If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
2003 longitudal study - Roots of Teen Pregnancy is Fatherlessness
http://mensnewsdaily.com/2008/06/29/...atherlessness/
Rinaldo Del Gallo, III Roots of Teen Pregnancy is Fatherlessness June 29, 2008 It's often odd what people focus on. Was there a "pact" in Gloucester, Massachusetts for young girls to become pregnant or were these girls simply individually irresponsible? While the perversely salacious idea of simply using men as sperm donors literally made headlines around the world, what is more important is the fact that Gloucester is seeing a spike in teen pregnancy, pact or no pact. Teenagers know what causes pregnancy. They know how to prevent pregnancies. It does little to assume that these teenagers have the IQ of grapefruits and the worldly sophistication of a toddler. What we don't need is yet another government program. Teenagers become pregnant because they that lack values. So too with teenage boys that impregnate them. They lack values because they lack fathers. The high correlation between father absence and early teenage sexual activity and pregnancy has long been noted and is a conceded point. According to divorce magazine.com, "Fatherless homes account for . . . well over 50% of teen mothers." US Department of Health and Human Services summarizes the risks of sole custody, single parent families: "More than a quarter of American children-nearly 17 million-do not live with their father. Girls without a father in their life are two and a half times as likely to get pregnant." They may have understated the case. Despite the data, anti-fathers' rights groups have been trying to dismiss this data as misleading by arguing that while there is a high correlation between fatherlessness and teen pregnancy, there was no cause and effect relationship. But a relatively recent longitudinal study (2003) shows that the cause-and-effect relationship between teen pregnancy and fatherlessness may be much stronger than people thought. Bruce J. Ellis of the Department of Psychology at the University of Canterbury in Christchurch, New Zealand performed a study in conjunction with the National Institute of Mental Health and the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development in the United States. 242 girls living in one of three U.S. cities and 520 girls living in Christchurch, New Zealand were studied-a huge sampling body. The participant girls were interviewed annually from age 5 to 18, as well as their mothers. These longitudinal studies are exceedingly laborious but produce data that are hard if not impossible to obtain by a study done at one particular moment of time. This is the type of quality study that must be taken seriously. Fatherlessness was hardly the only measure being taken. The multiple interviews and questionnaires administered over the years to both parents and children yielded data that covered everything from family demographics to parenting styles and child behavioral problems to childhood academic performance. "A widely held assumption is that it is not father absence per se that is harmful to children, but the stress associated with divorce, family conflict, loss of a second parent, loss of an adult male income, and so on," Ellis stated. What Ellis does not mention (and rightfully so since his was a scientific work) was that the not-so-hidden political agenda was to stop the compelling argument for shared parenting legislation so that fathers could be more involved in their children's lives, but rather to advance arguments in favor of greater child support awards and enforcement, plus domestic violence legislation. The study found that girls who grew up in otherwise socially and economically privileged homes were not protected. "Father absence was so fundamentally linked to teenage pregnancy that its effects were largely undiminished by such factors as whether girls were rich or poor, black or white, New Zealand Maori or European, cooperative or defiant in temperament, born to adult or teenage mothers, raised in safe or violent neighborhoods, subjected to few or many stressful life events, reared by supportive or rejecting parents, exposed to functional or dysfunctional marriages, or closely or loosely monitored by parents," Ellis reported. Wow! Ellis concluded, "The current research suggests that, in relation to daughters' sexual development, the social address of father absence is important in its own right and not just as a proxy for its many correlates." It was found that "father absence was an overriding risk factor for early sexual activity and adolescent pregnancy." Conversely, father presence was a major protective factor against early sexual outcomes, amazingly, even if other risk factors were present. The city of Gloucester, Massachusetts, America, and frankly the nations across the world need to wake up. The problem of teen pregnancy is one of fatherlessness. Rinaldo Del Gallo, III The author is a practicing family law attorney, spokesperson of the Berkshire Fatherhood Coalition, and a columnist regarding legal issues. To read his other columns, go to BerkshireFatherhood.com. This column first ran in the Berkshire Eagle as "Roots of Fatherlessness" on Saturday, June 28, 2008. To read the study itself, click here. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
2003 longitudal study - Roots of Teen Pregnancy is Fatherlessness
"Dusty" wrote in message ... http://mensnewsdaily.com/2008/06/29/...atherlessness/ Rinaldo Del Gallo, III Roots of Teen Pregnancy is Fatherlessness June 29, 2008 It's often odd what people focus on. Was there a "pact" in Gloucester, Massachusetts for young girls to become pregnant or were these girls simply individually irresponsible? While the perversely salacious idea of simply using men as sperm donors literally made headlines around the world, what is more important is the fact that Gloucester is seeing a spike in teen pregnancy, pact or no pact. Teenagers know what causes pregnancy. They know how to prevent pregnancies. It does little to assume that these teenagers have the IQ of grapefruits and the worldly sophistication of a toddler. What we don't need is yet another government program. Teenagers become pregnant because they that lack values. So too with teenage boys that impregnate them. They lack values because they lack fathers. Note the PC language - "Teenagers become