If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Just for those that understand IP addy generation... Check'Alina's' IP address yourself.
YUP! And he is making a fool of himself in public without even knowing it. What a ignoranus! Doan On Wed, 28 Feb 2007, Condoleezza HaHa wrote: 0:- wrote: Don - you are hilarious in addition to being clueless. Web Developer - hahahahahahahahahahaha Well, at least it got you access to the kiddies. 0:- wrote: This one's just for you and I, Doan, as I doubt anyone here understands the significance of this source for proving that an IP is not a REAL poster's IP but a fake, made up, used by the commercial vendor as an internal code, showing in the log, triggering automatically to then forwarding mail to the subscriber to the anonymizing service who that fake number has been assigned to. http://www.senderbase.org/search?sea...48.233.119.168 Yes, it's "Senderbase," that will tell you if an IP number has traffic. If it does have "traffic," it's a real assigned IP number. If not...OOOooooOOOOOoooo....it's a fake...a proxie. So let us look, shall we then? Report on IP address: 148.233.119.168 Volume Statistics for this IP Magnitude Vol Change vs. Average Last day 0.0 -100% Last 30 days 0.0 -100% Average 0.0 Third-party Certification Sender Score Certified? Not Certified TRUSTe Privacy Seal? Not Certified Information from whois Please wait...loading data... Other information about this IP address Sender Category unknown Network Owner unknown Domain unknown Date of first message seen from this address CIDR range unknown # of domains controlled by this network owner 0 Geography data Country unknown State unknown City unknown Postal code unknown Related links Google groups http://groups.google.com/groups?scor...+group:*abuse* SpamCop http://spamcop.net/w3m?action=checkb...48.233.119.168 Real-time blacklists [ Click to view all ] dynablock.njabl.org Dynamic IP - http://www.njabl.org/cgi-bin/lookup....48.233.119.168 No address list shown since no email was detected from 148.233.119.0/24. ... It seems as though a certain RANGE of IP numbers are NOT real IP numbers at all...fancy that, eh? UnhOh, Doan. UnhOOOOh. Dear me. No such poster, by IP, exists, at least according to this. But just to check.....R R RR R R R R ... Let's DO check my IP number like YOU suggested and see if I'm posting from a fake IP. 209.216.178.77 http://www.senderbase.org/search?sea...209.216.178.77 Well, well, well. There you go then. I'm a real poster. With all the mined data showing. As well as ... ... shows my ISP, their addy, and MY IP number. ALINA IS NOT a real person. Or "she" someone that feels a need to show up suddenly with a nearly zero posting history (at the time.....my you have been working hard) a Spanish speaker, asking for information about the Embry report...but oddly not caring enough to follow through when YOU required her to send an envelope. Doan, you don't really think I'm stupid. You just keep screaming it hoping I am. R R R R R R R RR R RR No, BOY, you are the stupid one if you think anyone here outside of those that want to be fooled because they ARE fools, believes your bull****. Have a nice day. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
KANE IS STUPID! DOAN'S A PHONY.DOAN'S A PHONY.DOAN'S A PHONY.
Doan wrote:
More STUPIDITY EXPOSED by Kane. Is that sweat I see beaded on your little monkeyboy forehead? R R R R R R RR R Doan On Wed, 28 Feb 2007, 0:- wrote: Doan wrote: On Tue, 27 Feb 2007, Doan wrote: Man! Your STUPIDITY never ceases to amaze me. Doan On Tue, 27 Feb 2007, 0:- wrote: 0:- wrote: This one's just for you and I, Doan, as I doubt anyone here understands the significance of this source for proving that an IP is not a REAL poster's IP but a fake, made up, used by the commercial vendor as an internal code, showing in the log, triggering automatically to then forwarding mail to the subscriber to the anonymizing service who that fake number has been assigned to. http://www.senderbase.org/search?sea...48.233.119.168 Yes, it's "Senderbase," that will tell you if an IP number has traffic. If it does have "traffic," it's a real assigned IP number. If not...OOOooooOOOOOoooo....it's a fake...a proxie. So let us look, shall we then? Report on IP address: 148.233.119.168 Volume Statistics for this IP Magnitude Vol Change vs. Average Last day 0.0 -100% Last 30 days 0.0 -100% Average 0.0 Third-party Certification Sender Score Certified? Not Certified TRUSTe Privacy Seal? Not Certified Information from whois Please wait...loading data... Other information about this IP address Sender Category unknown Network Owner unknown Domain unknown Date of first message seen from this address CIDR range unknown # of domains controlled by this network owner 0 Geography data Country unknown State unknown City unknown Postal code unknown Related links Google groups http://groups.google.com/groups?scor...+group:*abuse* SpamCop http://spamcop.net/w3m?action=checkb...48.233.119.168 Real-time blacklists [ Click to view all ] dynablock.njabl.org Dynamic IP - http://www.njabl.org/cgi-bin/lookup....48.233.119.168 No address list shown since no email was detected from 148.233.119.0/24. ... It seems as though a certain RANGE of IP numbers are NOT real IP numbers at all...fancy that, eh? UnhOh, Doan. UnhOOOOh. Dear me. No such poster, by IP, exists, at least according to this. So, Kane. Let's just do a lookup using your friend's IP address shall we: (Hey, Ron. My apology for using you to EXPOSE Kane's STUPIDITY. I know it hurts since you have so much RESPECT for him. Hihihi!) Report on IP address: 68.13.85.158 Volume Statistics for this IP Magnitude Vol Change vs. Average Last day 0.0 -100% Last 30 days 0.0 -100% Average 0.0 Third-party Certification Sender Score Certified? Not Certified TRUSTe Privacy Seal? Not Certified Information from whois Please wait...loading data... Other information about this IP address Sender Category unknown Network Owner unknown Domain unknown Date of first message seen from this address CIDR range unknown # of domains controlled by this network owner 0 Geography data Country unknown State unknown City unknown Postal code unknown Related links Google groups http://groups.google.com/groups?scor...