If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
A bike
Three children appoximately 3 years between each of them. #1 and #3 are
tall, #2 is small. All use their bikes, although perhaps at that time #3 uses the bike slightly more round the garden. The bikes are not bought new, second hand, and then passed down the family. #1 has just moved onto a new (to them) bike. When #2 is out parent notices that #3 who is also still using stabilisers (in case that's a UK term that's the extra wheels preschoolers use to help them balance) is getting a little too big for him bike. He's still happily using it, but is outgrowing it. So they lower #2's bike down and put the stabilisers on. When #2 comes back, they object to having their bike taken, but parent points out that #1's old bike is available. When #1's old bike is got out, however, even lowered to the lowest point, it is clear that it is too tall to the point of danger and #2 falls off as soon as they try and stop. There is no question of buying another bike for any of them. What do you do? Debbie |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
A bike
"Welches" wrote:
Three children appoximately 3 years between each of them. #1 and #3 are tall, #2 is small. All use their bikes, although perhaps at that time #3 uses the bike slightly more round the garden. The bikes are not bought new, second hand, and then passed down the family. #1 has just moved onto a new (to them) bike. When #2 is out parent notices that #3 who is also still using stabilisers (in case that's a UK term that's the extra wheels preschoolers use to help We called them 'training wheels' them balance) is getting a little too big for his bike. He's still happily using it, but is outgrowing it. So they lower #2's bike down and put the stabilisers on. When #2 comes back, they object to having their bike taken, but parent points out that #1's old bike is available. When #1's old bike is got out, however, even lowered to the lowest point, it is clear that it is too tall to the point of danger and #2 falls off as soon as they try and stop. There is no question of buying another bike for any of them. What do you do? Debbie I'd go back to the original bikes until either #3 or #2 is tall enough to use #1's original bike. Or else I'd trade #3's original bike for a bigger one. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
A bike
It would be nice if our children all grew at the same rate, wouldn't it
I'd go back to the original bikes for #2 and #3, too- sounds as if #2 has been done out of a bike! Anyway, I feel that riding a too-small bike round the garden is less of a problem than riding a dangerous bike elsewhere, so no contest at the moment. How long is #2 likely to take to grow into the larger bike? Jo "Rosalie B." wrote in message ... "Welches" wrote: Three children appoximately 3 years between each of them. #1 and #3 are tall, #2 is small. All use their bikes, although perhaps at that time #3 uses the bike slightly more round the garden. The bikes are not bought new, second hand, and then passed down the family. #1 has just moved onto a new (to them) bike. When #2 is out parent notices that #3 who is also still using stabilisers (in case that's a UK term that's the extra wheels preschoolers use to help We called them 'training wheels' them balance) is getting a little too big for his bike. He's still happily using it, but is outgrowing it. So they lower #2's bike down and put the stabilisers on. When #2 comes back, they object to having their bike taken, but parent points out that #1's old bike is available. When #1's old bike is got out, however, even lowered to the lowest point, it is clear that it is too tall to the point of danger and #2 falls off as soon as they try and stop. There is no question of buying another bike for any of them. What do you do? Debbie I'd go back to the original bikes until either #3 or #2 is tall enough to use #1's original bike. Or else I'd trade #3's original bike for a bigger one. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
A bike
"Rosalie B." wrote in message ... "Welches" wrote: Three children appoximately 3 years between each of them. #1 and #3 are tall, #2 is small. All use their bikes, although perhaps at that time #3 uses the bike slightly more round the garden. The bikes are not bought new, second hand, and then passed down the family. #1 has just moved onto a new (to them) bike. When #2 is out parent notices that #3 who is also still using stabilisers (in case that's a UK term that's the extra wheels preschoolers use to help We called them 'training wheels' them balance) is getting a little too big for his bike. He's still happily using it, but is outgrowing it. So they lower #2's bike down and put the stabilisers on. When #2 comes back, they object to having their bike taken, but parent points out that #1's old bike is available. When #1's old bike is got out, however, even lowered to the lowest point, it is clear that it is too tall to the point of danger and #2 falls off as soon as they try and stop. There is no question of buying another bike for any of them. What do you do? Debbie I'd go back to the original bikes until either #3 or #2 is tall enough to use #1's original bike. Or else I'd trade #3's original bike for a bigger one. Check with friends? I believe there are some little bikes and tricycles which are probably on their 6th or 7th child in my mom's group, because they're outgrown within a year. There are always grandparents and the like who buy new bikes, so the supply of ones too damaged to be easily repaired is balanced by new ones. We do that with a lot of clothes and toys-anything that only lasts a year or two before it's outgrown. Since so many families only have 1-2 children now, it's really the only economical way to manage. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
A bike
Welches wrote:
