Does pro-choice apply to child support?

The abortion group is full of zealous pro-choice men, while right
next door, the child support group looks like a he-man woman haters
club.

In the abortion group, a pro-choicer is labeled as every terrible
thing known to man and woman. And yet, in the freely accessible
child support group, a "woman's right to choose" is used as a club
to beat up on women asking about child support.

"DB" wrote:
These women just think they can use men as ATM's when they can't
afford to raise the child on their own.

"Shadow36" wrote:
When you decided to keep the child, you took all the
responsibility to raise and support that child by yourself.

whatamess wrote:
YOU had the option of having an abortion... why doesn't he have
the same, when he also didn't want to be a parent at the time and
told you so?

So why does a pro-choicer zealously support a woman's right to
choose, at the same time he is dead silent when men use pro-choice
as a weapon against women asking about child support?

Do you agree that pro-choice means a woman has all the
responsibility for raising a child since she had the right to choose
abortion instead? Do you not care that your pro-choice argument is
being used to beat up on women asking for child support?

Cry havoc, and let loose the mental gymnasts!




--
The first big front wheel rollerblades.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/27532210@N04/2565924423/
Google Groups is destroying the USENET archive,
to hell with Google.

"John Doe" wrote in

In the abortion group, a pro-choicer is labeled as every terrible
thing known to man and woman. And yet, in the freely accessible
child support group, a "woman's right to choose" is used as a club
to beat up on women asking about child support.

So because a woman made the poor choice to have unprotected sex, it's OK to
murder the baby or worse yet have the sex partner support her for the next
18 years?

In our last episode,
,
the lovely and talented DB
broadcast on alt.politics.democrats:


"John Doe" wrote in

In the abortion group, a pro-choicer is labeled as every terrible
thing known to man and woman. And yet, in the freely accessible
child support group, a "woman's right to choose" is used as a club
to beat up on women asking about child support.

So because a woman made the poor choice to have unprotected sex, it's OK to
murder the baby

Nobody says it is okay to murder babies.

or worse yet have the sex partner support her for the next
18 years?

He made a poor choice when he decided to have unprotected sex.

--
Lars Eighner http://larseighner.com/
The best way to support the troops right now
is to take them out of hazard's way. -- U.S. Army Lt. Gen. William Odem (Ret.)

Lars Eighner wrote:

or worse yet have the sex partner support her for the next
18 years?

He made a poor choice when he decided to have unprotected sex.

A classic anti-choice argument.

--
Ray Fischer

"Lars Eighner" wrote in message
om...
In our last episode,
,
the lovely and talented DB
broadcast on alt.politics.democrats:


"John Doe" wrote in

In the abortion group, a pro-choicer is labeled as every terrible
thing known to man and woman. And yet, in the freely accessible
child support group, a "woman's right to choose" is used as a club
to beat up on women asking about child support.

So because a woman made the poor choice to have unprotected sex, it's OK
to
murder the baby

Nobody says it is okay to murder babies.

or worse yet have the sex partner support her for the next
18 years?

He made a poor choice when he decided to have unprotected sex.

As did she. Yet, the woman isn't hounded to the ends of the Earth for her
folly now is she? It isn't she who is hunted, has her name plastered around
the world, her name slandered, her credit ruined, her pay taken at the point
of a gun. Nor does the woman face near certain incarceration if she is
indigent and cannot pay.

Equality under the law, my ass.

This is Dusty's brain on drugs:
Yet, the woman isn't hounded to the ends of the Earth for her
folly now is she? It isn't she who is hunted, has her name plastered around
the world, her name slandered, her credit ruined, her pay taken at the point
of a gun. Nor does the woman face near certain incarceration if she is
indigent and cannot pay.

When you get pregnant and bear a child, let's discuss this again.

Swill
--
No, his mind is not for rent
To any God or government.
Always hopeful, yet discontent,
He knows changes arent permanent,
But change is. -- Geddy Lee/Rush
http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/astropix.html

"Governor Swill" wrote in message
...
This is Dusty's brain on drugs:
Yet, the woman isn't hounded to the ends of the Earth for her
folly now is she? It isn't she who is hunted, has her name plastered
around
the world, her name slandered, her credit ruined, her pay taken at the
point
of a gun. Nor does the woman face near certain incarceration if she is
indigent and cannot pay.

When you get pregnant and bear a child, let's discuss this again.

Oh, are you one of those people who consider mothers to be parents and
fathers to be unnecessary?

"Governor Swill" wrote in message
...
This is Dusty's brain on drugs:
Yet, the woman isn't hounded to the ends of the Earth for her
folly now is she? It isn't she who is hunted, has her name plastered
around
the world, her name slandered, her credit ruined, her pay taken at the
point
of a gun. Nor does the woman face near certain incarceration if she
is
indigent and cannot pay.

When you get pregnant and bear a child, let's discuss this again.

Swill
--

So you're saying that only those directly and intimately involved in any
situation should have a voice in the situation?
That would mean that homicide is quite legal since the victims would
never say a word against it.

IOW, you're post above is completely illogical.
Phil #3

"Governor Swill" wrote in message
...
This is Dusty's brain on drugs:
Yet, the woman isn't hounded to the ends of the Earth for her
folly now is she? It isn't she who is hunted, has her name plastered
around
the world, her name slandered, her credit ruined, her pay taken at the
point
of a gun. Nor does the woman face near certain incarceration if she is
indigent and cannot pay.

When you get pregnant and bear a child, let's discuss this again.

Well, Trip-X, when you get your head outta your ass and have a coherant
thought, we'll be able to have a conversation.

"Lars Eighner" wrote in message
om...
In our last episode,
,
the lovely and talented DB
broadcast on alt.politics.democrats:


"John Doe" wrote in

In the abortion group, a pro-choicer is labeled as every terrible
thing known to man and woman. And yet, in the freely accessible
child support group, a "woman's right to choose" is used as a club
to beat up on women asking about child support.

So because a woman made the poor choice to have unprotected sex, it's OK
to
murder the baby

Nobody says it is okay to murder babies.

or worse yet have the sex partner support her for the next
18 years?

He made a poor choice when he decided to have unprotected sex.

So did she. Now *both* of them need to step up and *be parents*--and each
needs to allow the other to be a parent, too. Mom being the parent and dad
paying for it is not the solution. 50/50 joint custody should be the
default position.