+group:*abuse* SpamCop http://spamcop.net/w3m?action=checkb...p=68.13.85.158 Real-time blacklists [ Click to view all ] dynablock.njabl.org Dynamic IP - http://www.njabl.org/cgi-bin/lookup....y=68.13.85.158 No address list shown since no email was detected from 68.13.85.0/24. That's right. Uh oh! Kane! Using your logic, I just PROVED that Ron is me! Hihihi! No you didn't. You proved that Ron doesn't or didn't for 30 days, or the last one day, use that account for EMAIL, stupid. Hahaha! That is not the case, STUPID! YOU ARE STUPID, Kane! YOU ARE STUPID, Kane! YOU ARE STUPID, Kane! Yeah, repeat that four more times for Doan. YOU ARE STUPID, Kane! YOU ARE STUPID, Kane! YOU ARE STUPID!, Kane! This isn't a 'Usenet' posting tracker, stupid. This is a "Usenet" group, STUPID! Learn to READ. STOP Making a fool of yourself! It's "The Leading Global Email Traffic Monitoring Network" See that word in the middle? The reason I used 'Alina's' addy, and MY OWN, is because I am quite sure I've used mine for Email, and I received an email from "Alina" within the last 30 days.......Alina. Really? And your proof is? Did she tell you that she was me??? Hihihi! And yet EMAIL traffic logging did not detect it. And how does one log email traffic not directed to them, Kane? YOU ARE STUPID! That's because the NUMBER WAS NOT ASSIGNED ... AND IS FICTITIOUS. WHAT THE **** ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT??? Unassigned numbers are not logged by this service. Run that by me again. You know that, Doan. Did you run my number? What did you get, Doan? I got a full bore LOGGING of recent traffic. Or are you going to pretend this service would log ALL IP numbers as blanks as you found a few of? Maybe our friends are using an anonymizer, or maybe no """"EMAIL"""" HAS BEEN SENT, BUT FOR MY OWN NUMBER WE GET: Report on IP address: 209.216.178.77 Volume Statistics for this IP Magnitude Vol Change vs. Average Last day 0.0 -100% Last 30 days 0.0 -100% It said nothing within the past 30 days, Kane! YOU ARE STUPID! Learn to read Kane! YOU ARE STUPID! Average 0.0 Third-party Certification Sender Score Certified? Not Certified TRUSTe Privacy Seal? Not Certified Information from whois Please wait...loading data... Other information about this IP address Sender Category Network Owner Gorge Networks Domain gorge.net Date of first message seen from this address 2007-01-28 CIDR range 209.216.160.0/19 # of domains controlled by this network owner 62 Geography data Country US State OR City Hood River Postal code 97031 Related links Google groups http://groups.google.com/groups?scor...+group:*abuse* SpamCop http://spamcop.net/w3m?action=checkb...209.216.178.77 Real-time blacklists [ Click to view all ] not in any blacklists .... You don't know how to read, stupid, and you are stupider on covering your ass and the miss the details. Note that the service WE just used picks up activity for 30 days. So your activity is 0.0 in the last 30 days? ARE YOU THIS STUPID? Note that it only covers EMAIL traffic. Note that it does not track fictitious IP numbers....it can't. Note the I got email from YOU, Alina, within the last 30 days. So? Did you get permission from Alina to post her private email in a public forum? I wrote "Alina" to provoke you into a response, stupid little monkeyboy. And sure enough YOU, Alina, responded, and I immediately ran a check to see if 'her' IP was real or fictitious.....Here's YOUR post to me Doan, with all the elaborate created websites and other bull**** you've exercised yourself to create for the sole purpose of LYING. " from Alina Madrid hide details Feb 13 to Pohaku Kane date Feb 13, 2007 9:31 AM subject Can Kane provide Jerry with the Embry study? mailed-by et.com.mx Kane, My name is Alina, not Aline. I live in Guadalajara, Jalisco, M?xico. I do not know Doan nor Aline any more than I do you. I left the usenet and don't mean to return. I followed a spammer into a web based board. I run one such board with her now. It's for moms only, but you can take a look at it: http://mommiesnbabies.com . Do a whois and you will see it's hosted in Mexico (*I* host it). Maybe you can see I'm an admin there too. I have a question, tho. Why did you email me? Doan did so too not long ago. I replied once, he replied in turn, and that was it. " That is a PROOF that Alina is not me, Kane! Are you SO STUPID? Also she didn't mention anything about the copy of the Embry Study you claimed she asked for and you sent her. Why is that? Now notice, Doan ALINA, Alina pulls a bluff. YOU, Doan, the stupid monkeyboy. The one who EXPOSING his STUPIDITY in public is YOU, Kane! 'Alina' invites me to do a Whois, with a "maybe you can see I'm an admin there too." Well, Doan, YOU could have joined that group as "Alina." I notice also, that when 'Alina' 'answered' my post to her, she responded with the word in her post, "M?xico." Doan, YOU looked up 'Guadalajara,' to get its more precise location in an attempt to better establish credibility but then COPIED AND PASTED IT. That's why the "?" with the accent mark in "M?xico" showed up. 