Three children appoximately 3 years between each of them. #1 and #3 are tall, #2 is small. All use their bikes, although perhaps at that time #3 uses the bike slightly more round the garden. The bikes are not bought new, second hand, and then passed down the family. #1 has just moved onto a new (to them) bike. When #2 is out parent notices that #3 who is also still using stabilisers (in case that's a UK term that's the extra wheels preschoolers use to help them balance) is getting a little too big for him bike. He's still happily using it, but is outgrowing it. So they lower #2's bike down and put the stabilisers on. When #2 comes back, they object to having their bike taken, but parent points out that #1's old bike is available. When #1's old bike is got out, however, even lowered to the lowest point, it is clear that it is too tall to the point of danger and #2 falls off as soon as they try and stop. There is no question of buying another bike for any of them. What do you do? Backtrack promptly. #2's bike shouldn't have been taken away without discussion. Perhaps the tact at this point is to see if it's possible to sell/trade/whatever the bike that doesn't work for anyone to acquire a bike that will work for the odd kid out. Best wishes, Ericka |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
A bike
Welches wrote:
When #2 comes back, they object to having their bike taken, but parent points out that #1's old bike is available. When #1's old bike is got out, however, even lowered to the lowest point, it is clear that it is too tall to the point of danger and #2 falls off as soon as they try and stop. There is no question of buying another bike for any of them. If there was really no way to get #2 an appropriate bike I'd go back to the original plan or #2 is out a bike. If #3's bike is getting small - maybe take the training wheels off and he can learn to ride it without. -- Nikki |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
A bike
Welches wrote:
Three children appoximately 3 years between each of them. #1 and #3 are tall, #2 is small. All use their bikes, although perhaps at that time #3 uses the bike slightly more round the garden. The bikes are not bought new, second hand, and then passed down the family. #1 has just moved onto a new (to them) bike. When #2 is out parent notices that #3 who is also still using stabilisers (in case that's a UK term that's the extra wheels preschoolers use to help them balance) is getting a little too big for him bike. He's still happily using it, but is outgrowing it. So they lower #2's bike down and put the stabilisers on. When #2 comes back, they object to having their bike taken, but parent points out that #1's old bike is available. When #1's old bike is got out, however, even lowered to the lowest point, it is clear that it is too tall to the point of danger and #2 falls off as soon as they try and stop. There is no question of buying another bike for any of them. Give back their old bike back to #2. #3 continues to use the bike which is a bit small. Could #2 and #3 use the same bike at the same height adjustment? -- Penny Gaines UK mum to three |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
A bike
"Welches" wrote in message
... When #2 comes back, they object to having their bike taken, but parent points out that #1's old bike is available. When #1's old bike is got out, however, even lowered to the lowest point, it is clear that it is too tall to the point of danger and #2 falls off as soon as they try and stop. There is no question of buying another bike for any of them. I would have them share the bike. They are siblings and sharing is part of growing up. #3 can't help it that he outgrew the bike. Do all 3 want to ride bikes at the same time, everytime? Will #2 fit on #3's bike, since #2 is small? I would start trying to find another family to trade bikes with, and search the thrift shops. Marie |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
A bike
Nikki wrote:
Welches wrote: When #2 comes back, they object to having their bike taken, but parent points out that #1's old bike is available. When #1's old bike is got out, however, even lowered to the lowest point, it is clear that it is too tall to the point of danger and #2 falls off as soon as they try and stop. There is no question of buying another bike for any of them. If there was really no way to get #2 an appropriate bike I'd go back to the original plan or #2 is out a bike. If #3's bike is getting small - maybe take the training wheels off and he can learn to ride it without. It also occurs to me to wonder if #1's "new" bike would fit #2. Would it adjust down enough for him? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
A bike
I personally would check craigslist.org to see if I could find another cheap
bike. -- Sue (mom to three girls) "Welches" wrote in message ... Three children appoximately 3 years between each of them. #1 and #3 are tall, #2 is small. All use their bikes, although perhaps at that time #3 uses the bike slightly more round the garden. The bikes are not bought new, second hand, and then passed down the family. #1 has just moved onto a new (to them) bike. When #2 is out parent notices that #3 who is also still using stabilisers (in case that's a UK term that's the extra wheels preschoolers use to help them balance) is getting a little too big for him bike. He's still happily using it, but is outgrowing it. So they lower #2's bike down and put the stabilisers on. When #2 comes back, they object to having their bike taken, but parent points out that #1's old bike is available. When #1's old bike is got out, however, even lowered to the lowest point, it is clear that it is too tall to the point of danger and #2 falls off as soon as they try and stop. There is no question of buying another bike for any of them. What do you do? Debbie |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Emma's new bike | Claire Petersky | General | 3 | September 4th 07 11:42 PM |
Bike insurance in NYC? | wrestleantares | General | 1 | January 25th 04 11:57 AM |
Big wheel Bike | JustMe | General | 1 | September 5th 03 05:12 PM |
Exercise-stationary bike | Hermitwolves20 | Pregnancy | 1 | August 29th 03 06:30 PM |
learning to ride a bike | Mary Ann Tuli | General | 3 | August 28th 03 09:50 PM |