If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Beckhams have third boy - Cruz
http://edition.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/eu...ham.baby.reut/
I thought the gossip way back was that she was having a girl? "Vidal said Victoria Beckham could have a fourth child, but the risks would be greater." Interesting, most mortals are told 3 sections are the limit these days. Andrea |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Unadulterated Me" wrote I thought the gossip way back was that she was having a girl? Nah, it was announced around October that it was another boy. I remember thinking that she was either further on than they were saying or they'd had a CVS because she was only around 13/14 weeks at the time. "Vidal said Victoria Beckham could have a fourth child, but the risks would be greater." Interesting, most mortals are told 3 sections are the limit these days. I know someone who's had six, the most recent this time last year. The risks increase after 3 but if you get pregnant, they're gonna do another one. Jean |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Iuil wrote:
Interesting, most mortals are told 3 sections are the limit these days. I know someone who's had six, the most recent this time last year. The risks increase after 3 but if you get pregnant, they're gonna do another one. Yeah I know you can have more, wasn't it one of the Kennedy ladies who had 11 or something? It's just that most women are told to not get pregnant again after the third c/section or offered a tubal ligation during the c/section, but it seems they daren't be so presumtious to 'special people' like the Beckhams. She can have as many as her money can buy. Andrea |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 20 Feb 2005 22:13:50 -0000, "Iuil" wrote:
Nah, it was announced around October that it was another boy. I remember thinking that she was either further on than they were saying or they'd had a CVS because she was only around 13/14 weeks at the time. But if she was *really* further on than she let on, thats about right. My scan was the 20th IIRC. Megan -- Seoras David Montgomery, 7th May 2003, 17 hours. http://seoras.farr-montgomery.com EDD 11th March 2005 (another boy!) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"Unadulterated Me" wrote in message
Interesting, most mortals are told 3 sections are the limit these days. My friend's mother had 7 C-sections and that was back when sections were brand new. She died just last week at age 91. She was written up in the paper because of how many sections she had. And of course you know Sophie had four sections. -- Sue (mom to three girls) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
The risks increase after 3 but if you get pregnant, they're gonna do
another one. tell that to Leslie, she had a VBA3C. Anne |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"Anne Rogers" wrote The risks increase after 3 but if you get pregnant, they're gonna do another one. tell that to Leslie, she had a VBA3C. I knew that. I know others on c/s mailing lists who've done likewise. I shoulda added "if necessary", I guess. Jean |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Yeah I know you can have more, wasn't it one of the Kennedy ladies
who had 11 or something That gives me chills. I guess it's a good thing you can't know the future because if I had known after my first section I'd be having two more I would never have wanted to get pregnant again. Leslie |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
cruz...
hmmmm. i thought we were battling for names. good luck to you baby cruz. Wonder if they know penelope. or Tom. or he was conceived on one. c "Unadulterated Me" wrote in message ... http://edition.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/eu...ham.baby.reut/ I thought the gossip way back was that she was having a girl? "Vidal said Victoria Beckham could have a fourth child, but the risks would be greater." Interesting, most mortals are told 3 sections are the limit these days. Andrea |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
I have never heard of people having more than 3 c sections. The scar
tissue becomes weak to keep making incisions the woman would have to much difficulty in carrying the baby when getting to full term. Unadulterated Me wrote in message ... Iuil wrote: Interesting, most mortals are told 3 sections are the limit these days. I know someone who's had six, the most recent this time last year. The risks increase after 3 but if you get pregnant, they're gonna do another one. Yeah I know you can have more, wasn't it one of the Kennedy ladies who had 11 or something? It's just that most women are told to not get pregnant again after the third c/section or offered a tubal ligation during the c/section, but it seems they daren't be so presumtious to 'special people' like the Beckhams. She can have as many as her money can buy. Andrea |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Eu não gosto da cruz que afixa | HUMMER BM | Kids Health | 0 | November 20th 03 05:57 PM |