'Alina' in other posts, didn't key in 'Mexico' that way, and 'she' would not need to look up Jalisco to respond. YOU did it. AND YOU SCREWED UP.....while it's "hosted" in Mexico, that can be done anytime from anyplace. It's where it is OWNED that matters. You simply joined this group as 'Alina.' Whois result: Registrant: Gina Turner 1217 Treetop Court Toledo, Ohio 43615 United States Registered through: GoDaddy.com, Inc. (http://www.godaddy.com) Domain Name: MOMMIESNBABIES.COM Created on: 27-Jan-05 Expires on: 27-Jan-10 Last Updated on: 28-Jan-07 Administrative Contact: T, Gina 1217 Treetop Court Toledo, Ohio 43615 United States +1.1111111 Technical Contact: TechContact, YahooDomains 701 First Ave. Sunnyvale, California 94089 United States +1.6198813096 Domain servers in listed order: LARGO.ET.COM.MX NS7.ZONEEDIT.COM NS12.ZONEEDIT.COM ... Doesn't have my name there anywhere, Kane? The Domain is being "hosted" in Mexico...that doesn't stop YOU from joining up when the heat went on last year when I started questioning you about Alina and why so little posting traffic from "her." Hell, you might have joined up clear back when you created Alina out of Sister Aline who resides in Mahonia Mansion from USC, a former Spanish language instructor. Want to read all my comments and "Alina's" responses, or do you KNOW them already, Alina? Yer a phony, Doan/Alina You created her when I challenged you to find someone that wanted Your copy of the Embry study (which you did not have then because USC library didn't have it at the time and you had to order it, nor did AAA send it out any more (until I requested they reactivate it, you stupid git). What next, Doan...claim I'M 'Alina?' DOAN'S A PHONY. DOAN'S A PHONY. DOAN'S A PHONY. DOAN'S A PHONY. DOAN'S A PHONY. DOAN'S A PHONY. DOAN'S A PHONY. DOAN'S A PHONY. DOAN'S A PHONY. DOAN'S A PHONY. DOAN'S A PHONY. DOAN'S A PHONY. DOAN'S A PHONY. DOAN'S A PHONY. DOAN'S A PHONY. Hihihi! Looked like you live up to your name as a STUPID liar, Kane! And you always will be until you get over your parents betrayal of you when you were little. hahaha! It's what makes you have to be "clever," even if it means lying. And risking getting caught at it. Will you now just work harder to cleverly cover your lies, or will you grow up. Hahaha! Doan 0:] Doan But just to check.....R R RR R R R R ... Let's DO check my IP number like YOU suggested and see if I'm posting from a fake IP. 209.216.178.77 http://www.senderbase.org/search?sea...209.216.178.77 Well, well, well. There you go then. I'm a real poster. With all the mined data showing. As well as ... ... shows my ISP, their addy, and MY IP number. ALINA IS NOT a real person. Or "she" someone that feels a need to show up suddenly with a nearly zero posting history (at the time.....my you have been working hard) a Spanish speaker, asking for information about the Embry report...but oddly not caring enough to follow through when YOU required her to send an envelope. Doan, you don't really think I'm stupid. You just keep screaming it hoping I am. R R R R R R R RR R RR No, BOY, you are the stupid one if you think anyone here outside of those that want to be fooled because they ARE fools, believes your bull****. Have a nice day. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Just for those that understand IP addy generation... Check'Alina's' IP address yourself.
Doan wrote:
YUP! And he is making a fool of himself in public without even knowing it. What a ignoranus! What a lot of sweat. And what a need for help so bad you'd go to a troll. R R R R R R R RR No, Doan: YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. Doan On Wed, 28 Feb 2007, Condoleezza HaHa wrote: 0:- wrote: Don - you are hilarious in addition to being clueless. Web Developer - hahahahahahahahahahaha Well, at least it got you access to the kiddies. 0:- wrote: This one's just for you and I, Doan, as I doubt anyone here understands the significance of this source for proving that an IP is not a REAL poster's IP but a fake, made up, used by the commercial vendor as an internal code, showing in the log, triggering automatically to then forwarding mail to the subscriber to the anonymizing service who that fake number has been assigned to. http://www.senderbase.org/search?sea...48.233.119.168 Yes, it's "Senderbase," that will tell you if an IP number has traffic. If it does have "traffic," it's a real assigned IP number. If not...OOOooooOOOOOoooo....it's a fake...a proxie. So let us look, shall we then? Report on IP address: 148.233.119.168 Volume Statistics for this IP Magnitude Vol Change vs. Average Last day 0.0 -100% Last 30 days 0.0 -100% Average 0.0 Third-party Certification Sender Score Certified? Not Certified TRUSTe Privacy Seal? Not Certified Information from whois Please wait...loading data... Other information about this IP address Sender Category unknown Network Owner unknown Domain unknown Date of first message seen from this address CIDR range unknown # of domains controlled by this network owner 0 Geography data Country unknown State unknown City unknown Postal code unknown Related links Google groups http://groups.google.com/groups?scor...+group:*abuse* SpamCop http://spamcop.net/w3m?action=checkb...48.233.119.168 Real-time blacklists [ Click to view all ] dynablock.njabl.org Dynamic IP - http://www.njabl.org/cgi-bin/lookup....48.233.119.168 No address list shown since no email was detected from 148.233.119.0/24. ... It seems as though a certain RANGE of IP numbers are NOT real IP numbers at all...fancy that, eh? UnhOh, Doan. UnhOOOOh. Dear me. No such poster, by IP, exists, at least according to this. But just to check.....R R RR R R R R ... Let's DO check my IP number like YOU suggested and see if I'm posting from a fake IP. 209.216.178.77 http://www.senderbase.org/search?sea...209.216.178.77 Well, well, well. There you go then. I'm a real poster. With all the mined data showing. As well as ... ... shows my ISP, their addy, and MY IP number. ALINA IS NOT a real person. Or "she" someone that feels a need to show up suddenly with a nearly zero posting history (at the time.....my you have been working hard) a Spanish speaker, asking for information about the Embry report...but oddly not caring enough to follow through when YOU required her to send an envelope. Doan, you don't really think I'm stupid. You just keep screaming it hoping I am. R R R R R R R RR R RR No, BOY, you are the stupid one if you think anyone here outside of those that want to be fooled because they ARE fools, believes your bull****. Have a nice day. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Just for those that understand IP addy generation... Check'Alina's' IP address yourself.
