Vaccination Programs Under Scrutiny (Part 3)

http://www.naturalnews.com/z022572.html

NaturalNews.com printable article
Originally published January 31 2008
Vaccination Programs Under Scrutiny (Part 3)


(NaturalNews) Vaccines are composed of protein, bacterial and viral
material, as well as preservatives, neutralizers, and carrying agents. The
vaccine against bacterial meningitis is made from the brains and heart of
cows among other highly toxic components. Alarmed by the outbreak of mad cow's
disease, the Italian authorities ordered the seizure of the vaccine in
January 1997 for fear it could cause the human version of the disease. By
injecting such cocktails of foreign and destructive substances directly into
the bloodstream, the human body stands little or no chance of neutralizing
the poisons.

Under normal circumstances, all ingested foods, beverages, etc. have to pass
through the mucus membranes, the intestinal walls, or the liver before they
are permitted into such important areas as the blood, the heart, or the
brain. The sudden appearance of a poison in the bloodstream is often met by
a counterattack of the immune system that uses an entire arsenal of
antibodies to prevent death from poisoning (allergic reaction). This
allergic response can lead to a sudden, sometimes fatal, collapse known as
anaphylactic shock response. Among the causes of anaphylactic shock are
immunizations for diphtheria, tetanus, hepatitis B, and whooping cough. A
young person's immune system hasn't typically matured enough to be effective
against this type of onslaught.

No less dangerous is the Guillain-Barré syndrome which leads to paralysis
and is caused by immunizations for measles, diphtheria, influenza, tetanus,
and the oral polio vaccine. This is hardly surprising when one considers the
high toxicity of these vaccines. It is well known that children whose immune
systems are already weak experience more serious complications than those
whose constitution and immune system are much stronger. Still, vaccines are
given indiscriminately regardless of the children's health status. Many
children at infancy don't even get the chance to be healthy later in life
because they are pumped full of these poisons against which they are
helpless. At this stage of development, a child has not yet acquired full
natural immunity and has little ability to protect himself.

Increasing evidence shows that chronic diseases, such as rheumatoid
arthritis, encephalitis, multiple sclerosis, leukemia, other forms of cancer
and even AIDS diseases are linked to vaccinations administered in the early
stages of life. Rheumatoid arthritis is an inflammatory disease of the
joints, which had been thought to afflict only the elderly. More recently
though, the crippling disease has spread among the young generation and
measles and rubella inoculations have been identified as the cause.

Researchers from the American Food and Drug Administration discovered that
vaccinations, particularly the hepatitis B shot, could cause hair loss. They
estimate that 50,000 Americans suffer hair loss (alopecia) after
immunization every year. The report was published by the Journal of the
American Medical Association in 1997.

It is nearly impossible to estimate the damage and suffering that has been
created and will occur in the future as a result of inadequate information
about the dangers of modern immunization programs. Parents want to do what
is best for their children and they carry a heavy burden of responsibility
to keep them healthy and safe. Misinformation can create a strong conflict
in parents because they don't want to neglect their children's health or
cause them any harm.

Most health authorities are not exactly helpful in supporting parents to
choose what is best for their children. In spite of damaging evidence, such
as the following, they still support the use of immunizations. For instance,
the use of the mercury-based thimerosal as a preservative in vaccines has
been associated with autism. Despite the evidence, mercury is still being
added to vaccines at completely unsafe levels considering the fact that it
is a known neurotoxin. A recent study conducted by the University of Calgary
showed that mercury ions alter the cell-membrane of developing neurons in
babies and young children, directly contributing to autism.

In the late 1990s, the U.S. Public Health Service and the American Academy
of Pediatrics petitioned drug companies to remove thimerosal from vaccines
intended for children. Why? Well, in one study that examined CDC statistics,
researchers found evidence that children who receive just three vaccines
containing thimerosal are 27 times more likely to develop autism, compared
to children who get vaccinations containing no thimerosal. That's a 2,700
percent increase. Who needs more proof than that? Apparently, the current
(2007) administration of the U.S. government does.

Despite a 2004 campaign promise to the contrary, President Bush promised to
veto the HHS-Labor-Education Appropriations Bill, which includes a measure
to ban childhood flu vaccines that contain thimerosal because of cost
concerns. As for now, despite the warnings, flu vaccines which contain
thimerosal continue to be recommended for all pregnant women, infants and
children, even though the Institute of Medicine recommended in 2001 that
these population groups not be exposed to thimerosal-containing vaccines.
One in every six women of childbearing age has enough mercury in her
bloodstream to cause neurological damage to her unborn children, according
to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

Is it mere coincidence that rates of autism increased when the Center for
Disease Control inserted additions to the recommended vaccination program
for infants in 1988? In the 1980s, autism rates were estimated at only six
in 10,000 children. Today one in 150 children is autistic, though in some
areas autism affects closer to one in 50 children. The U.S. Food and Drug
Administration has acknowledged that thimerosal can be a neurotoxin (knowing
very well that mercury is a neurotoxin), and in 2004 stated that
thimerosal-containing vaccines were associated with autism. As of 2003,
there were 1.5 million autistic U.S. children, adding $90 billion per year
to the already skyrocketing health care costs.

