If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
Ericka Kammerer wrote:
If I had another child, I'm sure I'd say that I didn't regret having another child, but it would also involve life changes that I don't think are best for me and my family as they stand now. They're all *choices*. We could manage with another child. I just don't see it as optimal for us (others, obviously, have different equations for their families and circumstances). Yes, I think that's where we are, too. I'm sure there could be a time I'd regret not having another child. I regret the thought that I'm done *now*! I think this is probably the critical point for me. I doubt I'll ever really feel "done" or stop feeling a bit broody and nostalgic when I see a little baby. And that would be true whether I stop now at three kids or whether I had a fourth or whether I kept on having 'em until I couldn't any more. Maybe I should have started very young like Andrea so I could have as many as I wanted. But I didn't, and since there are many things I like about the life I have now that *couldn't* have happened if I'd started having children much younger, I don't regret that I don't have the option of having as many as I might optimally want. Does that make sense? -- Be well, Barbara Mom to Sin (Vernon, 2), Misery (Aurora, 5), and the Rising Son (Julian, 7) This week's suggested Bush/Cheney campaign bumper sticker: "Four More Wars!" All opinions expressed in this post are well-reasoned and insightful. Needless to say, they are not those of my Internet Service Provider, its other subscribers or lackeys. Anyone who says otherwise is itchin' for a fight. -- with apologies to Michael Feldman |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Leslie wrote:
Barbara said: You guys having your fourths have got to stop this! You're making me broody, and I'm done. (Repeats to self: I am done, I am done, I am done.") I really don't think you are sure enough about this, Barbara! LOL, I'll never be sure. In a perfect world, I'd have at least 2 or 3 more kids. But it's not a perfect world! -- Be well, Barbara Mom to Sin (Vernon, 2), Misery (Aurora, 5), and the Rising Son (Julian, 7) This week's suggested Bush/Cheney campaign bumper sticker: "Four More Wars!" All opinions expressed in this post are well-reasoned and insightful. Needless to say, they are not those of my Internet Service Provider, its other subscribers or lackeys. Anyone who says otherwise is itchin' for a fight. -- with apologies to Michael Feldman |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
Ericka said:
True, but having additional children *does* have consequences. snip They're all *choices*. We could manage with another child. I just don't see it as optimal for us (others, obviously, have different equations for their families and circumstances). I'm sure there could be a time I'd regret not having another child.snip The only thing that seems a given to me is that ideally you don't have more children than you can provide a decent life for. I don't disagree with anything you've said at all. And knowing both you and Barbara, I know what ever decisions you've made about family size would be well thought out. I do think, though, that lots of people stop before they are really ready because of preconceived g notions about what they can handle and what kids need. And they end up being sorry later. I just think that if you are on the fence, it's better to go ahead and have another than regret not doing it, you know? Every time we have a new baby it necessitates some change in whatever comfortable routine we have worked out up to that point. I always feel a little grief for that old life that has to change to make way for the new life. But then we adjust and get comfortable with that new life too. Leslie Emily (2/4/91) Jake (1/27/94) Teddy (2/15/95) William (3/5/01 -- VBA3C, 13 lbs. 5 oz.) and Lorelei, expected 11/2/04 "Children come trailing clouds of glory from God, which is their home." ~ William Wordsworth |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
Barbara said:
I think this is probably the critical point for me. I doubt I'll ever really feel "done" or stop feeling a bit broody and nostalgic when I see a little baby. And that would be true whether I stop now at three kids or whether I had a fourth or whether I kept on having 'em until I couldn't any more. I know people who say they know they are done, people here and IRL. I keep hoping that will happen to me at some point, because otherwise I don't know how I'll stop! Maybe I should have started very young like Andrea so I could have as many as I wanted. But I didn't, and since there are many things I like about the life I have now that *couldn't* have happened if I'd started having children much younger, I don't regret that I don't have the option of having as many as I might optimally want. Does that make sense? Sure it makes sense. Plus you'd have different children if you'd started sooner, and you can't regret the ones you have! Leslie Emily (2/4/91) Jake (1/27/94) Teddy (2/15/95) William (3/5/01 -- VBA3C, 13 lbs. 5 oz.) and Lorelei, expected 11/2/04 "Children come trailing clouds of glory from God, which is their home." ~ William Wordsworth |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
Leslie wrote:
Barbara said: I think this is probably the critical point for me. I doubt I'll ever really feel "done" or stop feeling a bit broody and nostalgic when I see a little baby. And that would be true whether I stop now at three kids or whether I had a fourth or whether I kept on having 'em until I couldn't any more. I know people who say they know they are done, people here and IRL. I keep hoping that will happen to me at some point, because otherwise I don't know how I'll stop! LOL, you might have to wait for menopause like my grandmother (who had her last at 47). But I know what you mean. I hear a lot of people say they are definitely done and they really don't *want* any more kids and I think, "Gosh, how could you not want more wonderful people in your family?" I don't mean to say I think it's bad not to want more kids or to be sure you're done--it's probably just the opposite--but I totally can't get my own mind around it! But I didn't, and since there are many things I like about the life I have now that *couldn't* have happened if I'd started having children much younger, I don't regret that I don't have the option of having as many as I might optimally want. Does that make sense? Sure it makes sense. Plus you'd have different children if you'd started sooner, and you can't regret the ones you have! Nope, that's certainly true. -- Be well, Barbara Mom to Sin (Vernon, 2), Misery (Aurora, 5), and the Rising Son (Julian, 7) This week's suggested Bush/Cheney campaign bumper sticker: "Four More Wars!" All opinions expressed in this post are well-reasoned and insightful. Needless to say, they are not those of my Internet Service Provider, its other subscribers or lackeys. Anyone who says otherwise is itchin' for a fight. -- with apologies to Michael Feldman |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