Kane! YOU ARE A STUPID LIAR! Hihihi!
Doan On Wed, 28 Feb 2007, 0:- wrote: Doan wrote: YUP! And he is making a fool of himself in public without even knowing it. What a ignoranus! What a lot of sweat. And what a need for help so bad you'd go to a troll. R R R R R R R RR No, Doan: YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. Doan On Wed, 28 Feb 2007, Condoleezza HaHa wrote: 0:- wrote: Don - you are hilarious in addition to being clueless. Web Developer - hahahahahahahahahahaha Well, at least it got you access to the kiddies. 0:- wrote: This one's just for you and I, Doan, as I doubt anyone here understands the significance of this source for proving that an IP is not a REAL poster's IP but a fake, made up, used by the commercial vendor as an internal code, showing in the log, triggering automatically to then forwarding mail to the subscriber to the anonymizing service who that fake number has been assigned to. http://www.senderbase.org/search?sea...48.233.119.168 Yes, it's "Senderbase," that will tell you if an IP number has traffic. If it does have "traffic," it's a real assigned IP number. If not...OOOooooOOOOOoooo....it's a fake...a proxie. So let us look, shall we then? Report on IP address: 148.233.119.168 Volume Statistics for this IP Magnitude Vol Change vs. Average Last day 0.0 -100% Last 30 days 0.0 -100% Average 0.0 Third-party Certification Sender Score Certified? Not Certified TRUSTe Privacy Seal? Not Certified Information from whois Please wait...loading data... Other information about this IP address Sender Category unknown Network Owner unknown Domain unknown Date of first message seen from this address CIDR range unknown # of domains controlled by this network owner 0 Geography data Country unknown State unknown City unknown Postal code unknown Related links Google groups http://groups.google.com/groups?scor...+group:*abuse* SpamCop http://spamcop.net/w3m?action=checkb...48.233.119.168 Real-time blacklists [ Click to view all ] dynablock.njabl.org Dynamic IP - http://www.njabl.org/cgi-bin/lookup....48.233.119.168 No address list shown since no email was detected from 148.233.119.0/24. ... It seems as though a certain RANGE of IP numbers are NOT real IP numbers at all...fancy that, eh? UnhOh, Doan. UnhOOOOh. Dear me. No such poster, by IP, exists, at least according to this. But just to check.....R R RR R R R R ... Let's DO check my IP number like YOU suggested and see if I'm posting from a fake IP. 209.216.178.77 http://www.senderbase.org/search?sea...209.216.178.77 Well, well, well. There you go then. I'm a real poster. With all the mined data showing. As well as ... ... shows my ISP, their addy, and MY IP number. ALINA IS NOT a real person. Or "she" someone that feels a need to show up suddenly with a nearly zero posting history (at the time.....my you have been working hard) a Spanish speaker, asking for information about the Embry report...but oddly not caring enough to follow through when YOU required her to send an envelope. Doan, you don't really think I'm stupid. You just keep screaming it hoping I am. R R R R R R R RR R RR No, BOY, you are the stupid one if you think anyone here outside of those that want to be fooled because they ARE fools, believes your bull****. Have a nice day. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Just for those that understand IP addy generation... Check'Alina's' IP address yourself.
