A Parenting & kids forum. ParentingBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » ParentingBanter.com forum » alt.support » Child Support
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

deadbeat and enabler list (another thread that went off topic)



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old October 15th 07, 01:48 AM posted to alt.child-support
Bob Whiteside
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 981
Default deadbeat and enabler list (another thread that went off topic)


"DB" wrote in message
. net...

"Gini" wrote in

So unless you have something useful to say, it's pointless posting here
because nobody is reading it! :-)

==
She doesn't know where "here," is--She thinks "here" is there (FamilyKB).


And that's a forum website with about 3 people! LOL


And two or three of them all use the same IP address to post.

I have to admit I did learn something new from them. Until one of them used
the term I had no idea what the word "niglet" meant. The Urban Dictionary
helped me out! Of course, I would be considered a racist if I used that
word.

  #22  
Old October 15th 07, 03:39 PM posted to alt.child-support
Illiana via FamilyKB.com
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 377
Default deadbeat and enabler list (another thread that went off topic)

DB wrote:
"Illiana via FamilyKB.com" u38194@uwe wrote in

She sure has a lot of free time for working 70 hours a week LOL

[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
I think you guys are paranoid. Can you prove I am on any ones kill file
list,


As you said, you are not computer savvy!

Lots of people read Usenet, but rarely post as they take a few minutes to
read things that are worthwhile!
They know the posters that are posting useful information, everything else
they filter out with an ignore list which eliminates a lot of the flack that
they just don't need to see.

By now they've figure out your posts are full of tripe, Arrest all the dead
beats, you keep beating the same old drum that previous Femwits used to
beat. They are gone now because nobody responded to them!

Right now you're just sparring with some of the long term regulars because
you provide some entertainment for them, they will soon tire of you and put
you on their Kill file list.

So unless you have something useful to say, it's pointless posting here
because nobody is reading it! :-)

I could understand if alt.child support was to only present the non custodial
point of view, but it is not. If you and yours don’t want to bother with what
my opinions and views are, it seems to me, you could have already moved on
with your life and your group. You did not, and that means you want to know
my opinions. Say no all you want, and make you lame attempts to insult me,
but that fact that you put so much effort in doing so leads to two
conclusions:
1. You like to read what I post, and my comments
2. You have no life, this is your life, and you own little world

Because, as you said, you can make it to where you don’t have to see it, if
you have a problem, do it. Then only the custodial parents will respond, and
I will not have to be laughing at your warped perception of reality.

--
Message posted via http://www.familykb.com

  #23  
Old October 15th 07, 04:16 PM posted to alt.child-support
Illiana via FamilyKB.com
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 377
Default deadbeat and enabler list (another thread that went off topic)

Bob Whiteside wrote:
"Gini" wrote in

[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]

And that's a forum website with about 3 people! LOL


And two or three of them all use the same IP address to post.

I have to admit I did learn something new from them. Until one of them used
the term I had no idea what the word "niglet" meant. The Urban Dictionary
helped me out! Of course, I would be considered a racist if I used that
word.

You are considered racist if you want to use it. Even thinking about using
that phrase makes you a racist. Black people are very sensitive, I guess 300
years of opression is bound to make one a little testy. You should not have
even shared the term with the rest of us.

--
Message posted via FamilyKB.com
http://www.familykb.com/Uwe/Forums.a...nting/200710/1

  #24  
Old October 15th 07, 06:05 PM posted to alt.child-support
Chris
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,421
Default deadbeat and enabler list (another thread that went off topic)


"DB" wrote in message
...

"Illiana via FamilyKB.com" u38194@uwe wrote in

She sure has a lot of free time for working 70 hours a week LOL

On Usenet, you can be anything you want, even a law enforcement clerk
working 70 hours per week! LOL


I think you guys are paranoid. Can you prove I am on any ones kill file
list,


As you said, you are not computer savvy!

Lots of people read Usenet, but rarely post as they take a few minutes to
read things that are worthwhile!
They know the posters that are posting useful information, everything else
they filter out with an ignore list which eliminates a lot of the flack

that
they just don't need to see.

