If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#181
|
|||
|
|||
Runnin from Custodial Parent
On Sep 27, 3:46 pm, "Gini" wrote:
"Very Determined!" wrote ........................... Bob, are you from Texas? == Jennie, are you from Las Vegas? if you know why do you ask? and whats it to you? |
#182
|
|||
|
|||
Runnin from Custodial Parent
"Chris" wrote in message ... "teachrmama" wrote in message ... "Ray Fischer" wrote in message ... Relayer wrote: "Chris" wrote: Newsflash: Men don't make children. Yes they do. Are you insane? Men don't make children. At most they make sperm. Only women make children. Nonsense. It takes both the man's and the woman's contribution to create the child. I guess "Goodyear" makes cars.......... Are you denying that it requires a man's sperm to create a child? My point of disagreement with the system is not that a man has no responsibility in the creation of the child, because. of course, he does. It's that, after conception, all rights belong to the woman--the man is just along for whatever ride she chooses to take. The woman has all the choices after the man part and woman part get together, but as for the original conception, it takes both. |
#183
|
|||
|
|||
Runnin from Custodial Parent
wrote in message ups.com... On Sep 26, 6:43 pm, "DB" wrote: "Very Determined!" wrote in Which some one cross posted to talk.abortion. Any SOB that father a child and refuses to support that child, should be fixed like a stray dog. That is an excellent idea! Lets extend that to woman that can't afford to feed their own kids! It wouldn't need to be extended to women, once the deadbeat *******s are fixed, they can't make anymore children to abandon financially, and there wouldn't be any women that couldn't support their kids. Does DB stand for dead beat? You mean that it's ok for a woman to have 6 ******* children by 6 different men, even though she knows full well she can't even provide her 50% of the support for child #1, but that all 6 men should be sterilized for the crime of getting Susie Slut pregnant? |
#184
|
|||
|
|||
Runnin from Custodial Parent
"Very Determined!" wrote in message ps.com... On Sep 27, 3:17 pm, "Chris" wrote: wrote in message ups.com... On Sep 26, 6:43 pm, "DB" wrote: "Very Determined!" wrote in Which some one cross posted to talk.abortion. Any SOB that father a child and refuses to support that child, should be fixed like a stray dog. That is an excellent idea! Lets extend that to woman that can't afford to feed their own kids! It wouldn't need to be extended to women, once the deadbeat *******s are fixed, they can't make anymore children to abandon financially, and there wouldn't be any women that couldn't support their kids. Translation: So long as the lazy woman is extorting free cash from the biological father of her children, SHE is supporting them. It's thinking like this that is perpetuating generational welfare. Does DB stand for dead beat?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - what about the women who do work? That's good. They should. And they should definitely provide their share of the needs of the child--and all of the luxuries that she feels her child needs, since the father should not be required to provide for more than just needs. |
#185
|
|||
|
|||
Runnin from Custodial Parent
"Very Determined!" wrote in message ps.com... On Sep 27, 3:03 pm, "Chris" wrote: wrote in message oups.com... On Sep 27, 4:35 am, (Ray Fischer) wrote: wrote: Idiot-she said she left it alone for 10 years-not that she has been trying to collct for 10 years. Point is, nobody forced him to spill his seed to make a child, and there is a court order for support, he needs to pay it. In short, your argument is that women are whores and men must pay for sex. Do you ever notice how immoral and corrupt your anti-choice position is? -- Ray Fischer Once again...Cover your dick. It causes no harm to put a rubber on your dick! The deadbeat's only have themselves to blame. Uhuh. And the next time some woman gets raped, she will have only HERSELF to blame because she didn't cover her body in a burka when out in public. - Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - women in burka's still get raped...rape, such an ugly thing, more like surprise sex? And men who "put a rubber on" still get charged "child support". Your point? |
#186
|
|||
|
|||
Runnin from Custodial Parent
"Very Determined!" wrote in message ups.com... On Sep 27, 3:06 pm, "Chris" wrote: "Bob Whiteside" wrote in message ... wrote in message ups.com... On Sep 26, 3:17 pm, "DB" wrote: "Very Determined!" wrote in Why is it the public's problem to solve a woman's own personal problem? He is no longer a personal problem, he is everyone's problem now, because he is moving from state to state and creating more children, children he cannot take care of and where maybe some of the children are living off mine and your tax dollars...well, Our tax dollars are spent by our caring government well before we get a chance to earn them! Another $200 Billion for Iraq next year, that's now a Trillion dollars to help another country. Don't make your own personal problems of supporting your family a national one! Stop complaining about the damn tax dollars! If you don't want child supports to be a national problem (of course it already is since the child support debt