|Re: 7 state sites for families w CPS prob. spanking

[Kane]

On 15 Sep 2003 14:50:39 GMT, (Fern5827) wrote:

>The states are:
>
>FL
>IA
>IL
>KS
>MO
>NC
>OH
>
>Can all be reached thru Website of:
>
>http://www. CPSWatch.com

While you, Pimp, refer the innocent, do remember you also refer the
guilty and those that could have been helped to reform as parents had
they gotten badly needed assistance from the state.

Then there are those children that will go home to the perps tender
mercies because of you...tsk.

You sad little smelly ****.

Kane

[Kane]

On 15 Sep 2003 21:49:54 GMT, (Fern5827) wrote:

>>You sad little smelly ****.
>>
>>Kane
>
>This is uncalled for SEXUAL HARASSMENT, Kane.

Really? How so?

Are you not engaged in harrassment of your own?

And by supporting abusive parents harassing children sexually who have
been raped by them?

>Stop it immediately.

No.

> This is totally beyond the pale.

No it isn't. It's a very weak accusation. You are far worse than a
smelly little ****. You are a liar that effects others lives
adversely. You are a danger to the truth and humankind.

A Plant is shaken and a Plum falls out.

>The uncouth,

Yah got me there, Sweet Potato.

>foul-mouthed Mouth

Got me again...good for you.

>K-9

Whoops! A name. Are you calling me a dog? Tsk. I expect better from
those that consider themselves genteel ladies, but then you are a
Plant, right?

>insults everyone

Everyone? Hmmm. Not likely. Some perhaps. My apologies folks. This
isn't intended to describe you, only the smelly little ****.

>reading this NG with this
>type of language:

I don't THINK so, Potato. Only those such as your precious little
Twiggy self that think harassment is confined to YOUR use.

And USENET has no restrictions on language of any kind. Even YOUR
treacherous malicious kind.

1st amendment. You do support the Bill of Rights, do you not? I've
seen you and your cronies cite it for your own purposes. You can't
just pick and choose, mix and match the Rights, yah know.

>BTW, you NEED ANGER MANAGEMENT.

I'm not yelling. You are.

And as I mentioned, and I'm sure anyone with half a wit would see, I
don't speak to everyone this way, only the chosen few. Hence, I manage
my anger very nicely thank you very much.

Isn't that same excuse CPS uses to remove another's children and
RIGHTS?

Why would YOU, you paragon of crusading reformers, use their tactics
on me?

>>Subject: |Re: 7 state sites for families w CPS prob. spanking
>>From: (Kane)
>>Date: 9/15/2003 2:11 PM Eastern Daylight Time
>>Message-id: >
>>
>>On 15 Sep 2003 14:50:39 GMT, (Fern5827) wrote:
>>
>>>The states are:
>>>
>>>FL
>>>IA
>>>IL
>>>KS
>>>MO
>>>NC
>>>OH
>>>
>>>Can all be reached thru Website of:
>>>
>>>http://www. CPSWatch.com
>>
>>While you, Pimp, refer the innocent, do remember you also refer the
>>guilty and those that could have been helped to reform as parents
had
>>they gotten badly needed assistance from the state.
>>
>>Then there are those children that will go home to the perps tender
>>mercies because of you...tsk.
>>
>>You sad little smelly ****.
>>
>>Kane
>>
>>
>
>
>Note K-9 has taken something from aps and fwd it here. Just so he
can mouth
>his OBSCENITIES.

Why then would you post it again, you of the habit of NEVER
attributing others posts, until now...hmmmmmm?

Suddenly you are all attributes. How refreshing for a change.

Whatever to suit YOUR purposes, eh, but would deny others. Nice going.

>I imagine Ric Werme, the founder of this NG would shake his head in
disgust at
>what you just wrote.

Can't say. I don't try to imagine what people say much. I respond to
what they do say and do.

If he was honorable he'd also shake his head at those you defend, the
nonsense you post, the biased news article you cut and paste, but I
don't think he's going to do that, do you?

>Have you no boundaries to your miserable behavior?

Just about the same as you, mostly. But I won't support lies, and you
do. I won't defend those that use CPS to keep a child and mother
apart, but you will.
I won't post, except in response to anothers attempt to decieve,
opposing information and not cite ALL of it so the reader can judge
for themselves.

You do. Screen upon screen of it for miles and miles. Daily.

>Perhaps Paula Werme who DEFENDS JUST SUCH INNOCENT FAMILIES who have
been
>falsely accused by DCYF would be tarred by such an epithet, also.


Perhaps you are pretty frantic, aren't you, DeadNettle?

How would my calling you a smelly little **** reflect on either?

Are you positioning yourself with them? Are you claiming that your
efforts, like hers, only defend the innocent? And how do you KNOW she
only defends the innocent. In fact, how does she? I've known perps to
lie. Haven't you?

Hell, even Dan doesn't confine himself to the INNOCENT. He helps the
guilty too, when it's warranted.

But you, you lie. Alot. You help the guilty when it's NOT warranted.

You post things that are of no possible use to the reform of CPS and
in fact throw a great deal in the way of them doing their job
correctly. They have to defend themselves against the results of your
lies.

That time and energy is supposed to be spent on protecting children.

You cripple reform by lying.

You bust'em in the knee then you howl about them not doing their job
while crippled. You ARE a dirty smelly little ****.

>For shame. Apparently you have never learned respectful
communication.

For shame, You fake learned respectful communication while lying
through your teeth....r r r r

There are sweeter conversationalist than conmen. They are ever soooooo
polite, until they get what they want.