Circe wrote:
Maybe I should have started very young like Andrea so I could have as many as I wanted. But I didn't, and since there are many things I like about the life I have now that *couldn't* have happened if I'd started having children much younger, I don't regret that I don't have the option of having as many as I might optimally want. Does that make sense? Makes perfect sense to me ;-) I have always lamented a bit that I'm so far "behind" my mother, who started having kids early (I was born right before she turned 21). On the other hand, my life has been a lot easier because I didn't (not to mention I hadn't met my husband by then ;-) I like to think that if I'd taken a different route, I would have done as good a job with those challenges as my mother did, but I'm glad I didn't have to, all things considered. There are lots of things I'd like in life that I don't do/have because I don't think they're optimal in terms of the big picture. Heck, I'd love to live on chocolate, but I'm pretty sure that's sub-optimal over the long haul despite how it feels some days ;-) Best wishes, Ericka |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
Leslie wrote:
I do think, though, that lots of people stop before they are really ready because of preconceived g notions about what they can handle and what kids need. And they end up being sorry later. That's certainly true--and also people who go on and have more kids due to having unrealistic notions about what would be required to handle an additional child. And, of course, given that 50 percent of pregnancies aren't planned (including within married couples), a whole lotta folks haven't even made a proactive decision! I just think that if you are on the fence, it's better to go ahead and have another than regret not doing it, you know? I think that depends on the people involved. Some people would be better off taking the chance and going forward, while others are probably better remaining conservative. I think it just depends on the personalities. For me, it's hard to imagine not really enjoying another child regardless of the issues that come along with him or her, but I am blessed with resources and a personality that usually accommodates that sort of thing relatively well. Remember that when they survey parents, a staggeringly high number admit in anonymous situations that while they would *never* want to give up a child, if they knew then what they know now, they would have had fewer (or no) kids. This suggests to me that there are quite a few people for whom it would be better *not* to go forward if they were on the fence. Best wishes, Ericka |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
"Circe" wrote in message news:GCi2d.167196$4o.51680@fed1read01... Leslie wrote: Barbara said: I think this is probably the critical point for me. I doubt I'll ever really feel "done" or stop feeling a bit broody and nostalgic when I see a little baby. And that would be true whether I stop now at three kids or whether I had a fourth or whether I kept on having 'em until I couldn't any more. I know people who say they know they are done, people here and IRL. I keep hoping that will happen to me at some point, because otherwise I don't know how I'll stop! LOL, you might have to wait for menopause like my grandmother (who had her last at 47). But I know what you mean. I hear a lot of people say they are definitely done and they really don't *want* any more kids and I think, "Gosh, how could you not want more wonderful people in your family?" Well, you know, I have a wonderful family full of wonderful people, but really, our 3 bedroom house is feeling very full these days. And I don't want to spend any more time in the hospital or on bedrest. So I don't feel *too* bad saying I'm done. --angela |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
"Chotii" wrote in message ... "Circe" wrote in message news:GCi2d.167196$4o.51680@fed1read01... Leslie wrote: Barbara said: I think this is probably the critical point for me. I doubt I'll ever really feel "done" or stop feeling a bit broody and nostalgic when I see a little baby. And that would be true whether I stop now at three kids or whether I had a fourth or whether I kept on having 'em until I couldn't any more. I know people who say they know they are done, people here and IRL. I keep hoping that will happen to me at some point, because otherwise I don't know how I'll stop! LOL, you might have to wait for menopause like my grandmother (who had her last at 47). But I know what you mean. I hear a lot of people say they are definitely done and they really don't *want* any more kids and I think, "Gosh, how could you not want more wonderful people in your family?" Well, you know, I have a wonderful family full of wonderful people, but really, our 3 bedroom house is feeling very full these days. And I don't want to spend any more time in the hospital or on bedrest. So I don't feel *too* bad saying I'm done. --angela That's my thing now-my husband has mentioned a "next baby"-and all I can think of is "oh great, more months on bedrest!"-maybe I'll feel different after this one gets here, but at least for now, I don't think I'd be too disappointed if this ends up being my last pregnancy. |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
"Leslie" wrote in message ... Sophie said: I'm glad (soon) everyone will have someone on their side of the table And as for us, we just went out and bought a bigger table, and there is an empty chair on each side just waiting to be filled. :-) Woohoo Leslie! I hope that means a #6 will be coming along in a few years -- maybe when I have #3! -- -Sara whose new-to-me vehicle has four spots waiting to be filled after this little Someone arrives! Mommy to DD, 2 1/2 And Someone Due 2/05 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
I guess you're not all ignoring me... | [email protected] | Breastfeeding | 1 | February 28th 04 05:36 PM |
Anybody want to take a guess? (poll) | Kat | Pregnancy | 4 | January 23rd 04 08:09 PM |
Should CPS be allowed to remove infants on a guess? | Fern5827 | Foster Parents | 1 | January 13th 04 02:09 PM |
Can I guess how far along I am? | Jill | Pregnancy | 23 | September 19th 03 08:22 PM |
labor is near I guess - long | Stephanie | Pregnancy | 27 | August 28th 03 11:59 PM |