Free Notice of Appeal Form

Don't believe everything you read on the net. I could just as easily create a website offshore that said the was a child molestor, and there would not be a thing you could do about it.

I don't agree with everything Ken has done on, nor the way he acts but that particular website is a bunch of fiction......hell it even claims "I" am Ken....which should have given you a clue about its validity.

BTW this is an unmoderated NG, so asking someone to say out of it is just as wrong as spamming it.
"Editor -- Child Support News" wrote in message ...
Ken,

Your reputation relating to dad's rights ain't the greatest...see http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com/ .

You are the same "Ken Pangborn" referenced on this guy's site, right?

Here's a quote:

Ken has a history of harassing other people, and is well known for his penchant for starting flamewars, even ranging back to the days of FidoNET. Anyone who has a difference of opinion with Ken runs the risk of being attacked. This can take on many forms, ranging from a few words of profanity and vulgarity to libelous, defamatory lies being posted on the internet. In extreme cases, Ken may resort to offline harassment of yourself, family members, friends, and employers.

I asked you nicely to keep this out of alt.child-support...why not respect my request?





"krp" wrote in message ...

"Editor -- Child Support News" wrote in
message ...

The fighting between Pangborn and Hirschfeld have been going on throughout
USENET for quite a while.

Oh BULL****. This past week is the first time either of us has spoken about
the other, MORON! Both Bob and I have had our personal FAN club stalkers. In
Bob's case he EARNED his.

Don't believe everything you read on the net. I could just as easily create a website offshore that said the was a child molestor, and there would not be a thing you could do about it.

I don't agree with everything Ken has done on, nor the way he acts but that particular website is a bunch of fiction......hell it even claims "I" am Ken....which should have given you a clue about its validity.

BTW this is an unmoderated NG, so asking someone to say out of it is just as wrong as spamming it.
"Editor -- Child Support News" wrote in message ...
Ken,

Your reputation relating to dad's rights ain't the greatest...see http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com/ .

You are the same "Ken Pangborn" referenced on this guy's site, right?

Here's a quote:

Ken has a history of harassing other people, and is well known for his penchant for starting flamewars, even ranging back to the days of FidoNET. Anyone who has a difference of opinion with Ken runs the risk of being attacked. This can take on many forms, ranging from a few words of profanity and vulgarity to libelous, defamatory lies being posted on the internet. In extreme cases, Ken may resort to offline harassment of yourself, family members, friends, and employers.

I asked you nicely to keep this out of alt.child-support...why not respect my request?





"krp" wrote in message ...

"Editor -- Child Support News" wrote in
message ...

The fighting between Pangborn and Hirschfeld have been going on throughout
USENET for quite a while.

Oh BULL****. This past week is the first time either of us has spoken about
the other, MORON! Both Bob and I have had our personal FAN club stalkers. In
Bob's case he EARNED his.

I'm aware this is an unmoderated group...by whining about these two guys is certainly off-topic, wouldn't you agree?

"P.Fritz" wrote in message ...
Don't believe everything you read on the net. I could just as easily create a website offshore that said the was a child molestor, and there would not be a thing you could do about it.

I don't agree with everything Ken has done on, nor the way he acts but that particular website is a bunch of fiction......hell it even claims "I" am Ken....which should have given you a clue about its validity.

BTW this is an unmoderated NG, so asking someone to say out of it is just as wrong as spamming it.

I'm aware this is an unmoderated group...by whining about these two guys is certainly off-topic, wouldn't you agree?

"P.Fritz" wrote in message ...
Don't believe everything you read on the net. I could just as easily create a website offshore that said the was a child molestor, and there would not be a thing you could do about it.

I don't agree with everything Ken has done on, nor the way he acts but that particular website is a bunch of fiction......hell it even claims "I" am Ken....which should have given you a clue about its validity.

BTW this is an unmoderated NG, so asking someone to say out of it is just as wrong as spamming it.

I'm aware this is an unmoderated group...by whining about these two guys is certainly off-topic, wouldn't you agree?

"P.Fritz" wrote in message ...
Don't believe everything you read on the net. I could just as easily create a website offshore that said the was a child molestor, and there would not be a thing you could do about it.

I don't agree with everything Ken has done on, nor the way he acts but that particular website is a bunch of fiction......hell it even claims "I" am Ken....which should have given you a clue about its validity.

BTW this is an unmoderated NG, so asking someone to say out of it is just as wrong as spamming it.

"Bob" wrote in message
...

The fighting between Pangborn and Hirschfeld have been going on
throughout

USENET for quite a while.

