Ree: Why do parents keep doing this?

firedancer623 wrote:
"Briar Rabbit" wrote in message
...

firedancer623 wrote:




Cosmetic benefits? Who are you to say which is better? Opinion is
everything. My husband is cir'ced wishes he wasn't. And I much prefer
the look (and feel) of a natural penis to a unnatural, mutilated one.
That scar is just *so* pleasant after all.



So you ARE a skin freak then.


I guess I am



Good! Now that is settled you can stop the ridiculous pretense that your
anti-circumcision position is based on any reason other than your
peculiar psychosexual interest in the foreskin.

wrote:

See, to those of us who are normal, "cutting hurts babies" has an
inflammatory and deeply disturbed ring to it.
-----------------------
And it should, which is why you're abnormal and sick.


Popping babies out of a mother's womb also hurts! In fact, I can't
think of anything more traumatic for a mother & her newborn than the
birthing process, can you?! Yet, I do not see you and your scab
scavenger cohorts petitioning the excrutiating pain that is
experienced for both mothers and their newborns!! Yes, you will
respond with: "but procreation is necessary for the existence of
humanity." And I respond with: "but circumcision is also necessary for
the overall well-being & health of our children."
-------------------------
Lie. Birth is necessary, circumcision is not.
Nor is it provably beneficial.
Steve

wrote:

Now prove to us that you have a hubby, let alone a snatch! LOL! DOH!
Unfknblvbl!ehe If you had chosen to omit the words "mutilation" &
"scar," you may have had an easier time trying to convince us of your
DRECK! While beauty is indeed in the eye of the beholder, innate
beauty does not lie!
---------------------
Nonsense, there is no such thing. Intact and yound and elastic are
the only criteria for that. Young foreskins are AS attractive as
old ones may not be.


same applies to circumcised vs. uncircumcised. One is a fugly scab of
skin that looks like a rodent trapped inside of a garden hose, while
------------------------
You're an extremely sick little piece of antihumane ****.
Steve

Briar Rabbit wrote:

firedancer623 wrote:



Cosmetic benefits? Who are you to say which is better? Opinion is
everything. My husband is cir'ced wishes he wasn't. And I much prefer the
look (and feel) of a natural penis to a unnatural, mutilated one. That scar
is just *so* pleasant after all.


So you ARE a skin freak then.
----------------
No, there isn't any such thing. Liking normalcy has no label.
Steve

Briar Rabbit wrote:

firedancer623 wrote:
"Briar Rabbit" wrote in message
...

firedancer623 wrote:




Cosmetic benefits? Who are you to say which is better? Opinion is
everything. My husband is cir'ced wishes he wasn't. And I much prefer
the look (and feel) of a natural penis to a unnatural, mutilated one.
That scar is just *so* pleasant after all.



So you ARE a skin freak then.


I guess I am


Good! Now that is settled you can stop the ridiculous pretense that your
anti-circumcision position is based on any reason other than your
peculiar psychosexual interest in the foreskin.
-------------------------
It's not "peculiar", since a majority of humans share it.

YOU'RE the sick little piece of ****.
Steve

(Winding Highway) wrote in message ...

From: "R. Steve Walz"


YOU'RE the sick little piece of ****.
Steve

You're an extremely sick little piece of antihumane ****.
Steve

you're abnormal and sick...
Steve

DANGEROUSLY MISTAKEN CRANKISM!!
Steve

You're nothing but a ****, you asshole.....Steve

you sick twisted little son of a bitch.
Steve

you're
sexually sick and antisexually neurotic!!
Steve

you're just another
sick little antisexual homophobe.
Steve

You are delusionally terrified...
Psychosexual motiovations aren't "base", except to sickies like YOU!...Wh6y
you're nothing but a sick little phobic!!...
you sick moron!!..
Steve

That's your emotional disorder talking...
Steve

And so on. After wading yet again through Steves daily deluge of name calling, I am inclined to commend to him the words of the greatest of the Scottish bards, Robert burns:
"O wad some Power the giftie gie us
To see oursels as ithers see us!
It wad frae mony a blunder free us,
An' foolish notion"

Winding, if you can believe, this is tame in comparison to the
blasphemous DRECK that Steve Walz use to spew back in June & July of
2001!eh As the YID of TID, I had to place my sharp cursor tongue on
"decimate" instead of "stun," in order to deal with this raving
anti-Semitic pus pusher!ehehe -D, NYC "In 1983 alone, Jewish-American
scientists received 27% of the Nobel prizes awarded in their
disciplines. In proportion to their population number (2%), the number
of Jews in medicine exceeded 230%, those in psychiatry neared 480%,
and those in mathematics approached 240%." - JEWISH CONTRIBUTIONS TO
THE AMERICAN WAY OF LIFE (By Asher B. Etkes & Saul Stadtmauer)