Kane is STUPID! Doan On Wed, 28 Feb 2007, 0:- wrote: Doan wrote: YUP! And he is making a fool of himself in public without even knowing it. What a ignoranus! What a lot of sweat. And what a need for help so bad you'd go to a troll. R R R R R R R RR No, Doan: YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. YOU ARE DOAN, A PHONY. Doan On Wed, 28 Feb 2007, Condoleezza HaHa wrote: 0:- wrote: Don - you are hilarious in addition to being clueless. Web Developer - hahahahahahahahahahaha Well, at least it got you access to the kiddies. 0:- wrote: This one's just for you and I, Doan, as I doubt anyone here understands the significance of this source for proving that an IP is not a REAL poster's IP but a fake, made up, used by the commercial vendor as an internal code, showing in the log, triggering automatically to then forwarding mail to the subscriber to the anonymizing service who that fake number has been assigned to. http://www.senderbase.org/search?sea...48.233.119.168 Yes, it's "Senderbase," that will tell you if an IP number has traffic. If it does have "traffic," it's a real assigned IP number. If not...OOOooooOOOOOoooo....it's a fake...a proxie. So let us look, shall we then? Report on IP address: 148.233.119.168 Volume Statistics for this IP Magnitude Vol Change vs. Average Last day 0.0 -100% Last 30 days 0.0 -100% Average 0.0 Third-party Certification Sender Score Certified? Not Certified TRUSTe Privacy Seal? Not Certified Information from whois Please wait...loading data... Other information about this IP address Sender Category unknown Network Owner unknown Domain unknown Date of first message seen from this address CIDR range unknown # of domains controlled by this network owner 0 Geography data Country unknown State unknown City unknown Postal code unknown Related links Google groups http://groups.google.com/groups?scor...+group:*abuse* SpamCop http://spamcop.net/w3m?action=checkb...48.233.119.168 Real-time blacklists [ Click to view all ] dynablock.njabl.org Dynamic IP - http://www.njabl.org/cgi-bin/lookup....48.233.119.168 No address list shown since no email was detected from 148.233.119.0/24. ... It seems as though a certain RANGE of IP numbers are NOT real IP numbers at all...fancy that, eh? UnhOh, Doan. UnhOOOOh. Dear me. No such poster, by IP, exists, at least according to this. But just to check.....R R RR R R R R ... Let's DO check my IP number like YOU suggested and see if I'm posting from a fake IP. 209.216.178.77 http://www.senderbase.org/search?sea...209.216.178.77 Well, well, well. There you go then. I'm a real poster. With all the mined data showing. As well as ... ... shows my ISP, their addy, and MY IP number. ALINA IS NOT a real person. Or "she" someone that feels a need to show up suddenly with a nearly zero posting history (at the time.....my you have been working hard) a Spanish speaker, asking for information about the Embry report...but oddly not caring enough to follow through when YOU required her to send an envelope. Doan, you don't really think I'm stupid. You just keep screaming it hoping I am. R R R R R R R RR R RR No, BOY, you are the stupid one if you think anyone here outside of those that want to be fooled because they ARE fools, believes your bull****. Have a nice day. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
KANE IS STUPID! DOAN'S A PHONY.DOAN'S A PHONY.DOAN'S A
Report on IP address: 209.216.178.77 Volume Statistics for this IP Magnitude Vol Change vs. Average Last day 0.0 -100% Last 30 days 0.0 -100% Average 0.0 No email activity from you within the last 30 days, Kane? YOUR STUPIDITY is EXPOSED once again. Hihihi! Doan On Wed, 28 Feb 2007, 0:- wrote: Doan wrote: More STUPIDITY EXPOSED by Kane. Is that sweat I see beaded on your little monkeyboy forehead? R R R R R R RR R Doan On Wed, 28 Feb 2007, 0:- wrote: Doan wrote: On Tue, 27 Feb 2007, Doan wrote: Man! Your STUPIDITY never ceases to amaze me. Doan On Tue, 27 Feb 2007, 0:- wrote: 0:- wrote: This one's just for you and I, Doan, as I doubt anyone here understands the significance of this source for proving that an IP is not a REAL poster's IP but a fake, made up, used by the commercial vendor as an internal code, showing in the log, triggering automatically to then forwarding mail to the subscriber to the anonymizing service who that fake number has been assigned to. http://www.senderbase.org/search?sea...48.233.119.168 Yes, it's "Senderbase," that will tell you if an IP number has traffic. If it does have "traffic," it's a real assigned IP number. If not...OOOooooOOOOOoooo....it's a fake...a proxie. So let us look, shall we then? Report on IP address: 148.233.119.168 Volume Statistics for this IP Magnitude Vol Change vs. Average Last day 0.0 -100% Last 30 days 0.0 -100% Average 0.0 Third-party Certification Sender Score Certified? Not Certified TRUSTe Privacy Seal? Not Certified Information from whois Please wait...loading data... Other information about this IP address Sender Category unknown Network Owner unknown Domain unknown Date of first message seen from this address CIDR range unknown # of domains controlled by this network owner 0 Geography data Country unknown State unknown City unknown Postal code unknown Related links Google groups http://groups.google.com/groups?scor...+group:*abuse* SpamCop http://spamcop.net/w3m?action=checkb...48.233.119.168 Real-time blacklists [ Click to view all ] dynablock.njabl.org Dynamic IP - http://www.njabl.org/cgi-bin/lookup....48.233.119.168 No address list shown since no email was detected from 148.233.119.0/24. ... It seems as though a certain RANGE of IP numbers are NOT real IP numbers at all...fancy that, eh? UnhOh, Doan. UnhOOOOh. Dear me. No such poster, by IP, exists, at least according to this. So, Kane. Let's just do a lookup using your friend's IP address shall we: (Hey, Ron. My apology for using you to EXPOSE Kane's STUPIDITY. I know it hurts since you have so much RESPECT for him. Hihihi!) Report on IP address: 68.13.85.158 Volume Statistics for this IP Magnitude Vol Change vs. Average Last day 0.0 -100% Last 30 days 0.0 -100% Average 0.0 Third-party Certification Sender Score Certified? Not Certified TRUSTe Privacy Seal? Not Certified Information from whois Please wait...loading data... Other information about this IP address Sender Category unknown Network Owner unknown Domain unknown Date of first message seen from this address CIDR range unknown # of domains controlled by this network owner 0 Geography data Country unknown State unknown City unknown Postal code unknown Related links Google groups http://groups.google.com/groups?scor...