>The latecomer to this NG needs to curb his anger and his vitriol:

Read back over your posts. You are full of anger and vitriol. You just
fake that you are nicey nice. You are pathetic dirtly little ****. And
a con.

Isn't it odd, that you, who would rather break a Limb than attibute
another's post you reply to, in this instance, decided to quote me
THREE times.

You really think anyone will take you seriously because you shriek
over being called out for what you are?

Well, a few numbskulls like you might object and think it over the
top, and even a few that I respect, but that in no way detracts from
your response, and its revalation of what a hypocrite you are even in
your manner of posting replies, let alone your media ****.

Continue to post lies and I'll continue to call you a dirtly little
****, what you are.

>>Subject: |Re: 7 state sites for families w CPS prob. spanking
>>From: (Kane)
>>Date: 9/15/2003 2:11 PM Eastern Daylight Time
>>Message-id: >
>>
>>On 15 Sep 2003 14:50:39 GMT, (Fern5827) wrote:
>>
>>>The states are:
>>>
>>>FL
>>>IA
>>>IL
>>>KS
>>>MO
>>>NC
>>>OH
>>>
>>>Can all be reached thru Website of:
>>>
>>>http://www. CPSWatch.com
>>
>>While you, Pimp, refer the innocent, do remember you also refer the
>>guilty and those that could have been helped to reform as parents
had
>>they gotten badly needed assistance from the state.
>>
>>Then there are those children that will go home to the perps tender
>>mercies because of you...tsk.
>>
>>You sad little smelly ****.
>>
>>Kane
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>http://www.syc.org NH site for those who DCYF has accused
unjustly.

And for those who have been justly accused as well.

So sad, a smelly little **** goes off on a rant when It get's labelled
for what it is.

By the way, how is it you don't fall into such a state of indignation
over Gregs revelations or anyone elses name calling but me?

Where is your indignation when a reporter makes a statement but fails
entirely to back it with quotes of rulings, just guesses.

No outcry when a poster carefully avoids data that would show the
entire picture and posts only that which damns fosters or CPS?
Nothing. Not a whimper.

No, Tulips, you are a liar and a cheat and a smelly little ****.

Get honest or simply get called what you are.

Your phony, one-track indignation is duly noted. <chuckle>

Kane

[Kane]

On Tue, 16 Sep 2003 04:10:16 GMT, "bobb" > wrote:

>
>"Dan Sullivan" > wrote in message
.net...
>>
>> "Fern5827" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> >
>> > >You sad little smelly @^&#.
>> > >
>> > >Kane
>> >
>> > This is uncalled for SEXUAL HARASSMENT, Kane.
>>
>> I wish you'd clean up the vocab, Kane.
>>
>> THIS was especially offensive.
>>
>> > Stop it immediately. This is totally beyond the pale.
>>
>> Stick to the flora references, if you must.
>>
>> But why don't ya just stick to the facts?
>>
>> > The uncouth, foul-mouthed Mouth K-9 insults everyone reading this
NG
>with
>> this
>> > type of language:
>>
>> I could do without it.
>>
>> And you'd be much more effective without it too.
>>
>> I've said this before.
>>
>> Dan
>>
>>
>>
> I, too, think that was totally uncouth and uncalled for. Certainly you can
>make a point without that type of language, can't you. It makes
whatever
>arguement you make quite meaningless.

That's patient nonsense. The truth withstands any strain it's put to.

But then how would you know that?

The Plant lies constantly, and attacks when it is uncalled for. For no
other reason than harrassment. It serves no reform purpose whatsoever.

It is to titilate and nothing more. If you can read and comprehend you
know that already.

When you beaten a horse to death continuing to savage the body isn't
killing the horse more.

It just shows the sick mind you possess. Why are YOU not admonishing
The Plant to lay off the harrassment?

>
>bobb
>

I'll stop when IT stops. Not before.

I'm perfectly fine with posting the faults and failures of CPS. I am
also perfectly fine with being honest about their daily and hourly
successes that save children pain and death.

When IT posts one of each to a single screen, consistently, watch me
back off. Hell, watch me congratulate Fern for finally growing up and
getting honest, and reforming herself.

`Til then it is A Plant with no rights to expect any kind of mercy or
consideration of any kind and certainly not polite discourse.

And you barely pass the mark yourself, much of the time. You are one
of the stupidest individuals I've run across here. If you were not I'd
put up with more of your nonsense and ignorance that hurts children.

When YOU grow up and learn something I might be polite to even YOU.

You are, until then, in my estimation, a menace to children.

Go **** up a rope 'til you read a few child development books. You are
ignorant as a stump and stubbornly wedded to your own dangerous
ignorance.

You are lucky I reply to you at all, and especially to your apologist
defense of a Plant.

Is that the company you want to keep?

Kane

[Doan]

On 15 Sep 2003, Kane wrote:

> On 15 Sep 2003 14:50:39 GMT, (Fern5827) wrote:
>
> >The states are:
> >
> >FL
> >IA
> >IL
> >KS
> >MO
> >NC
> >OH
> >
> >Can all be reached thru Website of:
> >
> >http://www. CPSWatch.com
>
> While you, Pimp, refer the innocent, do remember you also refer the
> guilty and those that could have been helped to reform as parents had
> they gotten badly needed assistance from the state.
>
> Then there are those children that will go home to the perps tender
> mercies because of you...tsk.
>
> You sad little smelly ****.
>
> Kane
>
Sad! This is a perfect example of how a "never-spanked" boy like Kane9
turned into. Hey, Kane9! Remember that you once crawled out of a
"smelly ****"! ;-)

Doan