By now they've figure out your posts are full of tripe, Arrest all the

dead
beats, you keep beating the same old drum that previous Femwits used to
beat. They are gone now because nobody responded to them!

Right now you're just sparring with some of the long term regulars because
you provide some entertainment for them, they will soon tire of you and

put
you on their Kill file list.

So unless you have something useful to say,


Yeah, starting with FACTS.

it's pointless posting here
because nobody is reading it! :-)







  #25  
Old October 15th 07, 07:58 PM posted to alt.child-support
Chris
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,421
Default deadbeat and enabler list (another thread that went off topic)


"No Spam" wrote in message
...

"Illiana" u38194@uwe wrote in message news:7996cd2fa0c2c@uwe...
Why is the DBP crew in every group, discussion, topic, and thread when

it
is
about child support? Is it possible for them to gripe anymore about
something
that is in place to help single parents take care of their children?
I wonder why those people are so adamant about not paying child support.
They
all claim not to be deadbeats, or enablers, yet their comments, way of
thinking, and bashing of the custodial parents tell a different story.


A good place to get DBP's noticed is

http://www.deadbeatparents.info

I posted my childrens father there, and it gives me a chance to share with
others.


LAME website, to say the least. LOL

I've noticed that out of your overwhelming membership of THREE (3), no one
identifies theirself. Even the Administrator conceals their identy. WHY?
Stand up and BE PROUD that you are going after the "deadbeats". LOL




----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet

News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+

Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption

=----


  #26  
Old October 15th 07, 08:12 PM posted to alt.child-support
Bob Whiteside
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 981
Default deadbeat and enabler list (another thread that went off topic)


"Illiana via FamilyKB.com" u38194@uwe wrote in message
news:79bb89b8f7437@uwe...
Bob Whiteside wrote:
"Gini" wrote in

[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]

And that's a forum website with about 3 people! LOL


And two or three of them all use the same IP address to post.

I have to admit I did learn something new from them. Until one of them
used
the term I had no idea what the word "niglet" meant. The Urban Dictionary
helped me out! Of course, I would be considered a racist if I used that
word.

You are considered racist if you want to use it. Even thinking about using
that phrase makes you a racist. Black people are very sensitive, I guess
300
years of opression is bound to make one a little testy. You should not
have
even shared the term with the rest of us.


Interesting twist of logic. The mother who uses a racially charged word
regarding their child is given a pass. But the person who hears it, and
thinks about what it means, is a racist.

  #27  
Old October 15th 07, 09:05 PM posted to alt.child-support
whatamess
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 223
Default deadbeat and enabler list (another thread that went off topic)

On Oct 15, 2:58 pm, "Chris" wrote:
"No Spam" wrote in message

...







"Illiana" u38194@uwe wrote in messagenews:7996cd2fa0c2c@uwe...
Why is the DBP crew in every group, discussion, topic, and thread when

it
is
about child support? Is it possible for them to gripe anymore about
something
that is in place to help single parents take care of their children?
I wonder why those people are so adamant about not paying child support.
They
all claim not to be deadbeats, or enablers, yet their comments, way of
thinking, and bashing of the custodial parents tell a different story.


A good place to get DBP's noticed is


http://www.deadbeatparents.info


I posted my childrens father there, and it gives me a chance to share with
others.


LAME website, to say the least. LOL

I've noticed that out of your overwhelming membership of THREE (3), no one
identifies theirself. Even the Administrator conceals their identy. WHY?
Stand up and BE PROUD that you are going after the "deadbeats". LOL



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet

News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.comThe #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+

Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption


=----- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Why exactly is it that women like Ileana feel that it's only the MAN's
responsibility
to take care of the children financially? It's funny because it's
pretty darn
obvious that you custodial mothers (not all, just some like Ileana)
want
to PUNISH the dad's for having slept with them and getting them
pregnant...
it's like because they were PUNISHED by having to take care of a
child,
they feel they should PUNISH the ex and make him pay...If your child
is such a drain on you, why did you have him? If he's such a drain on
you,
why don't you give him to the father? Because you want to control
everyone's
life...How sad that you feelt that YOUR sacrifice to raise your kid
means
that someone should pay you for it...Lousy excuse for women...very
sick.