+group:*abuse* SpamCop http://spamcop.net/w3m?action=checkb...p=68.13.85.158 Real-time blacklists [ Click to view all ] dynablock.njabl.org Dynamic IP - http://www.njabl.org/cgi-bin/lookup....y=68.13.85.158 No address list shown since no email was detected from 68.13.85.0/24. That's right. Uh oh! Kane! Using your logic, I just PROVED that Ron is me! Hihihi! No you didn't. You proved that Ron doesn't or didn't for 30 days, or the last one day, use that account for EMAIL, stupid. Hahaha! That is not the case, STUPID! YOU ARE STUPID, Kane! YOU ARE STUPID, Kane! YOU ARE STUPID, Kane! Yeah, repeat that four more times for Doan. YOU ARE STUPID, Kane! YOU ARE STUPID, Kane! YOU ARE STUPID!, Kane! This isn't a 'Usenet' posting tracker, stupid. This is a "Usenet" group, STUPID! Learn to READ. STOP Making a fool of yourself! It's "The Leading Global Email Traffic Monitoring Network" See that word in the middle? The reason I used 'Alina's' addy, and MY OWN, is because I am quite sure I've used mine for Email, and I received an email from "Alina" within the last 30 days.......Alina. Really? And your proof is? Did she tell you that she was me??? Hihihi! And yet EMAIL traffic logging did not detect it. And how does one log email traffic not directed to them, Kane? YOU ARE STUPID! That's because the NUMBER WAS NOT ASSIGNED ... AND IS FICTITIOUS. WHAT THE **** ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT??? Unassigned numbers are not logged by this service. Run that by me again. You know that, Doan. Did you run my number? What did you get, Doan? I got a full bore LOGGING of recent traffic. Or are you going to pretend this service would log ALL IP numbers as blanks as you found a few of? Maybe our friends are using an anonymizer, or maybe no """"EMAIL"""" HAS BEEN SENT, BUT FOR MY OWN NUMBER WE GET: Report on IP address: 209.216.178.77 Volume Statistics for this IP Magnitude Vol Change vs. Average Last day 0.0 -100% Last 30 days 0.0 -100% It said nothing within the past 30 days, Kane! YOU ARE STUPID! Learn to read Kane! YOU ARE STUPID! Average 0.0 Third-party Certification Sender Score Certified? Not Certified TRUSTe Privacy Seal? Not Certified Information from whois Please wait...loading data... Other information about this IP address Sender Category Network Owner Gorge Networks Domain gorge.net Date of first message seen from this address 2007-01-28 CIDR range 209.216.160.0/19 # of domains controlled by this network owner 62 Geography data Country US State OR City Hood River Postal code 97031 Related links Google groups http://groups.google.com/groups?scor...+group:*abuse* SpamCop http://spamcop.net/w3m?action=checkb...209.216.178.77 Real-time blacklists [ Click to view all ] not in any blacklists .... You don't know how to read, stupid, and you are stupider on covering your ass and the miss the details. Note that the service WE just used picks up activity for 30 days. So your activity is 0.0 in the last 30 days? ARE YOU THIS STUPID? Note that it only covers EMAIL traffic. Note that it does not track fictitious IP numbers....it can't. Note the I got email from YOU, Alina, within the last 30 days. So? Did you get permission from Alina to post her private email in a public forum? I wrote "Alina" to provoke you into a response, stupid little monkeyboy. And sure enough YOU, Alina, responded, and I immediately ran a check to see if 'her' IP was real or fictitious.....Here's YOUR post to me Doan, with all the elaborate created websites and other bull**** you've exercised yourself to create for the sole purpose of LYING. " from Alina Madrid hide details Feb 13 to Pohaku Kane date Feb 13, 2007 9:31 AM subject Can Kane provide Jerry with the Embry study? mailed-by et.com.mx Kane, My name is Alina, not Aline. I live in Guadalajara, Jalisco, M?xico. I do not know Doan nor Aline any more than I do you. I left the usenet and don't mean to return. I followed a spammer into a web based board. I run one such board with her now. It's for moms only, but you can take a look at it: http://mommiesnbabies.com . Do a whois and you will see it's hosted in Mexico (*I* host it). Maybe you can see I'm an admin there too. I have a question, tho. Why did you email me? Doan did so too not long ago. I replied once, he replied in turn, and that was it. " That is a PROOF that Alina is not me, Kane! Are you SO STUPID? Also she didn't mention anything about the copy of the Embry Study you claimed she asked for and you sent her. Why is that? Now notice, Doan ALINA, Alina pulls a bluff. YOU, Doan, the stupid monkeyboy. The one who EXPOSING his STUPIDITY in public is YOU, Kane! 'Alina' invites me to do a Whois, with a "maybe you can see I'm an admin there too." Well, Doan, YOU could have joined that group as "Alina." I notice also, that when 'Alina' 'answered' my post to her, she responded with the word in her post, "M?xico." Doan, YOU looked up 'Guadalajara,' to get its more precise location in an attempt to better establish credibility but then COPIED AND PASTED IT. That's why the "?" with the accent mark in "M?xico" showed up. 