is over 64 billion dollars) then write to your state legislator and request them to make the laws stricter for evaders, or just sign my petition. It's only a problem when people like you complain but do nothing. The 64 billion dollars of CS owed is a phony-baloney number put out by the government bureaucrats to justify the existence of the Federal OCSE. The 64 billion includes the government's estimate of what would be owed if parents with private agreements had gone through the CS system. And it includes dollars they claim to have not collected going back to the inception of the CS program in the mid-80's. Some of those children are now close to, or over 40 years old, by now. The government adds each new year of uncollected CS to the old number to ensure the number grows. Any number greater than ZERO is a mythical debt since child support, by definition, does not fulfill the parameters of a debt. - Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - whose debt? NO one's debt since there is no debt. But if you are inquiring as to who is being charged with the phony (make believe) debt better known as "child support", well, the answer is most likely a father. |
#187
|
|||
|
|||
Runnin from Custodial Parent
Very Determined:
My original post was not about my past... It never is with custodial females. For them, their past and their actions are off limits, it's all only about the scumbag deadbeat guy; addressing their own mistakes and responsibilities is taboo. |
#188
|
|||
|
|||
Runnin from Custodial Parent
wrote in message oups.com... On Sep 26, 3:30 pm, "Chris" wrote: "Very Determined!" wrote in message oups.com... On Sep 26, 11:09 am, "Chris" wrote: wrote in message roups.com... To everything I have read above, I think it is quite Brazen and Rude to be so judgmental in a negative way toward her wanting to get the child support that was COURT ORDERED to her. This man IS a DEADBEAT and she has Every Right to use Whatever Resource she can to try and seek the help of the public to find him. If more people would do this, it would make it tougher on deadbeats to hide their money. There would be less tax dollars being spent on Many Things if these DEADBEATS were located and forced to pay their Court Ordered JUDGEMENT. This man has an obligation to fulfill.... and it doesnt matter how long it takes for him to pay off his Court Ordered Obligation, he should be forced to do so... and if he ends up arrested and given a work release to do so... that would be the best case scenario. And if he chooses to not work? He should show his child RESPECT by doing so willingly. What he owes is not actually near what it takes to raise a child. Get off your soapbox about what she wants for herself. She is entitled to that money or their wouldnt be a court order. It is money to raise the child. I'm sure she will continue to provide things for that child after moving out of the home... with money still coming in from arrears. I fully support her efforts in what she is doing. And when her child sees what she has done (as that person tried to make it sound the child would be ashamed or angry and the mother would need forgiveness... give me a break !! Geez !!), the child will know how much effort she has put into taking up for BOTH their rights. I have my deadbeat plastered all over. I showed my teen children and asked their opinion before I did it. I had my ex ARRESTED with my poster in one day. After he was bonded out by his cash employer, I am taking pics of him working on jobsites to give to the judge when we go back to court. I will do anything I can to make the public aware that they can help many children and the custodial parents by getting active in taking pics and sending them in when they know someone is working for cash and hiding it. It benefits everyone (tax dollars) by Taking a Stand against this ignorant behavior that deadbeats have. My children SEE how their father hides his money... and there is several incomes in his home, which none of my children have ever lived in with his "new family". I dont have enough time to write about all that fraudulent crap. My children are hurt by their fathers excuses he gives every time he sees them... and even though he doesnt pay, I dont stand in the way whenever they want to see each other. I keep their channels open between them. I dont let his ignorance of not paying be a reason they cant see each other... he does a good enough job of that by being in the same town and seldom making contact... my kids usually have to go hunt him down. Deadbeats are Deadbeats in many ways. You cant change their habits, but you can make them see they are WRONG. You can help the system make it harder on them to hide by being active in supporting Custodial Parents and the children involved. You people that judge and put her down, Shame on You. She is doing what she has to do. YOU PEOPLE need to be active in turning in people when you know its going on... whoever and wherever it is. Turning a blind eye doesnt make the problem go away for the child and custodial parent. Making snide comments does no good. Until you walk in our shoes, dont throw stones. If you have money owed to you and you dont do anything, that is not in the best interest of you and your child. Child Support Enforcement and police can only do so much.... there isnt enough Tax Money for them to do all the Work WE Have To Do to help push this hard enough to Find The Offender. I dont have the time to debate with those of you making catty, snide comments about our Responsibility to see this through. I will check in here and there. We do what we have to do... and we do it with PRIDE in hopes of making a difference in our children's lives... and YES... our lives too. Those DeadBeats have a responsibility to US and some day laws will be stronger, and your tax dollars wont be as affected because we Took A Stand in making a difference. And Maybe... just maybe... Everyones Children wont have to go through as much as we do when they have children of their own because We Cared To Put Ourselves On The Line To Be Chastised By People Who Dont Understand Our Mission. ........ which is to extort FREE MONEY! - Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I have been foiled again...to extort free money, yes! Rob a bank, it's quicker. Not to mention, you stand a far better chance of getting a bigger take. Luckily, some"one" caught up to me before the courts did...my conscience was getting the best of me.I can see this is going to be a challenge to see who the courts will prosecute first, me for extorting free money, or the NCP for defaulting on a judgment he is "legally" obligated to pay? Apparently, your exhausting use of the word "legal" implies that you equate "legality" with "morality". Am I wrong? - Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Yes, you are wrong. Then it follows that "she" either denies the concept of morality, or "she" condones immoral behavior. You have not caught on to the fact that she is making fun of you. I'm not surprised though, from what I've read so far, you're not the brightest star in the sky. You must be quite foolish to not have caught on like 3 responses ago. Thank you for your opinion. I caught it, and it's funny that you try to sound intelligent, No I don't. and perhaps you are in your own way, just not in the right way. |
#189
|
|||
|
|||
Runnin from Custodial Parent
"teachrmama" wrote in message ... "Very Determined!" wrote in message ps.com... On Sep 27, 3:17 pm, "Chris" wrote: wrote in message ups.com... On Sep 26, 6:43 pm, "DB" wrote: "Very Determined!" wrote in Which some one cross posted to talk.abortion. Any SOB that father a child and refuses to support that child, should be fixed like a stray dog. That is an excellent idea! Lets extend that to woman that can't afford to feed their own kids! It wouldn't need to be extended to women, once the deadbeat *******s are fixed, they can't make anymore children to abandon financially, and there wouldn't be any women that couldn't support their kids. Translation: So long as the lazy woman is extorting free cash from the biological father of her children, SHE is supporting them. It's thinking like this that is perpetuating generational welfare. Does DB stand for dead beat?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - what about the women who do work? That's good. They should. And they should definitely provide their share of the needs of the child--and all of the luxuries that she feels her child needs, since the father should not be required to provide for more than just needs. "Their share" is ONE HUNDRED PERCENT! Since the mother made the SOLE (legal) choice to create her child, and she has the SOLE (legal) right to such child, it follows that she should also be SOLELY responsible for the care of her child. What's wrong with my equation? |
#190
|
|||
|
|||
Runnin from Custodial Parent
"teachrmama" wrote in message ... "Chris" wrote in message ... "teachrmama" wrote in message ... "Ray Fischer" wrote in message ... Relayer wrote: "Chris" wrote: Newsflash: Men don't make children. Yes they do. Are you insane? Men don't make children. At most they make sperm. Only women make children. Nonsense. It takes both the man's and the woman's contribution to create the child. I guess "Goodyear" makes cars.......... Are you denying that it requires a man's sperm to create a child? NO! I actually affirm it by inference in my above statement. My point of disagreement with the system is not that a man has no responsibility in the creation of the child, because. of course, he does. It's that, after conception, all rights belong to the woman--the man is just along for whatever ride she chooses to take. Your above two claims violate the concept of rights/responsibilities. In other words, they are mutually exclusive statements. The woman has all the choices after the man part and woman part get together, but as for the original conception, it takes both. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What? I thought DCSE is not supposed to represent the custodial parent. | [email protected] | Child Support | 4 | September 3rd 07 11:00 PM |
A single parent faces a unique set of challenges. Let me work with you to overcome them and grow into the best parent you can be! | kelly | Child Support | 6 | June 23rd 07 04:32 AM |
father becoming custodial parent and changing child support orders | toddneedsadvise | Child Support | 21 | January 4th 07 09:47 PM |
Custodial Parent Won't Communicate | Child Support | 23 | May 22nd 04 04:31 PM | |
Social Services: Non Custodial Parent Weapon? | Jason Fackler | Single Parents | 3 | December 9th 03 02:50 PM |