pregnant". Why not come right out and say teenage GIRLS become pregnant because they lack values? And the PC way of suggesting "teenage boys impregnate" the girls. I always resent those kinds of statements that suggest creating pregnancies is something boys do to girls. If, as the femwits say it's her body and her choice, then the choice for men and women begins long before any pregnacy whether they are married or not. What I'd like to see is a study that looks at how sexually active these teenage girls were before they got pregnant. I would bet the Gloucester girls didn't just get pregnant the first time they did it. The high correlation between father absence and early teenage sexual activity and pregnancy has long been noted and is a conceded point. According to divorce magazine.com, "Fatherless homes account for . . . well over 50% of teen mothers." US Department of Health and Human Services summarizes the risks of sole custody, single parent families: "More than a quarter of American children-nearly 17 million-do not live with their father. Girls without a father in their life are two and a half times as likely to get pregnant." They may have understated the case. Despite the data, anti-fathers' rights groups have been trying to dismiss this data as misleading by arguing that while there is a high correlation between fatherlessness and teen pregnancy, there was no cause and effect relationship. But a relatively recent longitudinal study (2003) shows that the cause-and-effect relationship between teen pregnancy and fatherlessness may be much stronger than people thought. The reason anti-father groups don't want to acknowlege fatherlessness as a risk factor is because the next question becomes "why is the father not present". It is so much easier to make a broadbrushed claim fathers run away from pregnant girl friends instead of looking at other factors like promiscuity, girls picking undesirable partners, and boys being pushed out of girls lives by unilateral decisions. Bruce J. Ellis of the Department of Psychology at the University of Canterbury in Christchurch, New Zealand performed a study in conjunction with the National Institute of Mental Health and the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development in the United States. 242 girls living in one of three U.S. cities and 520 girls living in Christchurch, New Zealand were studied-a huge sampling body. The participant girls were interviewed annually from age 5 to 18, as well as their mothers. These longitudinal studies are exceedingly laborious but produce data that are hard if not impossible to obtain by a study done at one particular moment of time. This is the type of quality study that must be taken seriously. Fatherlessness was hardly the only measure being taken. The multiple interviews and questionnaires administered over the years to both parents and children yielded data that covered everything from family demographics to parenting styles and child behavioral problems to childhood academic performance. "A widely held assumption is that it is not father absence per se that is harmful to children, but the stress associated with divorce, family conflict, loss of a second parent, loss of an adult male income, and so on," Ellis stated. What Ellis does not mention (and rightfully so since his was a scientific work) was that the not-so-hidden political agenda was to stop the compelling argument for shared parenting legislation so that fathers could be more involved in their children's lives, but rather to advance arguments in favor of greater child support awards and enforcement, plus domestic violence legislation. What an understatement. My personal experience testifying before state committees showed me the state bureaucrats and their special interest supports who profit from the policy decisions far outnumber the parents who try to relate to the legislature how their proposals will impact their constituents. The study found that girls who grew up in otherwise socially and economically privileged homes were not protected. "Father absence was so fundamentally linked to teenage pregnancy that its effects were largely undiminished by such factors as whether girls were rich or poor, black or white, New Zealand Maori or European, cooperative or defiant in temperament, born to adult or teenage mothers, raised in safe or violent neighborhoods, subjected to few or many stressful life events, reared by supportive or rejecting parents, exposed to functional or dysfunctional marriages, or closely or loosely monitored by parents," Ellis reported. Wow! Ellis concluded, "The current research suggests that, in relation to daughters' sexual development, the social address of father absence is important in its own right and not just as a proxy for its many correlates." It was found that "father absence was an overriding risk factor for early sexual activity and adolescent pregnancy." Conversely, father presence was a major protective factor against early sexual outcomes, amazingly, even if other risk factors were present. Children need both parents. Studies like this one consistently reach that conclusion. So the question becomes - why do we continue to establish and perpetuate public policy in family law that forces fathers out of children's lives? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
2003 longitudal study - Roots of Teen Pregnancy is Fatherlessness
"Bob W" wrote in If, as the femwits say it's her body and her choice, then the choice for men and women begins long before any pregnacy whether they are married or not. What I'd like to see is a study that looks at how sexually active these teenage girls were before they got pregnant. I would bet the Gloucester girls didn't just get pregnant the first time they did it. It's the same for fully grown adult women when they make the choice to have unprotected sex and then try to hold the man responsible to pay for all expenses. Men really do need to take more care around careless women as they have more to lose than just there wallet! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
In The Historical Roots of Political Correctness. | R. Steve Walz | Solutions | 48 | February 6th 07 04:47 AM |
Movies heavily shape teen smoking, study shows | Roman Bystrianyk | Kids Health | 0 | November 7th 05 10:47 AM |
Teen pregnancy / Daniel | Bebelestrnge | Single Parents | 0 | March 13th 04 12:10 PM |