'Alina' in other posts, didn't key in 'Mexico' that way, and 'she' would not need to look up Jalisco to respond. YOU did it. AND YOU SCREWED UP.....while it's "hosted" in Mexico, that can be done anytime from anyplace. It's where it is OWNED that matters. You simply joined this group as 'Alina.' Whois result: Registrant: Gina Turner 1217 Treetop Court Toledo, Ohio 43615 United States Registered through: GoDaddy.com, Inc. (http://www.godaddy.com) Domain Name: MOMMIESNBABIES.COM Created on: 27-Jan-05 Expires on: 27-Jan-10 Last Updated on: 28-Jan-07 Administrative Contact: T, Gina 1217 Treetop Court Toledo, Ohio 43615 United States +1.1111111 Technical Contact: TechContact, YahooDomains 701 First Ave. Sunnyvale, California 94089 United States +1.6198813096 Domain servers in listed order: LARGO.ET.COM.MX NS7.ZONEEDIT.COM NS12.ZONEEDIT.COM ... Doesn't have my name there anywhere, Kane? The Domain is being "hosted" in Mexico...that doesn't stop YOU from joining up when the heat went on last year when I started questioning you about Alina and why so little posting traffic from "her." Hell, you might have joined up clear back when you created Alina out of Sister Aline who resides in Mahonia Mansion from USC, a former Spanish language instructor. Want to read all my comments and "Alina's" responses, or do you KNOW them already, Alina? Yer a phony, Doan/Alina You created her when I challenged you to find someone that wanted Your copy of the Embry study (which you did not have then because USC library didn't have it at the time and you had to order it, nor did AAA send it out any more (until I requested they reactivate it, you stupid git). What next, Doan...claim I'M 'Alina?' DOAN'S A PHONY. DOAN'S A PHONY. DOAN'S A PHONY. DOAN'S A PHONY. DOAN'S A PHONY. DOAN'S A PHONY. DOAN'S A PHONY. DOAN'S A PHONY. DOAN'S A PHONY. DOAN'S A PHONY. DOAN'S A PHONY. DOAN'S A PHONY. DOAN'S A PHONY. DOAN'S A PHONY. DOAN'S A PHONY. Hihihi! Looked like you live up to your name as a STUPID liar, Kane! And you always will be until you get over your parents betrayal of you when you were little. hahaha! It's what makes you have to be "clever," even if it means lying. And risking getting caught at it. Will you now just work harder to cleverly cover your lies, or will you grow up. Hahaha! Doan 0:] Doan But just to check.....R R RR R R R R ... Let's DO check my IP number like YOU suggested and see if I'm posting from a fake IP. 209.216.178.77 http://www.senderbase.org/search?sea...209.216.178.77 Well, well, well. There you go then. I'm a real poster. With all the mined data showing. As well as ... ... shows my ISP, their addy, and MY IP number. ALINA IS NOT a real person. Or "she" someone that feels a need to show up suddenly with a nearly zero posting history (at the time.....my you have been working hard) a Spanish speaker, asking for information about the Embry report...but oddly not caring enough to follow through when YOU required her to send an envelope. Doan, you don't really think I'm stupid. You just keep screaming it hoping I am. R R R R R R R RR R RR No, BOY, you are the stupid one if you think anyone here outside of those that want to be fooled because they ARE fools, believes your bull****. Have a nice day. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Kane EXPOSING his STUPIDITY to the public Check 'Alina's' IPaddress yourself.
Here is the result from your own IP address, Kane: Please enter proxy IP address and port Proxy IP: 209.216.178.77 Anonymous - HTTP Proxy server does not send HTTP_X_FORWARDED_FOR variable to host, this improves privacy since your IP address cannot be logged. High anonymity - HTTP Servers of this type don't send HTTP_X_FORWARDED_FOR, HTTP_VIA and HTTP_PROXY_CONNECTION variables. Host doesn't even know you are using proxy server an of course it doesn't know your IP address. Hihihi! YOU ARE STUPID, Kane!!! Doan On 27 Feb 2007, 0:- wrote: http://www.atomintersoft.com/product...r/default.aspx When the site page opens, you only need the IP addy Below. Feel free to check any of "Alina's" posts to varify that I have provided 'her' IP addy. Go to the end of the page for the entry fields. Enjoy. "Please enter proxy IP address and port Proxy IP: ( NNTP-Posting-Host 148.233.119.168 RESULTS OF IP ADDY CHECK FROM ALINA'S POSTS: Anonymous - HTTP Proxy server does not send HTTP_X_FORWARDED_FOR variable to host, this improves privacy since your IP address cannot be logged. High anonymity - HTTP Servers of this type don't send HTTP_X_FORWARDED_FOR, HTTP_VIA and HTTP_PROXY_CONNECTION variables. Host doesn't even know you are using proxy server an of course it doesn't know your IP address." |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Kane EXPOSING his STUPIDITY to the public Check 'Alina's' IPaddress yourself.
No respose from you, Kane? Hihihi! Doan On Wed, 28 Feb 2007, Doan wrote: Here is the result from your own IP address, Kane: Please enter proxy IP address and port Proxy IP: 209.216.178.77 Anonymous - HTTP Proxy server does not send HTTP_X_FORWARDED_FOR variable to host, this improves privacy since your IP address cannot be logged. High anonymity - HTTP Servers of this type don't send HTTP_X_FORWARDED_FOR, HTTP_VIA and HTTP_PROXY_CONNECTION variables. Host doesn't even know you are using proxy server an of course it doesn't know your IP address. Hihihi! YOU ARE STUPID, Kane!!! Doan On 27 Feb 2007, 0:- wrote: http://www.atomintersoft.com/product...r/default.aspx When the site page opens, you only need the IP addy Below. Feel free to check any of "Alina's" posts to varify that I have provided 'her' IP addy. Go to the end of the page for the entry fields. Enjoy. "Please enter proxy IP address and port Proxy IP: ( NNTP-Posting-Host 148.233.119.168 RESULTS OF IP ADDY CHECK FROM ALINA'S POSTS: Anonymous - HTTP Proxy server does not send HTTP_X_FORWARDED_FOR variable to host, this improves privacy since your IP address cannot be logged. High anonymity - HTTP Servers of this type don't send HTTP_X_FORWARDED_FOR, HTTP_VIA and HTTP_PROXY_CONNECTION variables. Host doesn't even know you are using proxy server an of course it doesn't know your IP address." |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Kane EXPOSING his STUPIDITY to the public Check 'Alina's' IP address yourself.