According to ex-vaccine researcher Dr. Davis, who worked for many years in
the laboratories of major pharmaceutical houses and the U.S. government's
National Institutes of Health (his true name cannot be mentioned here for
obvious reasons), all vaccines are dangerous to health. In an interview he
stated that vaccines involve the human immune system in a process that tends
to compromise immunity. "They can actually cause the disease they are
supposed to prevent. They can cause other diseases than the ones they are
supposed to prevent," says this scientist.

While working with different vaccines, Dr. Davis found a number of
contaminants in them. In the Rimavex measles vaccine, he found various
chicken viruses. In the polio vaccine, he found acanthamoeba, a so-called
brain-eating amoeba, and a simian cytomegalovirus. Also discovered was
simian foamy virus in the rotavirus vaccine and bird-cancer viruses in the
MMR vaccine. Various microorganisms were present in the anthrax vaccine and
potentially dangerous enzyme inhibitors were present in several other
vaccines. Duck, dog, and rabbit viruses were present in the rubella vaccine,
avian leucosis virus in the flu vaccine, and pestivirus in the MMR vaccine.

What most people don't know is that some polio vaccines, adenovirus
vaccines, rubella and hepatitis A and measles vaccines have been made with
aborted human fetal tissue. Dr. Davis found what he believed were bacterial
fragments and poliovirus in these vaccines from time to time which may have
come from that fetal tissue. In addition, he also found "fragments" of human
hair and human mucus. Apart from such contamination, it is worth mentioning
that standard chemicals like formaldehyde, mercury, and aluminum are
purposely put into vaccines. It is left up to your imagination as to what
must happen to the health prospects of our future generations when such
cocktails of ghastly poisons are directly injected into the bloodstream of a
child.

Dr. Davis conceded that no long-term studies have been done on any vaccines,
and that long-term follow-up is not done in any careful way. The assumption
is made that vaccines do not cause problems, so why should anyone check?
Besides, a vaccine reaction is defined so that all negative reactions are
said to occur very soon after the shot is given. But a vaccine obviously
acts in the body for a long period of time after it is given. A reaction can
be very gradual, just as chemical poisoning can occur very gradually.
Neurological problems can develop over time. In actual fact, a vaccine that
contains mercury may not show any damage for several months. And who is
testing or investigating when a child "becomes" autistic for no apparent
reason? Those administering the vaccines claim "This vaccine is safe." How
can they be so sure of this when there is no scientific research to back up
that claim, and when no testing procedures are in place to ensure their
safety? Quite the opposite is true - plenty of evidence shows that vaccines
are not safe.

Questions have recently emerged in the United States and Australia about the
effectiveness and possibly dangerous side effects of Gardasil, Merck's newly
licensed vaccine for human papillomavirus (HPV). This vaccine is given to
young girls to prevent cervical cancer, which kills about 3,700 women each
year. On June 9, 2007, The British Medical Journal reported that three
deaths occurred in the U.S. shortly after immunization with the vaccine;
these were among 1,637 adverse reactions reported by Judicial Watch, a
public interest watchdog. Judicial Watch obtained the reports from the Food
and Drug Administration using the Freedom of Information Act. The reports
were filed through the FDA's vaccine adverse event reporting system.

In Melbourne, Australia, 25 girls at a Catholic high school experienced
headache, nausea, and dizziness after receiving their first injection of the
vaccine, The Age reported. Merck, the manufacturer of this vaccine, is the
same company that made Vioxx, the drug that killed over 60,000 people and
that tried to conceal the facts of Vioxx's deadly side effects. Although
cervical cancer is easily preventable through non-drug approaches, Merck is
trying to make this vaccination mandatory in all U.S. states. The drug-giant
is clearly not interested in helping out a relatively few young girls who
could be at risk of developing cervical cancer later in their lives; it
rather wants to open up the huge potential market for cancer vaccines.
Merck's own literature says it is important to realize that Gardasil does
not protect women against some "non-vaccine" HPV types. In other words, even
if girls accept the risks and get vaccinated, they can still get HPV.

The amount of false "information" (otherwise known as "lies") in the
preceding post is very impressive. While one should be as informed as
possible about the risks of vaccines, it's better to be aware of the
*real* risks, not the imaginary ones.

It's also important to be aware of the benefits of vaccines. The web
site for the Centers for Disease Control (www.cdc.gov) has high-quality
information available which can help you make an informed decision.

