If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
"spr" wrote in message
nk.net... "Dusty" wrote in I believe that by not being properly served, it places the court in a very poor light, establishing the courts disregard for due process and thereby either having the case retried in another court, or by having the case thrown out. It would depend on the type of case and other circumstances involved, but I am of the opinion that the case should be thrown out. I know that if you are properly served in a legal civil suit and they have the documentation to prove that you received a summons and you don't appear, they can carry out a judgement by default in which case you are automatically found guilty. Even when they do this, they are still required to send out a notice of the court's final decision. This was not the case for my friend who did not live in this country at the time the court was held. How the hell do you sue a foreigner who does not reside in the United States? I get quite a kick out of how you and I are "playing in the same orchestra, playing the same music, but using different instruments." Which is not a bad thing. Just shows we have slightly differing perspectives of the same subject. But that we both want the same goal - our children and our freedom back. Yes, we have a different appoach at solving the same issues! We both know what the issues are and what caused them, but now it's a matter of shedding light in the proper perspective, so the average American can relate or understand the issues at hand and how it can affect them too. If people realize that the courts are out of control and answer to no one, do you think somebody might take a second look at thie power issue and start getting concerned? Ah, but there-in lies the problem - getting people to open their eyes to take that much needed look at the problem. For the most part, people have gotten far to complacent. Unless a given person is actually down there in the trenches, fighting for their rights, there's every chance that no one will bother themselves to see and hear just what is going on around them - much less actually -do- something about it. Case in point - if you feed the people very small amounts of gruel each day and gradually increase the amount of gruel in their bowl (while removing the same proportion of soup), eventually they will accept the gruel (lies) as factual and the soup (truth), what's left of it, becomes very distasteful and they won't eat it. This is exactly what liberals and their man-hating friends the feminazis have done to the public for nearly 40 long years. The public accepts their drivel and they allow it to happen because they know no better. Oh, you can try to pry their eyes open, you can shout and yell at them to wake up, but it will be meet with staunch resistance. In short - they've become comfortable with our misery. The question becomes less of how to show the problem to the public, but more about how to get them to see through their eye lids. Unless we start to see courts ordering cops to start up public executions of fathers for not paying their court-ordered extortion (C$), the vast majority of the sleeping public will never wake up to what is really going on. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
"Dusty" wrote in For the most part, people have gotten far to complacent. Yes, the typical American has become spineless when issues like personal freedoms are at stake. They deserve the $3.00 a gallon gas that they fill up their SUV's with and will probably still do nothing when gas is $4.00 a gallon. Lets face it, Americans have become soft bellied sheep, as anyone that speaks out against the system is considered a rebel and outcast. I lost all faith in this country when a helpless woman was left to die, because it wasn't in the best interest of the politicians to get involved! Well that was yesterdays news, now they'll all be more concerned about who wins the American Idol contest! |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
"teachrmama" wrote in message ... "spr" wrote in message ink.net... Is it proper to assume that the courts are following standard procedure in regards to serving proper notice or summons to appear in court. Many Distant NCP's are never notified of any court proceedings against them until they are physically arrested for exceeding the financial arrearage limit. Summons are often sent to old addresses and not properly served as require by law. I have one friend who was considered served while he was not residing in this country? Even in a small claims court summons, the recipient has to received the summons before any case can proceed. Why is it different for CS cases? This is one that sticks in my craw, too. My husband was "notified" about a proceeding by "publication" in a "major newspaper" in a place that we hadn't lived for 2 years! Fortunately, we found out that, because he did not appear, he had been declared the father, and owed arrearages back to the birth of the child--we found out 2 days before the 6 month now-we-gotcha period was over, and rushed from Northern Ca to San Diego to file a proof-of-paternity demand in the nick of time. Otherwise we would never have been able to dig out of the hole. As it turned out, he is the child's father--though he didn't find out about her until she was almost 13. But, because of the proof of paternity filing, they could only go back 2 years with the arrearages rather than back to her birth plus all medical expenses. What really makes me mad is that they had our address all along--I have the proof. They did the publication thing precisely because they knew he would NOT get it. And contrast what happens about legal notification in other, much more minor, matters. Several years ago, when my daughter was still in a wild phase, she called me up in tears from a shopping center to ask me to come and get her. A police officer had stopped her and told her she was driving on a suspended license. It turned out that, months before, and unknown to me, my daughter had racked up quite a few speeding tickets. Without saying anything to me (although she was living with me at the time) she had gone to court and paid several significant fines. She thought that was the end of the matter, and so didn't stop driving. However, a week or so after her last court appearance, the state DMV had sent her a registered letter saying that she had now exceeded the number of points for moving violations, and thus her license was suspended. The fact that she had paid the fine counted for nothing in that context. She never picked up the DMV letter, although a notice came from the local post office saying it was waiting for her. At her trial on the driving on a suspended license charge, her lawyer successfully argued that, since she had not picked up the DMV letter, she had not been appropriately notified of the license suspension. She got off. Then think about this. A man is sent a letter, quite possibly to an outdated address, telling him that he has been named as the father of some woman's child, and if he wants to avoid a child support obligation, he must go in immediately for a DNA test. He never gets the letter, never goes in for a test, and is then subjected to a CS order. Much later, he finds out about the CS order and challenges it. He is found NOT to be the father. However, he will then be told that he's too late to challenge the CS order, and must pay the woman involved up to 18 years worth of CS -- and the time limit for challenging a CS order is imposed by the federal government, as a condition of the state getting federal welfare funds. If, on the other hand, the claim against the man was merely that he had been driving on a suspended license, much more care would have been taken to ensure that he had received proper notification. The plain fact is that, in matters where the interests of the two sexes are in conflict, in the U.S. today men's rights to elementary fairness count for nothing. It's just like what used to happen to blacks in the Jim Crow days in the south. And, unlike those days, there's absolutely no coverage in the media of what's going on. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Paternity Fraud - US Supreme Court | Wizardlaw | Child Support | 12 | June 4th 04 02:19 AM |
Mother's Paternity Fraud - US Supreme Court Case | TrashBBRT | Child Support | 8 | May 21st 04 05:52 PM |
Chiros ignoring BPI crime and the Schroeder/Rule 302 matter - was The Cost of Voicing Opinions on the Internet | Todd Gastaldo | Pregnancy | 0 | March 12th 04 01:53 AM |
Sample US Supreme Court Petition | Wizardlaw | Child Support | 28 | January 21st 04 06:23 PM |
Sample Supreme Court Petition | Wizardlaw | Child Support | 0 | January 16th 04 03:47 AM |