A Parenting & kids forum. ParentingBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » ParentingBanter.com forum » misc.kids » General
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Ken Pangborn reneges on word



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 27th 07, 04:05 AM posted to alt.support.child-protective-services,alt.parenting.spanking,alt.support.foster-parents,misc.kids,alt.dads-rights.unmoderated
0:->
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,968
Default Ken Pangborn reneges on word

Greegor wrote:
Kane was forced to admit that the reference
showed correlation but not causality,


"forced?"

I made the observation long before I used the word, "concede" which I
used to cut Ken and Doan off from their escapist use of the title to
avoid discussing the actual study.

and that
the title wrongly asserted causality,


That is true ONLY if one presumes the title does in fact reflect the
content of the article or the study. It did not. It was not wrong
because it asserted causality but because it did not conform to the
content of either.

I predicted
the usual mental masturbation from Kane.


You are lying.

Nailed dead to rights Kane just weasels MORE.

Nothing to weasel.

Ken lied, and Doan IS lying.

I made NO claim the study or the article was trying to claim cause.

I pointed out myself the title was not consistent with either.

What's the idea, Kane, to BURY your CONCESSION
among all of this volume of denial?


Me? Bury it? I've demanded Doan POST IT...he has kept it buried and
simply screamed accusations without providing the original proof.

He's a liar. You are a liar. Ken's a liar, because you will make
accusations then refuse, when confronted, to show the proof.

So, where IS my "concession," Greg? In it's full context.

You need to read my "concession." All it was was another way of saying
what I had already said...that the title did not accurately represent
the content of the article or study.

That is what I conceded.


Do you think it will work?


Work to get Doan or Ken to honestly discuss the study?

No, but I had hopes.

Work to get them to provide the proof of their accusation about my
"concession?" Hope. But I had hopes.

So far my hopes are dashed.

They are still avoiding the actual article and their errors.

And they are using the title, as you are, to make a claim about my
statements that is not true.

Tell you what. YOU bring the posts up and show where I concede that the
article or the study tried to claim cause.

Go for it, Liar.

Or better, YOU argue the content of the study with me. Let's see How YOU
run now. Just like Ken and Doan.

By the way, leave the ****ing addresses alone.

You touch them and I'll start posting your posts to even MORE relevant
newsgroups where those that recognize liars and thugs like you are even
LESS tolerant than I am.

I'm tired of your thuggery, Greg.

0:]
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ken Pangborn reneges on word Greegor Spanking 133 March 6th 07 04:16 PM
Ken Pangborn reneges on word Greegor Foster Parents 133 March 6th 07 04:16 PM
reading Stephanie General 65 November 28th 05 07:23 AM
Teaching a 5 yo to read Jim General 42 May 2nd 05 02:59 AM
A praise report. PRAISE GOD!!! [email protected] Solutions 8 April 23rd 05 02:44 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 ParentingBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.