--Beth Kevles

Thanks for showing us what kind of crap is out on the internet. It is
sad to think that people believe this misinformation.

Jeff

On Feb 6, 8:02*am, (Beth Kevles) wrote:
The amount of false "information" (otherwise known as "lies") in the
preceding post is very impressive. *While one should be as informed as
possible about the risks of vaccines, it's better to be aware of the
*real* risks, not the imaginary ones. *

It's also important to be aware of the benefits of vaccines. *The web
site for the Centers for Disease Control (www.cdc.gov) has high-quality
information available which can help you make an informed decision.

--Beth Kevles

The problem with your post is all the "assumptions" made.

You assume that vaccines are "safe and effective." Show us some
proof.
The reality is that no vaccine is 100% safe or effective. Tell the
safety issue to a child with autism, JA, Type 1 diabetes, or MS.
These risks are as real as they can get, up to, and including death.

The only benefit of vaccines is to the docs and big pharma. The great
vaccine lie and hoax keeps the dump sheeple in line with their sleeves
rolled up or their pants down. If you want the "official" lie
certainly go to the CDC. They won't be too busy hiding their data to
fill you with their own brand of propaganda and pharma swill.

DrCee
Not a member of the medical monopoly.

On Feb 6, 3:36*pm, wrote:
On Feb 6, 8:02*am, (Beth Kevles) wrote:

The amount of false "information" (otherwise known as "lies") in the
preceding post is very impressive. *While one should be as informed as
possible about the risks of vaccines, it's better to be aware of the
*real* risks, not the imaginary ones. *

It's also important to be aware of the benefits of vaccines. *The web
site for the Centers for Disease Control (www.cdc.gov) has high-quality
information available which can help you make an informed decision.

--Beth Kevles

The problem with your post is all the "assumptions" made.

You assume that vaccines are "safe and effective." *Show us some
proof.
The reality is that no vaccine is 100% safe or effective. *Tell the
safety issue to a child with autism, JA, Type 1 diabetes, or MS.
These risks are as real as they can get, up to, and including death.

The only benefit of vaccines is to the docs and big pharma. *The great
vaccine lie and hoax keeps the dump sheeple in line with their sleeves
rolled up or their pants down. *If you want the "official" lie
certainly go to the CDC. *They won't be too busy hiding their data to
fill you with their own brand of propaganda and pharma swill.

DrCee
Not a member of the medical monopoly.

Addendum:
check out vaclib.org for some liberating information.

DrCee

"Beth Kevles" wrote in message
...

The amount of false "information" (otherwise known as "lies") in the
preceding post is very impressive. While one should be as informed as
possible about the risks of vaccines, it's better to be aware of the
*real* risks, not the imaginary ones.

Are there lies?

It's also important to be aware of the benefits of vaccines. The web
site for the Centers for Disease Control (www.cdc.gov) has high-quality
information available which can help you make an informed decision.

But isn't CDC a government organisation?
If the FDA is anything to go by it has been well and truly infiltrated and
pushing pharmaceutical disinformation.

Carole
www.cellsalts.net


--Beth Kevles

Carole wrote:
"Beth Kevles" wrote in message
...
The amount of false "information" (otherwise known as "lies") in the
preceding post is very impressive. While one should be as informed as
possible about the risks of vaccines, it's better to be aware of the
*real* risks, not the imaginary ones.

Are there lies?
It's also important to be aware of the benefits of vaccines. The web
site for the Centers for Disease Control (www.cdc.gov) has high-quality
information available which can help you make an informed decision.

But isn't CDC a government organisation?

Of course it is. It is one of the organizations that has done the most
to decrease infectious diseases in the US and other parts of the world.

If the FDA is anything to go by it has been well and truly infiltrated and
pushing pharmaceutical disinformation.

You mean like the Russian government is infiltrated by the American spies?

Carole
www.cellsalts.net

Thanks for the laugh at cellsalts.net. That is a site for clueless
suckers. It is clear that anyone who would associate herself with that
site (as you have done) has no clue about science or medicine.

No evidence that the cell salts work at all is offered on that site.

Jeff

--Beth Kevles

In article tLYrj.2477$ip3.2469@trnddc07, Jeff says...

Carole wrote:
"Beth Kevles" wrote in message
...
The amount of false "information" (otherwise known as "lies") in the
preceding post is very impressive. While one should be as informed as
possible about the risks of vaccines, it's better to be aware of the
*real* risks, not the imaginary ones.

Are there lies?
It's also important to be aware of the benefits of vaccines. The web
site for the Centers for Disease Control (www.cdc.gov) has high-quality
information available which can help you make an informed decision.

But isn't CDC a government organisation?

Of course it is. It is one of the organizations that has done the most
to decrease infectious diseases in the US and other parts of the world.

If the FDA is anything to go by it has been well and truly infiltrated and
pushing pharmaceutical disinformation.