  #28  
Old October 15th 07, 10:00 PM posted to alt.child-support
Chris
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,421
Default deadbeat and enabler list (another thread that went off topic)


"Illiana via FamilyKB.com" u38194@uwe wrote in message
news:79addffe777f7@uwe...
Kenneth S. wrote:
Why is the DBP crew in every group, discussion, topic, and thread when

it
is

[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
Is it possible to stop trying to bash custodial parents, and allow one

of
these threads to just have replies relevant to the topic?


I've been following this group for more than 10 years. As I see it,

one
of the group's functions is to provide those who read it with a wider
perspective on the issue of "child support" (a payment that I try to
remember always to put in quote marks, because the money isn't to support
children--very obviously, the money is intended to support the mothers of
the children in question). The wider perspective available here isn't to

be
found in the media in the U.S., because the media is almost universally
feminist and politically correct in outlook.

Here's one element in the wider perspective. "He should not be held
responsible for having sex, only I should," you say. So "child
support"--which is money you want to get from him--is a penalty for

having
sex? There's a name for those who get paid for having sex, and another

name
for those who pay to have sex. Those who pay to have sex are called

"johns"
by law enforcement. You may not want to think about the name assigned to
those who accept payment for having sex.

The simple truth about "child support" is that the rules all are

derived
from the fact that men pay it and women receive it. If any significant
number of women had to pay it, the system would look ENTIRELY different.
Also, there are indications in the research that there would be fewer
divorces and fatherless families if women thought there was any danger

that
they would have to pay CS, not receive it.

That is not true. There are a lot of men that are custodial parents,


And there are a lot of lottery winners too. So QUICK, run out and buy your
tickets so you too will win MILLIONS! Can you say "special pleading"?

women are requeired to pay child support. If the rule is in fact derived

from
the simple fact men pay and women get, then the term would be mother and
father, not custodial parent and non custodial parent.


"CP" and "NCP" are merely code words for mother/father which is nothing more
than propoganda to conceal the TRUTH! Of course "child support" and "in the
best interest of the children" are too. Argumentum ad misericordiam. So long
as people like you buy into it, then it is people like YOU who perpetuate
the lie.


--
Message posted via FamilyKB.com
http://www.familykb.com/Uwe/Forums.a...nting/200710/1




  #29  
Old October 16th 07, 02:19 AM posted to alt.child-support
Gini
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 936
Default deadbeat and enabler Brief Rant

X-No-Archive: no
"whatamess" wrote
................................

Why exactly is it that women like Ileana feel that it's only the MAN's
responsibility
to take care of the children financially? It's funny because it's
pretty darn
obvious that you custodial mothers (not all, just some like Ileana)
want
to PUNISH the dad's for having slept with them and getting them
pregnant...
it's like because they were PUNISHED by having to take care of a
child,
they feel they should PUNISH the ex and make him pay...If your child
is such a drain on you, why did you have him? If he's such a drain on
you,
why don't you give him to the father? Because you want to control
everyone's
life...How sad that you feelt that YOUR sacrifice to raise your kid
means
that someone should pay you for it...Lousy excuse for women...very
sick.

=====
OK--My Rant of the Month....Have I had one yet this month? Can't remember.
Oh well.
Women can blame the National Organization for Women for relegating them to
pathetic
government/man dependent, entitlement-minded creatures, incapable of
standing on their own two
feet with pride and confidence in their abilities to survive on their own
devices. NOW transformed
women's rights to equality to women's rights to preferential treatment
demanding that courts rescue
weak women from the throes of evil men. At the same time, they convinced an
entire
generation (or two) of women that if they did not go after these men
(defined only by gender), they were somehow
stupid and short-changing their children. Of course, those who welcomed this
attitude (weak, unmotivated
women), now would rather spend years digging and scratching for a few
pennies handout from men
and government, screaming with all their might that the men deserve to be
chased down like animals--for some reason, and
need to be taught a lesson--for something. Dignity and self-reliance in
women became chastised and ridiculed as faults rather
than virtues. The most tragic outcome is the creation of an entire
generation of girls who are taught they are more
important and smarter than men and can do perfectly fine without the
"idiots" as long as they get to take his wallet
when they leave. This is called having your cake and eating it too, and an
entire court system seemed quite happy
to pat them on the head and lament, "Poor girl." That is why women, such as
those we have seen deluging ACS from "FamilyKB" with the whining mantra
of "Please help me! He's sooo bad and I need rescued," both nauseate and
anger me just as all the advertisement/ marketing
portraying men as buffoons and morons worthy of nothing more than financing
women. If you are curious as to how all this
media/court portraiture might affect a generation of young boys and men, do
a web search of "looking-glass self," (which is usually
correctly cited as part of the "passive bigotry" [an oxymoron] that has
endangered generations of black men). Yeah, this ****es me off--I have five
extraordinarily important sons, including my stepson. So, in
conclusion.....You can mess with Texas all you want, but leave my sons alone
:-)