On Feb 28, 10:51 pm, Doan wrote:
No respose from you, Kane? Hihihi! Doan On Wed, 28 Feb 2007, Doan wrote: Here is the result from your own IP address, Kane: Please enter proxy IP address and port Proxy IP: 209.216.178.77 Did. Got back my ISP IP number provider. Put in Alina's and got back NO provider. Hence, a fictitious IP. You are one back on the progress here, Doan. I posted this below for two reasons. One to get you to bit, and two, for education about the existence of high anonymity proxy servers. Everyone knows now what you and I know. That Alina either is threatened so, before she joined this asp to chat with you....R R R R ....that she maintained a high level anonymous proxy account, or it was YOU. Personally I believe there is an Alina at a mom'sgroup, but I don't believe for a moment that's our Alina. Or if it is, she's a buddy of yours that did a little heavy hauling when I caught you lying about the Embry report. Keep smilin' kiddo, it's all yah got. Yer a phony Anonymous - HTTP Proxy server does not send HTTP_X_FORWARDED_FOR variable to host, this improves privacy since your IP address cannot be logged. High anonymity - HTTP Servers of this type don't send HTTP_X_FORWARDED_FOR, HTTP_VIA and HTTP_PROXY_CONNECTION variables. Host doesn't even know you are using proxy server an of course it doesn't know your IP address. Hihihi! YOU ARE STUPID, Kane!!! Doan On 27 Feb 2007, 0:- wrote: http://www.atomintersoft.com/product...e-proxy-checke... When the site page opens, you only need the IP addy Below. Feel free to check any of "Alina's" posts to varify that I have provided 'her' IP addy. Go to the end of the page for the entry fields. Enjoy. "Please enter proxy IP address and port Proxy IP: ( NNTP-Posting-Host 148.233.119.168 RESULTS OF IP ADDY CHECK FROM ALINA'S POSTS: Anonymous - HTTP Proxy server does not send HTTP_X_FORWARDED_FOR variable to host, this improves privacy since your IP address cannot be logged. High anonymity - HTTP Servers of this type don't send HTTP_X_FORWARDED_FOR, HTTP_VIA and HTTP_PROXY_CONNECTION variables. Host doesn't even know you are using proxy server an of course it doesn't know your IP address." |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Kane EXPOSING his STUPIDITY to the public Check 'Alina's' IPaddress yourself.
On 1 Mar 2007, 0:- wrote:
On Feb 28, 10:51 pm, Doan wrote: No respose from you, Kane? Hihihi! Doan On Wed, 28 Feb 2007, Doan wrote: Here is the result from your own IP address, Kane: Please enter proxy IP address and port Proxy IP: 209.216.178.77 Did. Got back my ISP IP number provider. Nope. You are lying STUPIDLY again! ;-) Put in Alina's and got back NO provider. Hence, a fictitious IP. You are one back on the progress here, Doan. I posted this below for two reasons. One to get you to bit, and two, for education about the existence of high anonymity proxy servers. Hahaha! And the NUMBER ONE reason is... YOU ARE STUPID! Doan Everyone knows now what you and I know. That Alina either is threatened so, before she joined this asp to chat with you....R R R R ....that she maintained a high level anonymous proxy account, or it was YOU. Personally I believe there is an Alina at a mom'sgroup, but I don't believe for a moment that's our Alina. Or if it is, she's a buddy of yours that did a little heavy hauling when I caught you lying about the Embry report. Keep smilin' kiddo, it's all yah got. Yer a phony Anonymous - HTTP Proxy server does not send HTTP_X_FORWARDED_FOR variable to host, this improves privacy since your IP address cannot be logged. High anonymity - HTTP Servers of this type don't send HTTP_X_FORWARDED_FOR, HTTP_VIA and HTTP_PROXY_CONNECTION variables. Host doesn't even know you are using proxy server an of course it doesn't know your IP address. Hihihi! YOU ARE STUPID, Kane!!! Doan On 27 Feb 2007, 0:- wrote: http://www.atomintersoft.com/product...e-proxy-checke... When the site page opens, you only need the IP addy Below. Feel free to check any of "Alina's" posts to varify that I have provided 'her' IP addy. Go to the end of the page for the entry fields. Enjoy. "Please enter proxy IP address and port Proxy IP: ( NNTP-Posting-Host 148.233.119.168 RESULTS OF IP ADDY CHECK FROM ALINA'S POSTS: Anonymous - HTTP Proxy server does not send HTTP_X_FORWARDED_FOR variable to host, this improves privacy since your IP address cannot be logged. High anonymity - HTTP Servers of this type don't send HTTP_X_FORWARDED_FOR, HTTP_VIA and HTTP_PROXY_CONNECTION variables. Host doesn't even know you are using proxy server an of course it doesn't know your IP address." |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FAQ: How do spammers get people's email addresses? | Pop | Foster Parents | 4 | June 4th 05 01:09 PM |
Abuses found at foster homes | Jack Liddy | Foster Parents | 13 | May 5th 05 11:53 PM |
Those Deadly Tasers again | [email protected] | Foster Parents | 79 | May 5th 05 02:15 PM |
FYI 0028 Minimum Set of Guidelines | Pop | Foster Parents | 0 | May 1st 05 03:49 PM |
RFC 1855 | Pop | Foster Parents | 0 | May 1st 05 03:42 PM |