for you! ;-) Your problem is that you think that everything is a lie, but what YOU post. That's your sickness, little boy. So if someone, like you Kane, claimed that he does not read my posts, has me on his "do-not-reply" list, and yet, still replied to my posts, what would you call such a person, Kane? I think a STUPID LIAR is very appropriate! Don't you think so, Kane? ;-) Doan Every response to me so far, Doan, has turned away from facing that your thinking was full of error. That neither Straus or the other reseachers actually said, in full context, what you claim they said and meant. Doan, that's dangerous thinking in the mental health context. It's akin to claiming that a car coming down the street is of no danger, when in fact there's ****ING BUS DOING 50 AND ONLY 20 FEET AWAY. JUMP, boy, jump. Straus didn't say that, and the researchers on the black community and spanking didn't say what you claimed. And many more fantastic delusional pontifications from on high that you have spewed are not more true that your babbling about these. Get HELP. You are exposing your STUPIDITY again, Kane. Just as STUPID as you claiming that using dummies in an automobile safety study makes it a CORRELATION study! I laugh so hard on that one asking myself how can anyone be SO STUPID! Doan |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
fools calling fools fools
No redeeming qualities whatsoever in any of
these fascist pigs. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FACTS That Make Roger & Bob Tilt. | Roger | Solutions | 71 | March 4th 06 12:18 AM |
IQ-160s Vote (with their *feet*) | [email protected] | Solutions | 119 | June 3rd 04 06:29 AM |
Plant Prattles HUGE destructive lie against relatives.... | Kane | Spanking | 33 | June 2nd 04 05:06 PM |
Plant Prattles HUGE destructive lie against relatives.... | Kane | Foster Parents | 34 | June 2nd 04 05:06 PM |
| off topic for Kane | Kane | General | 3 | April 25th 04 07:22 AM |