You mean like the Russian government is infiltrated by the American spies?

Carole
www.cellsalts.net

Thanks for the laugh at cellsalts.net. That is a site for clueless
suckers. It is clear that anyone who would associate herself with that
site (as you have done) has no clue about science or medicine.

No evidence that the cell salts work at all is offered on that site.


Nope. But of course there are links to *buy* cell salts and books, and links to
(amazingly) expert cites from websites admittedly discontinued. Experts have
track records of published articles, notably in refereed scientific journals,
which are available through scientific literature search engines. They would
never be (oopsie...) discontinued.

Banty

On Feb 11, 9:58*am, Banty wrote:
In article tLYrj.2477$ip3.2469@trnddc07, Jeff says...







Carole wrote:
"Beth Kevles" wrote in message
...
The amount of false "information" (otherwise known as "lies") in the
preceding post is very impressive. *While one should be as informed as
possible about the risks of vaccines, it's better to be aware of the
*real* risks, not the imaginary ones.

Are there lies?
It's also important to be aware of the benefits of vaccines. *The web
site for the Centers for Disease Control (www.cdc.gov) has high-quality
information available which can help you make an informed decision.

But isn't CDC a government organisation?

Of course it is. It is one of the organizations that has done the most
to decrease infectious diseases in the US and other parts of the world.

If the FDA is anything to go by it has been well and truly infiltrated and
pushing pharmaceutical disinformation.

You mean like the Russian government is infiltrated by the American spies?

Carole
www.cellsalts.net

Thanks for the laugh at cellsalts.net. That is a site for clueless
suckers. It is clear that anyone who would associate herself with that
site (as you have done) has no clue about science or medicine.

No evidence that the cell salts work at all is offered on that site.

Nope. *But of course there are links to *buy* cell salts and books, and links to
(amazingly) expert cites from websites admittedly discontinued. *Experts have
track records of published articles, notably in refereed scientific journals,
which are available through scientific literature search engines. *They would
never be (oopsie...) discontinued.

Banty- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

"Experts have track records of published articles,etc, etc." How
naive. The so-called experts are allowed to be experts only in their
work agrees with main line medical thought and big pharma. Otherwise,
the experts are not funded, not allowed to publish, and many journals
not agreeing with big pharma are not indexed. Even many indexed
journals have been "cleansed" of offending articles and authors.

DrCee
Not a member of the medical monopoly or big pharma.

In article ,
says...

On Feb 11, 9:58=A0am, Banty wrote:
In article tLYrj.2477$ip3.2469@trnddc07, Jeff says...







Carole wrote:
"Beth Kevles" wrote in message
...
The amount of false "information" (otherwise known as "lies") in the
preceding post is very impressive. =A0While one should be as informed =
as
possible about the risks of vaccines, it's better to be aware of the
*real* risks, not the imaginary ones.

Are there lies?
It's also important to be aware of the benefits of vaccines. =A0The we=
b
site for the Centers for Disease Control (www.cdc.gov) has high-qualit=
y
information available which can help you make an informed decision.

But isn't CDC a government organisation?

Of course it is. It is one of the organizations that has done the most
to decrease infectious diseases in the US and other parts of the world.

If the FDA is anything to go by it has been well and truly infiltrated =
and
pushing pharmaceutical disinformation.

You mean like the Russian government is infiltrated by the American spies=
?

Carole
www.cellsalts.net

Thanks for the laugh at cellsalts.net. That is a site for clueless
suckers. It is clear that anyone who would associate herself with that
site (as you have done) has no clue about science or medicine.

No evidence that the cell salts work at all is offered on that site.

Nope. =A0But of course there are links to *buy* cell salts and books, and =
links to
(amazingly) expert cites from websites admittedly discontinued. =A0Experts=
have
track records of published articles, notably in refereed scientific journa=
ls,
which are available through scientific literature search engines. =A0They =
would
never be (oopsie...) discontinued.

Banty- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

"Experts have track records of published articles,etc, etc." How
naive. The so-called experts are allowed to be experts only in their
work agrees with main line medical thought and big pharma. Otherwise,
the experts are not funded, not allowed to publish, and many journals
not agreeing with big pharma are not indexed. Even many indexed
journals have been "cleansed" of offending articles and authors.

DrCee
Not a member of the medical monopoly or big pharma.

So, you roll out the well worn hack excuse that the 'establishment' is
suppressing research and publication. This isn't about "indexing" (where do you
even get that term) - this is about publishing in archival sccientific journals
with peer review. Journals even allow submitting authors to list possible peers
they do *not* want review by if they suspect bias or overarching competition.

Follow the scientific process, including reproducing results at independant
laboratories and presenting at conferences to scientific peers, and you'd be
able to show your case. That is what science is designed for.

It is *not* designed for fringe groups with sales interests in products to play
on luddite fears.

DrBanty