If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Q on filing for CS and an order for CS
Just wondering on something here. When an CP wants to get child support
they must file the paperwork to do it. It becomes an order when it goes to court, which begins the enforcement procedures against the NCP. Question is what is going on in between the two states? Is it entirely possible that someone could file for CS but it would not become an order for several years (I mean more than 10+)? Could the paperwork be placed "on hold" until the CP uses public assistance setting the gears in motion for a CS order - thus making the CS order have a longer past-due from the time difference between filing and going before a court. An additional question - since paternity would need to be determined in this case, can they use the legal abilities (read: bloodhound unit) of the CS order to really just make you show up for the test, and subject you to the penalities of contempt while they wait for the test? Or do they have to "play nice" until they got you by the DNA? Thanks for any info. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Q on filing for CS and an order for CS
"WiseSarah" wrote in message lkaboutparenting.com... Just wondering on something here. When an CP wants to get child support they must file the paperwork to do it. It becomes an order when it goes to court, which begins the enforcement procedures against the NCP. Question is what is going on in between the two states? Is it entirely possible that someone could file for CS but it would not become an order for several years (I mean more than 10+)? It could, but only from an oversight, one would think. Could the paperwork be placed "on hold" until the CP uses public assistance setting the gears in motion for a CS order - thus making the CS order have a longer past-due from the time difference between filing and going before a court. Ouch. Entirely possible, given the errors I've seen, but that would suck. I wonder if they would try and penalize the payer, for their mistake? An additional question - since paternity would need to be determined in this case, can they use the legal abilities (read: bloodhound unit) of the CS order to really just make you show up for the test, and subject you to the penalities of contempt while they wait for the test? Or do they have to "play nice" until they got you by the DNA? They could probably contempt you for not showing up for the test, at least. short - sounds like a bad deal to me! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Q on filing for CS and an order for CS
"WiseSarah" wrote in message lkaboutparenting.com... Just wondering on something here. When an CP wants to get child support they must file the paperwork to do it. It becomes an order when it goes to court, which begins the enforcement procedures against the NCP. Question is what is going on in between the two states? Is it entirely possible that someone could file for CS but it would not become an order for several years (I mean more than 10+)? It could, but only from an oversight, one would think. Could the paperwork be placed "on hold" until the CP uses public assistance setting the gears in motion for a CS order - thus making the CS order have a longer past-due from the time difference between filing and going before a court. Ouch. Entirely possible, given the errors I've seen, but that would suck. I wonder if they would try and penalize the payer, for their mistake? An additional question - since paternity would need to be determined in this case, can they use the legal abilities (read: bloodhound unit) of the CS order to really just make you show up for the test, and subject you to the penalities of contempt while they wait for the test? Or do they have to "play nice" until they got you by the DNA? They could probably contempt you for not showing up for the test, at least. short - sounds like a bad deal to me! |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Q on filing for CS and an order for CS
"WiseSarah" wrote in message lkaboutparenting.com... Just wondering on something here. When an CP wants to get child support they must file the paperwork to do it. It becomes an order when it goes to court, which begins the enforcement procedures against the NCP. Question is what is going on in between the two states? Is it entirely possible that someone could file for CS but it would not become an order for several years (I mean more than 10+)? It could, but only from an oversight, one would think. Could the paperwork be placed "on hold" until the CP uses public assistance setting the gears in motion for a CS order - thus making the CS order have a longer past-due from the time difference between filing and going before a court. Ouch. Entirely possible, given the errors I've seen, but that would suck. I wonder if they would try and penalize the payer, for their mistake? An additional question - since paternity would need to be determined in this case, can they use the legal abilities (read: bloodhound unit) of the CS order to really just make you show up for the test, and subject you to the penalities of contempt while they wait for the test? Or do they have to "play nice" until they got you by the DNA? They could probably contempt you for not showing up for the test, at least. short - sounds like a bad deal to me! |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Q on filing for CS and an order for CS
"short" wrote in message ... "WiseSarah" wrote in message lkaboutparenting.com... Just wondering on something here. When an CP wants to get child support they must file the paperwork to do it. It becomes an order when it goes to court, which begins the enforcement procedures against the NCP. Question is what is going on in between the two states? Is it entirely possible that someone could file for CS but it would not become an order for several years (I mean more than 10+)? It could, but only from an oversight, one would think. Could the paperwork be placed "on hold" until the CP uses public assistance setting the gears in motion for a CS order - thus making the CS order have a longer past-due from the time difference between filing and going before a court. Ouch. Entirely possible, given the errors I've seen, but that would suck. I wonder if they would try and penalize the payer, for their mistake? An additional question - since paternity would need to be determined in this case, can they use the legal abilities (read: bloodhound unit) of the CS order to really just make you show up for the test, and subject you to the penalities of contempt while they wait for the test? Or do they have to "play nice" until they got you by the DNA? They could probably contempt you for not showing up for the test, at least. What a deal! Contempt for exercising your Fifth Amendment privilege. short - sounds like a bad deal to me! |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Q on filing for CS and an order for CS
"short" wrote in message ... "WiseSarah" wrote in message lkaboutparenting.com... Just wondering on something here. When an CP wants to get child support they must file the paperwork to do it. It becomes an order when it goes to court, which begins the enforcement procedures against the NCP. Question is what is going on in between the two states? Is it entirely possible that someone could file for CS but it would not become an order for several years (I mean more than 10+)? It could, but only from an oversight, one would think. Could the paperwork be placed "on hold" until the CP uses public assistance setting the gears in motion for a CS order - thus making the CS order have a longer past-due from the time difference between filing and going before a court. Ouch. Entirely possible, given the errors I've seen, but that would suck. I wonder if they would try and penalize the payer, for their mistake? An additional question - since paternity would need to be determined in this case, can they use the legal abilities (read: bloodhound unit) of the CS order to really just make you show up for the test, and subject you to the penalities of contempt while they wait for the test? Or do they have to "play nice" until they got you by the DNA? They could probably contempt you for not showing up for the test, at least. What a deal! Contempt for exercising your Fifth Amendment privilege. short - sounds like a bad deal to me! |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Q on filing for CS and an order for CS
"short" wrote in message ... "WiseSarah" wrote in message lkaboutparenting.com... Just wondering on something here. When an CP wants to get child support they must file the paperwork to do it. It becomes an order when it goes to court, which begins the enforcement procedures against the NCP. Question is what is going on in between the two states? Is it entirely possible that someone could file for CS but it would not become an order for several years (I mean more than 10+)? It could, but only from an oversight, one would think. Could the paperwork be placed "on hold" until the CP uses public assistance setting the gears in motion for a CS order - thus making the CS order have a longer past-due from the time difference between filing and going before a court. Ouch. Entirely possible, given the errors I've seen, but that would suck. I wonder if they would try and penalize the payer, for their mistake? An additional question - since paternity would need to be determined in this case, can they use the legal abilities (read: bloodhound unit) of the CS order to really just make you show up for the test, and subject you to the penalities of contempt while they wait for the test? Or do they have to "play nice" until they got you by the DNA? They could probably contempt you for not showing up for the test, at least. What a deal! Contempt for exercising your Fifth Amendment privilege. short - sounds like a bad deal to me! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sample US Supreme Court Petition | Wizardlaw | Child Support | 28 | January 21st 04 06:23 PM |
Sample Supreme Court Petition | Wizardlaw | Child Support | 0 | January 16th 04 03:47 AM |