Oh BULL****. This past week is the first time either of us has spoken
about
the other, MORON! Both Bob and I have had our personal FAN club
stalkers. In
Bob's case he EARNED his.

Idiots like "krp" keep feminists in power.


Hardly. Because I think Hirschfeld is a bad guy? GET REAL.

"Bob" wrote in message
...

The fighting between Pangborn and Hirschfeld have been going on
throughout

USENET for quite a while.

Oh BULL****. This past week is the first time either of us has spoken
about
the other, MORON! Both Bob and I have had our personal FAN club
stalkers. In
Bob's case he EARNED his.

Idiots like "krp" keep feminists in power.


Hardly. Because I think Hirschfeld is a bad guy? GET REAL.

"Bob" wrote in message
...

The fighting between Pangborn and Hirschfeld have been going on
throughout

USENET for quite a while.

Oh BULL****. This past week is the first time either of us has spoken
about
the other, MORON! Both Bob and I have had our personal FAN club
stalkers. In
Bob's case he EARNED his.

Idiots like "krp" keep feminists in power.


Hardly. Because I think Hirschfeld is a bad guy? GET REAL.

"Editor -- Child Support News" wrote in message ...
Ken,

Your reputation relating to dad's rights ain't the greatest...see http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com/ .

You are the same "Ken Pangborn" referenced on this guy's site, right?
================================================== ============

You must be a VERY weak minded individual. Anybody can put ANY bull**** about somebody on a website they want. You can even MAKE UP people's names and claim they have complaints about somebody.

There is a VAST difference between a website FULL of fabrications and somebody being CONVICTED by a Supreme Court.

Here is a little challenge for you. Something EASY to check out. Go to the site where Moore has the name of the Attorney who he has claimed was a former associate of mine from Baltimore, Maryland. Kosivlotisky. Then go to the Baltimore County Bar Association and ask if there has EVER been such an attorney as a member of the Bar there. When they tell you NO, then go to the Maryland Bar and see if THEY have him listed EVER..... The answer again is NO... THEN you can check all the surrounding states. When you find they ALL say "NO!" you can move on and ask if there has EVER been such a named person ANYWHERE in the United States who is an attorney. You'll find another "NO!"

Then you THAT doesn't teach you enough, take a look at one of the people Moore ALLEGES is a former client. Will Rainey. Then do a web search for William Rainey Harper College. You'll find it just a couple miles from Mr. Moore's home in Bolingbrook, Illinois

The first page DISCLAIMER......... SHOULD have but obviously did NOT warn you that the items ON the website are only the "OPINIONS" of the owner. You see the little wuss believes that the FACTS he claims are "ONLY OPINIONS" and therefore FREE SPEECH! I can't help what you choose to believe. That is a personal decision.
But you aren't setting yourself up as much of an intellectual by believing that trash.

"Editor -- Child Support News" wrote in message ...
Ken,

Your reputation relating to dad's rights ain't the greatest...see http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com/ .

You are the same "Ken Pangborn" referenced on this guy's site, right?
================================================== ============

You must be a VERY weak minded individual. Anybody can put ANY bull**** about somebody on a website they want. You can even MAKE UP people's names and claim they have complaints about somebody.

There is a VAST difference between a website FULL of fabrications and somebody being CONVICTED by a Supreme Court.

Here is a little challenge for you. Something EASY to check out. Go to the site where Moore has the name of the Attorney who he has claimed was a former associate of mine from Baltimore, Maryland. Kosivlotisky. Then go to the Baltimore County Bar Association and ask if there has EVER been such an attorney as a member of the Bar there. When they tell you NO, then go to the Maryland Bar and see if THEY have him listed EVER..... The answer again is NO... THEN you can check all the surrounding states. When you find they ALL say "NO!" you can move on and ask if there has EVER been such a named person ANYWHERE in the United States who is an attorney. You'll find another "NO!"

Then you THAT doesn't teach you enough, take a look at one of the people Moore ALLEGES is a former client. Will Rainey. Then do a web search for William Rainey Harper College. You'll find it just a couple miles from Mr. Moore's home in Bolingbrook, Illinois

The first page DISCLAIMER......... SHOULD have but obviously did NOT warn you that the items ON the website are only the "OPINIONS" of the owner. You see the little wuss believes that the FACTS he claims are "ONLY OPINIONS" and therefore FREE SPEECH! I can't help what you choose to believe. That is a personal decision.
But you aren't setting yourself up as much of an intellectual by believing that trash.