  #30  
Old October 16th 07, 04:13 AM posted to alt.child-support
teachrmama
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,905
Default deadbeat and enabler Brief Rant


"Gini" wrote in message
news:MkUQi.1798$pl2.479@trndny09...
X-No-Archive: no
"whatamess" wrote
...............................

Why exactly is it that women like Ileana feel that it's only the MAN's
responsibility
to take care of the children financially? It's funny because it's
pretty darn
obvious that you custodial mothers (not all, just some like Ileana)
want
to PUNISH the dad's for having slept with them and getting them
pregnant...
it's like because they were PUNISHED by having to take care of a
child,
they feel they should PUNISH the ex and make him pay...If your child
is such a drain on you, why did you have him? If he's such a drain on
you,
why don't you give him to the father? Because you want to control
everyone's
life...How sad that you feelt that YOUR sacrifice to raise your kid
means
that someone should pay you for it...Lousy excuse for women...very
sick.

=====
OK--My Rant of the Month....Have I had one yet this month? Can't remember.
Oh well.
Women can blame the National Organization for Women for relegating them to
pathetic
government/man dependent, entitlement-minded creatures, incapable of
standing on their own two
feet with pride and confidence in their abilities to survive on their own
devices. NOW transformed
women's rights to equality to women's rights to preferential treatment
demanding that courts rescue
weak women from the throes of evil men. At the same time, they convinced
an entire
generation (or two) of women that if they did not go after these men
(defined only by gender), they were somehow
stupid and short-changing their children. Of course, those who welcomed
this attitude (weak, unmotivated
women), now would rather spend years digging and scratching for a few
pennies handout from men
and government, screaming with all their might that the men deserve to be
chased down like animals--for some reason, and
need to be taught a lesson--for something. Dignity and self-reliance in
women became chastised and ridiculed as faults rather
than virtues. The most tragic outcome is the creation of an entire
generation of girls who are taught they are more
important and smarter than men and can do perfectly fine without the
"idiots" as long as they get to take his wallet
when they leave. This is called having your cake and eating it too, and an
entire court system seemed quite happy
to pat them on the head and lament, "Poor girl." That is why women, such
as those we have seen deluging ACS from "FamilyKB" with the whining mantra
of "Please help me! He's sooo bad and I need rescued," both nauseate and
anger me just as all the advertisement/ marketing
portraying men as buffoons and morons worthy of nothing more than
financing women. If you are curious as to how all this
media/court portraiture might affect a generation of young boys and men,
do a web search of "looking-glass self," (which is usually
correctly cited as part of the "passive bigotry" [an oxymoron] that has
endangered generations of black men). Yeah, this ****es me off--I have
five
extraordinarily important sons, including my stepson. So, in
conclusion.....You can mess with Texas all you want, but leave my sons
alone


Excellent rant, Gini. =c)


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
CT: New Haven witch hunt for deadbeat fathers - notice that NO mothers were on their list... Dusty Child Support 1 April 5th 05 06:37 AM
Guest Speaker: Dr. Rita Laws Topic: Topic: Why Kids Lie and What We Can Do About It wexwimpy Foster Parents 0 March 2nd 04 06:42 PM
Waiting list for POFAK mailing list Herself General 3 October 15th 03 06:26 PM
Waiting list for POFAK mailing list Herself Breastfeeding 3 October 15th 03 06:26 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 ParentingBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.